Skip to content

Hawaii · Private foundation

Glacs Endowment Fund

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$361k
Granted FY2021
17
Grants FY2021
16
Organizations funded FY2021
19%
First-time grantees FY2021
Read the full brief

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of Glacs Endowment Fund’s FY2024 grant dollars went to Bradley Impact Fund Inc, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2021, the last year Glacs Endowment Fund named its own grantees at scale: 12 organizations, $361k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

10
’17
11
’18
11
’19
8
’20
12
’21
0
’22
0
’23
0
’24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

Median grant, FY2021
$20,000
Largest grant, FY2021
$80,000
Organizations funded a year
11 to 17
FY2017 to FY2021
States reached, FY2021
7
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2021, 19% of the organizations Glacs Endowment Fund funded were first-time grantees, receiving 25% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $75k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21
Public BenefitCrime & LegalArts & CultureSocial ScienceHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY202116$301k19%
FY202011$101k0%
FY201917$129k6%
FY201817$110k12%
FY201716$51kn/a
98% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Philanthropy$4.9MPublic Benefit$1.6MArts & Culture$152kCrime & Legal$94kReligion$74kCivil Rights$66kEnvironment$60kSocial Science$50kOther$0

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
WI
NY
PA
CA
VA
TN
DC
HI

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Project Veritas$122,00050%
Judicial Watch Inc$117,00050%
River of Life Mission$72,0005n/a
Institute for Justice$66,00050%
Grassroot Institute of Hawaii Inc$60,00042%
Thomas More Society$35,00010%
David Horowitz Freedom Center$31,00050%
National Center for Public Policy Research$25,50040%
Moving Picture Institute$20,00010%
Center for Independent Thought$20,00011%
Show all 15 grantees
All grantees of Glacs Endowment Fund by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Project Veritas$122,00050%
Judicial Watch Inc$117,00050%
River of Life Mission$72,0005n/a
Institute for Justice$66,00050%
Grassroot Institute of Hawaii Inc$60,00042%
Thomas More Society$35,00010%
David Horowitz Freedom Center$31,00050%
National Center for Public Policy Research$25,50040%
Moving Picture Institute$20,00010%
Center for Independent Thought$20,00011%
Cato Institute$18,00050%
The Heritage Foundation$14,00030%
Media Research Center$10,00050%
St Jude Children's Research Hospital Inc$7,00020%
Atlas Economic Research Foundation$4,00010%

Plus 7 recipients with no EIN on record ($70k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Glacs Endowment Fund supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetProject Veritas: $122,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetJudicial Watch Inc: $117,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetInstitute for Justice: $66,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetGrassroot Institute of Hawaii Inc: $60,000 over 4y, 2.1% of budgetThomas More Society: $35,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetDavid Horowitz Freedom Center: $31,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetNational Center for Public Policy Research: $25,500 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetMoving Picture Institute: $20,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCenter for Independent Thought: $20,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCato Institute: $18,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetThe Heritage Foundation: $14,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMedia Research Center: $10,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSt Jude Children's Research Hospital Inc: $7,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAtlas Economic Research Foundation: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 14.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Bradley Impact Fund IncWI15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Bradley Impact Fund Inc · Donors Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Glacs Endowment Fund with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Glacs Endowment Fund?

Find your warmest path to Glacs Endowment Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About Glacs Endowment Fund

How much does Glacs Endowment Fund give?
Glacs Endowment Fund reported 17 grants totaling $360,547 in its FY2021 IRS filing. It funded between 11 and 17 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2021.
What does Glacs Endowment Fund fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2024, its largest causes are Philanthropy (70%), Public Benefit (23%), Arts & Culture (2%).
Who are Glacs Endowment Fund's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2024: Project Veritas ($122k), Judicial Watch Inc ($117k), River of Life Mission ($72k).
Does Glacs Endowment Fund fund new organizations?
In FY2021, 19% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Glacs Endowment Fund accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as Glacs Endowment Fund?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Bradley Impact Fund Inc, Donors Trust Inc, Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program.
Where is Glacs Endowment Fund based?
Glacs Endowment Fund is based in HI.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Glacs Endowment’s filings →

More from the funding graph