Skip to content

· Private foundation

Glacs Endowment Fund

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$361k
Granted FY2021
17
Grants FY2021
7
States reached
$80k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of Glacs Endowment Fund’s FY2024 grant dollars went to Bradley Impact Fund Inc, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2021, the last year Glacs Endowment Fund named its own grantees at scale: 12 organizations, $361k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

10
’17
11
’18
11
’19
8
’20
12
’21
0
’22
0
’23
0
’24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Philanthropy$4.9MPublic Benefit$1.6MArts & Culture$152kCrime & Legal$94kReligion$74kCivil Rights$66kEnvironment$60kSocial Science$50kOther$0
02FY2021 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2021

  • Under $10k7 grants · $26k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $195k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $140k
$20,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PROJECT VERITAS$80,000
LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE$60,000
THOMAS MORE SOCIETY$35,000
INSTITUE FOR JUSTICE$25,000
JUDICIAL WATCH$25,000
GRASSROOT INSTITUTE OF HAWAII$25,000
RIVER OF LIFE MISSION$25,000
CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT THOUGHT$20,000
MOVING PICTURES INSTITUTE$20,000
PACIFIC LEGAL FOUNDATION$20,000
DAVID HOROWITZ FREEDOM CENTER$8,000
NATIONAL TAXPAYERS UNION FOUNDATION$5,000
ALEC$5,000
MEDIA RESEARCH CENTER INC$2,500
NATIONAL CENTER FOR PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 75% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT THOUGHT: $20k → 22%SALVATION ARMY: $4k → 9%PROJECT VERITAS: $80k → 9%MOVING PICTURES INSTITUTE: $20k → 17%JUDICIAL WATCH: $50k → 14%BRADLEY IMPACT FUND: $4.1M → 17%ST JUDE CHILDRENS RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $5k → 17%THOMAS MORE SOCIETY: $35k → 14%LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE: $550k → 7%NATIONAL TAXPAYERS UNION FOUNDATION: $5k → 9%GRASSROOT INSTITUTE OF HAWAII: $25k → 9%PROJECT VERITAS: $20k → 9%JUDICIAL WATCH: $25k → 14%BRADLEY IMPACT FUND: $430k → 17%LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE: $500k → 7%PROJECT VERITAS: $12k → 9%JUDICIAL WATCH: $25k → 14%BRADLEY IMPACT FUND: $429k → 17%LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE: $250k → 7%GRASSROOT INSTITUTE OF HAWAII: $15k → 9%PROJECT VERITAS: $6k → 9%JUDICIAL WATCH: $11k → 14%LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE: $60k → 7%PROJECT VERITAS: $4k → 9%JUDICIAL WATCH: $6k → 14%LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE: $40k → 7%GRASSROOT INSTITUTE OF HAWAII: $10k → 9%ATLAS ECONOMIC RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $4k → 14%LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE: $25k → 7%CATO INSTITUTE: $5k → 14%LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE: $25k → 7%GRASSROOT INSTITUTE OF HAWAII: $10k → 9%CATO INSTITUTE: $4k → 14%LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE: $7k → 7%CATO INSTITUTE: $4k → 14%INSTITUE FOR JUSTICE: $25k → 7%INSTITUE FOR JUSTICE: $15k → 7%INSTITUE FOR JUSTICE: $10k → 7%NATIONAL CENTER FOR PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH: $10k → 14%INSTITUE FOR JUSTICE: $10k → 7%NATIONAL CENTER FOR PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH: $10k → 14%INSTITUE FOR JUSTICE: $6k → 7%HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%ALEC: $10k → 7%HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%ALEC: $5k → 7%HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $4k → 14%NATIONAL CENTER FOR PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH: $3k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
WI
NY
PA
CA
VA
TN
DC
HI
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$611k · 17 repeat orgs$81k to everyone else

17 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2021, 4 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call). Read against FY2021, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
2

Total granted

$611k
$6k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+116%
+185%

Still filing today

53%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Public BenefitArts & CultureSocial ScienceCivil RightsHealthCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PV
    PROJECT VERITAS
    5× · 2017–2021 · $122k · revenue +158%
  • JUDICIAL WATCH INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $117k · revenue +141%
  • IF
    INSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE
    5× · 2017–2021 · $66k · revenue +57%

Funded once

  • AE
    Atlas Economic Research Foundationgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $4k · revenue +185%
  • BO
    BROTHERHOOD ORG OF A NEW DESTINY
    one grant, 2019 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Liberty Justice Center

To advance economic and social liberties and a free enterprise society through strategic litigation, training, communication, activism and research. in addition, the center will train law students, lawyers and policy activists in the…

Crime & Legal
2
International Republican Institute

Iri advances freedom and democracy worldwide by developing political parties, civic institutions, open elections, democratic governance and the rule of law.

Education
3
Institute for Public Accuracy

To teach and disseminate educational materials to the public.

Arts & Culture
4
American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research

The american enterprise institute is a community of scholars and supporters committed to expanding liberty, increasing individual opportunity, and strengthening free enterprise. aei pursues these ideals through independent thinking and the…

Social Science
5
Foreign Policy Research Institute

The foreign policy research institute (frpi) is dedicated to producing the highest quality scholarship and nonpartisan policy analysis focused on crucial foreign policy and national security challenges facing the united states. we educate…

International
6
The International Institute for Strategic Studies - Us

To provide accurate, objective information and analysis on international strategic issues for legislators, diplomats, foreign affairs analysts, international business leaders, economists, the military, defense commentators, journalists,…

International
7
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
8
Manhattan Institute for Policy Research Inc

The manhattan institute is a community of scholars, journalists, activists, and civic leaders dedicated to advancing opportunity, individual liberty, and the rule of law in america and its great cities.

Public Benefit
9
Competitive Enterprise Institute

Competitive enterprise institute (cei) is a non-profit public policy organization dedicated to the principles of free enterprise and limited government. we believe that consumers are best helped not by government regulation but by being…

—
10
The American Antitrust Institute Inc

Promote competition that protects consumers, businesses, and society.

Social Science
11
Pro Publica Inc

Pro publica is an independent, non-profit, pulitzer prize-winning newsroom that produces investigative journalism in the public interest. our work focuses exclusively on truly important stories. [see continuation on schedule o] we produce…

Arts & Culture
12
Institute for Strategic Dialogue-Us

Isd-us is an independent, non-partisan, non-profit organization dedicated to defending democracy and individual rights against threats to public safety and national security. isd-us is at the forefront of analyzing and innovating solutions…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Heritage Foundation; the most unlike its peers is St Jude Children's Research Hospital Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/16
Grantees still filing
13/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BRADLEY IMPACT FUND INC: $4,930,462 · PhilanthropyBRADLEY IMPACT FUND INCLeadership Institute: $1,457,000 · Public BenefitLeadership InstituteJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $117,000 · Public BenefitJUDICIAL WATCH INCGRASSROOT INSTITUTE OF HAWAII INC: $60,000 · Public Benefit+2 more: $32,000 · Public BenefitPROJECT VERITAS: $122,000 · OtherRIVER OF LIFE MISSION: $72,000 · OtherDAVID HOROWITZ FREEDOM CENTER: $31,000 · OtherPACIFIC LEGAL FOUNDATION: $27,500 · OtherNATIONAL CENTER FOR PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH: $25,500 · OtherALEC: $19,000 · Other+5 more: $23,794 · OtherINSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE: $66,000 · Civil RightsTHOMAS MORE SOCIETY: $35,000 · Crime & LegalMOVING PICTURE INSTITUTE: $20,000 · Arts & CultureMEDIA RESEARCH CENTER: $10,000 · Arts & CultureCENTER FOR INDEPENDENT THOUGHT: $20,000 · Social ScienceAtlas Economic Research Foundation: $4,000 · Social ScienceST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $7,000 · Health
Philanthropy$4,930,462Public Benefit$1,666,000Other$320,794Civil Rights$66,000Crime & Legal$35,000Arts & Culture$30,000Social Science$24,000Health$7,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBRADLEY IMPACT FUND INC: $4,930,462 over 3y, 5.1% of budgetLeadership Institute: $1,457,000 over 8y, 1.4% of budgetPROJECT VERITAS: $122,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $117,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE: $66,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetGRASSROOT INSTITUTE OF HAWAII INC: $60,000 over 4y, 2.1% of budgetTHOMAS MORE SOCIETY: $35,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetDAVID HOROWITZ FREEDOM CENTER: $31,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL CENTER FOR PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH: $25,500 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetMOVING PICTURE INSTITUTE: $20,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCENTER FOR INDEPENDENT THOUGHT: $20,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCATO INSTITUTE: $18,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $14,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMEDIA RESEARCH CENTER: $10,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $7,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAtlas Economic Research Foundation: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BRADLEY IMPACT FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds Leadership Institute ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT VERITAS ↗
  • Who funds JUDICIAL WATCH INC ↗
  • Who funds INSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE ↗
  • Who funds GRASSROOT INSTITUTE OF HAWAII INC ↗
  • Who funds THOMAS MORE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds DAVID HOROWITZ FREEDOM CENTER ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL CENTER FOR PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH ↗
  • Who funds MOVING PICTURE INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT THOUGHT ↗
  • Who funds CATO INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MEDIA RESEARCH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds Atlas Economic Research Foundation ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Bradley Impact Fund IncWI15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Bradley Impact Fund Inc · Donors Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Glacs Endowment Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Glacs Endowment Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Glacs Endowment Fund?

    Find your warmest path to Glacs Endowment Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Glacs Endowment’s filings →

    More from the funding graph