Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

GJJAMS Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$24k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$97kArts & Culture$48kInternational$34kHealth$32kPublic Benefit$31kRecreation & Sports$10kHuman Services$2kCrime & Legal$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$692k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GLOBAL TIES US$10,000
UNC-G EXCELLENCE FOUNDATION$5,000
UNC-G EXCELLENCE FOUNDATION$5,000
CHAPARRAL FIREBIRDS FOOTBALL FOUNDATION$2,000
CASA BRAZIL INC$1,000
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER GREENSBORO INC$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–21, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ALEXANDER YOUTH NETWORK: $1k → 10%SERVICE WOMENS ACTION NETWORK: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
MA
VA
AZ
KS
AR
NC
DC

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$241k · 10 repeat orgs$16k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +113% since the first grant, against +32% for the ones you funded once.

10 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
11

Total granted

$241k
$16k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+113%
+32%

Still filing today

80%
73%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthInternationalHuman ServicesPhilanthropyAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UE
    UNCG EXCELLENCE FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $45k · revenue +368%
  • NF
    NATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR WOMEN LEGISLATORS INC
    4× · 2017–2023 · $31k · revenue +61%
  • CB
    CASA BRAZIL INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $14k · revenue +102%

Funded once

  • AD
    ALZHEIMERS DISEASE AND RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATI
    one grant, 2023 · $3k
  • SA
    SEQUOYA ASSOC OF PARENT & TEACHERS INC
    one grant, 2024 · $3k · revenue -8%
  • WI
    WWP INC
    one grant, 2019 · $2k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Foreign Service Association

American foreign service association (afsa) is both the principal advocate for the long-term institutional wellbeing of the professional career foreign service and responsible for safeguarding the interest of afsa members. (continued on…

2
Aacsb International - the Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business

Aacsb international provides quality assurance of business school programs, the latest in business education intelligence, thought leadership, and learning and development services.

Education
3
National Association of Insurance and Financial Advisors

Empowering financial professionals and consumers through world-class advocacy and education.

4
The Leadership Foundation

The leadership foundation, inc. (the foundation), established in 1990, is the mechanism by which iwf members advance the next generation of women leaders. the foundation accelerates the careers of top-performing women by offering…

5
The American College of Trust and Estate Counsel

Enhance the ability of actec members to provide the most efficient and highest quality services to their clients; develop qualified trust and estate counselors; improve and reform probate, trust and tax laws, procedures, and standards of…

Community Improvement
6
Womens Funding Network

Our mission as a global alliance is to provide strategies, research, and resources that support the critical agency and influence of women's foundations and gender justice funders in the movement for equality, justice, and power for all.

Education
7
Air & Space Forces Association

The air & space forces association (afa) is a nonprofit, independent, professional military, and aerospace education association. the association's mission is to promote dominant u.s. air and space forces as the foundation of a strong…

Education
8
North Carolina State University Alumni Association Inc

The nc state alumni association engages alumni and friends through programs and services that foster pride and enhance a lifelong connection to nc state university ("nc state").

9
Alpha Delta Pi Sorority

Social organization to promote academic achievement and leadership training of its members.

10
Association of Clinical Research Professionals

Acrp promotes excellence in clinical research. we support clinical research professionals through training and development, the exchange of ideas and expertise, and certification. we serve as the preferred source for quality tools,…

Health
11
National Association of College and University Attorneys

To advance the practice of higher education attorneys for the benefit of the institutions they serve.

12
Kids in Need Foundation

We believe every child in america should have equal opportunity and resources to engage in a quality education. by partnering with teachers and students in under-resourced schools, we provide the support needed to create equitable learning…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Heifer International Foundation and the most unlike its peers is American Humane Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/18
Grantees still filing
12/18
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT GREENSBORO — $105,150 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT GREENSBORONATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR WOMEN LEGISLATORS INC — $31,000 · OtherNATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR WOMEN LEGISLATORS INCCOCOPAH MIDDLE SCHOOL ASSOCIATION OF PARENTS AND T — $6,000 · Other+4 more — $9,000 · Other+4 moreUNCG EXCELLENCE FOUNDATION INC — $44,500 · EducationUNCG EXCELLENCE FOUNDATION IN…CHAPARRAL FIREBIRD FOOTBALL FOUNDATION — $10,000 · EducationCHAPARRAL FIREBIRD FOOTBALL F…CHAPARRAL HIGH ASSOC OF PARENTS & TEACHERS — $5,000 · EducationCHAPARRAL HIGH ASSOC OF PAREN…KINO LEARNING CENTER DBA KINO SCHOOLS — $4,000 · EducationKINO LEARNING CENTER DBA KINO…SEQUOYA ASSOC OF PARENT & TEACHERS INC — $3,000 · EducationGLOBAL TIES US — $19,000 · InternationalHEIFER INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION — $1,000 · InternationalCASA BRAZIL INC — $13,500 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER GREENSBORO INC — $1,000 · PhilanthropyALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $1,000 · HealthALL RISE FOR JUSTICE — $1,000 · HealthSERVICE WOMENS ACTION NETWORK — $1,000 · Human ServicesALEXANDER YOUTH NETWORK — $1,000 · Human ServicesAMERICAN HUMANE ASSOCIATION — $1,000 · AnimalsFINAL SALUTE INC — $500 · Housing & Shelter
Other$151,150Education$66,500International$20,000Philanthropy$14,500Health$2,000Human Services$2,000Animals$1,000Housing & Shelter$500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUNCG EXCELLENCE FOUNDATION INC — $44,500 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetNATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR WOMEN LEGISLATORS INC — $31,000 over 4y, 2.1% of budgetGLOBAL TIES US — $19,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCASA BRAZIL INC — $13,500 over 8y, 4.9% of budgetCHAPARRAL FIREBIRD FOOTBALL FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 3y, 3.0% of budgetCHAPARRAL HIGH ASSOC OF PARENTS & TEACHERS — $5,000 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetKINO LEARNING CENTER DBA KINO SCHOOLS — $4,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetEMILY'S KIDS FOUNDATION INC — $3,000 over 2y, 3.8% of budgetSEQUOYA ASSOC OF PARENT & TEACHERS INC — $3,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN HUMANE ASSOCIATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSERVICE WOMENS ACTION NETWORK — $1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetALL RISE FOR JUSTICE — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGirls Rule Foundation Inc — $1,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetALEXANDER YOUTH NETWORK — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHEIFER INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFINAL SALUTE INC — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC8.5× affinity7 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization GJJAMS Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph