Skip to content

Virginia · Nonprofit

ALL RISE FOR JUSTICE

ALL RISE FOR JUSTICE (Virginia) receives grants from 9 organizations whose IRS filings report $1,565,139 to it, the largest being AMERICAN UNIVERSITY ($978,293). 4 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2025
$23M
Funders on record
9
Grants received
$1.6M
Net assets
$16M
4/9 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 4%
01What it does

What All Rise for Justice does

Mission

All Rise for Justice (all rise) seeks to reduce substance abuse, crime, and recidivism by promoting and advocating for the establishment, growth, and funding of drug courts and providing for the collection and dissemination of information, technical assistance, and mutual support to association members.since 1994, all rise has worked tirelessly at the international, national, state, and local levels to create and enhance drug courts, including adult, juvenile, family, reentry, and tribal models; dwi courts; and veterans treatment courts. The award-winning all rise is the premier national repository, training, and advocacy organization for the drug court model, representing over 27,000 multi-disciplinary justice professionals and community leaders.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Veteran treatment court training and technical assistance (vtta):jfv provided onsite, phone, and web-based technical assistance to all bja grantees and non-grantee courts that requested tta services to develop, implement, and sustain evidence-based practices for increased program effectiveness and long-term participant success. The jfv ta team provided 44 virtual and onsite training sessions for bja grantees, serving 631 vtc practitioners. Jfv supports communities in designing and implementing veteran treatment courts, particularly those in the planning phase or facing significant staff turnover without formal training. We provided foundational training to 15 teams and 201 adult practitioners during this award period. We hosted 19 statewide conferences serving 9,193 treatment court practitioners. Jfv hosted four operational tune-ups, serving 42 vtc practitioners. Jfv hosted eight mentor professional development trainings, serving 37 teams representing 122 volunteer veteran mentors. We hosted a multi-track workshop serving 12 practitioners. We hosted vtc office hours, serving 54 treatment court practitioners and one community of practice serving eight practitioners. We served as a…

    $4,219,143 spent
    22% of program spending
  2. Conference -all rise's annual training conference, rise, was held in may 2025 in orlando, fl, and drew nearly 7,000 attendees from all 50 states and around the world. The conference included sessions that focused not only on drug treatment courts but on promoting recovery and alternatives to incarceration for those living with substance use or other mental health disorders throughout the justice system. Rise is the nation's largest conference for those working at the intersection of addiction, mental health, and justice. It includes hundreds of groundbreaking sessions and evidence-based resources for all professions involved in treatment courts and elsewhere in public health and public safety arenas.

    $3,474,897 spent$6,398,935 earned by the program
    18% of program spending
  3. Office of national drug control policy (ondcp):the treatment court institute (tci) developed online interactive tools to highlight evidence-based and promising programs across all stages of the criminal justice process, from arrest through reentry. Additionally, tci established best practice standards and service-matching protocols to ensure individuals are placed in appropriate programs based on their assessed treatment needs and risk factors for recidivism or treatment attrition. To support probation officers, tci published a practitioner toolkit that incorporates the latest research on probation's role in treatment courts. As part of its ongoing commitment to addressing opioid use disorder, tci launched part ii of a national study focused on increasing the uptake of medication for opioid use disorder (moud) in treatment courts. During the grant period, tci provided moud training to 1,162 attendees. In collaboration with the american society of addiction medicine (asam), tci offers no-cost, evidence-based training for treatment providers working with drug courts at the statewide, regional, and national levels. In 2025, 2,111 attendees completed the online, self-paced treatment…

    $3,042,917 spent
    16% of program spending
  4. Adult treatment court training initiative (atcti): the treatment court institute (tci) provided training to help operational adult drug treatment court programs develop and implement improved practices to increase effectiveness and long-term participant success. We conducted 10 adult operational tune-up trainings, serving 406 treatment court practitioners. We provided speakers for 31 statewide in-person and virtual events, serving 9,707 treatment court practitioners. We conducted 6 incentives, sanctions, and service adjustments (issa) training to serve 145 treatment court practitioners. We hosted two learning communities.

    $1,860,704 spent
    10% of program spending
  5. Adult drug court technical assistance (adcta):the treatment court institute (tci) delivered requested onsite, phone, and web-based tta to bja grantees and non-grantee courts to support the development, implementation, and sustainability of evidence-based practices that strengthen court operations, enhance public safety, and improve long-term participant outcomes. In 2025, we conducted 41 on-site tta visits, including interviews, observations of the court process, and tailored commendations and recommendations. We provided an introductory webinar for new grantees to outline available services, introduce tta staff, and address questions. We completed 51 training and ta visits serving 738 practitioners, and conducted 171 individual/team coaching sessions. Through 5 ask the expert virtual office hour events, we supported 340 practitioners and responded to an additional 79 field-submitted ask the expert questions. We also delivered 3 targeted best-practice webinars on community supervision, targeting and eligibility, and team roles and responsibilities, with a total of 1,025 participants. We subcontracted with npc research to finalize the online best assessment for any court to access,…

    $1,709,025 spent
    9% of program spending
  6. Office of juvenile justice delinquency and prevention (ojjdp)in 2025, the juvenile training and technical assistance (tta) collaborative continued to advance its mission of strengthening the capacity of juvenile drug treatment courts through comprehensive training, technical assistance, and resource development. Over the course of the year, the team delivered training and technical assistance to courts nationwide through a wide range of support activities, including more than 40 trainings and/or meetings, including support for statewide conferences, foundational jdtc trainings at the local level, operational tune-up services, virtual webinars, and targeted assistance requested through tta360. The tta collaborative also made substantial progress on developing four updated jdtc curricula and several new elearning modules. Quarterly grantee meetings and other virtual convenings consistently drew strong participation from practitioners, and tune in tuesday webinar sessions continued to serve as an effective platform for sharing best practices and emerging information. Staff and faculty members contributed to the field's professional development by presenting numerous sessions at…

    $1,359,233 spentof which $529,155 as grants
    7% of program spending
  7. Adult treatment court foundational training (atcft)the treatment court institute (tci) supports communities in designing and implementing adult treatment courts, particularly those in the planning phase or facing significant staff turnover and a lack of formal training. We provided live training to 19 teams and 211 adult practitioners during this award period. To strengthen foundational knowledge, tci developed and continues to maintain the "essential elements" e-learning module. This online training program includes core modules that each team must complete before attending the onsite planning initiative training. To date, 211 individuals have completed the program, and attendees have consistently provided positive feedback on its effectiveness in preparing them for in-person sessions. As part of this award, 34 treatment court practitioners participated in the mentor court network, a program that provided scholarships for hands-on learning. Participants visited a mentor court, observed pre-court staffing and hearings, and shadowed a team member to gain deeper insights into their role. We provided scholarships for 20 mentor court team members to attend the annual conference…

    $1,227,428 spent
    6% of program spending
  8. New york state rural opioid court ta (nys rocta):all rise's center for advancing justice provided technical assistance and implementation support to eight rural counties in new york state to advance the development and operation of opioid intervention courts (oics). These eight sites were selected by new york state and included: genesee county, columbia county, cortland county, wyoming county, sullivan county, delaware county, chenango county, and green county. Guided by the ten essential elements of opioid intervention courts and the new york state oic toolkit (previously developed in partnership with all rise), caj conducted introductory meetings, distributed needs assessments, and facilitated targeted training and technical assistance through in-person site visits and ongoing virtual consultations. Activities included observing court operations, delivering workshops on program structure and team roles, assisting jurisdictions in developing policies, mous, referral processes, and case flow procedures, and convening stakeholder meetings with justice system partners and community agencies. Across the sites, the project focused on strengthening cross-system collaboration, expansing…

    $546,286 spent
    3% of program spending
  9. Fee for serviceall rise offers training and research-based curricula to outside entities, tailoring services to meet the needs of requesting agencies through formal contracts. In 2025, all rise partnered with six different organizations to deliver specialized training programs. This included five operational tune-up trainings for adult, family, and veteran treatment courts in georgia. We also conducted an operational tune-up for missouri. Additionally, all rise provided customized training for the new port news federal court. All rise partnered with the high-intensity drug trafficking area (hidta) to provide training to law enforcement agencies in mclean, virginia, and dallas, texas. Tci continues to support drug court practitioners through national, discipline-specific training. In 2025, we trained 103 coordinators, 96 judges, and 96 defense attorneys.

    $455,636 spent$540,076 earned by the program
    2% of program spending
  10. National highway traffic safety administration (nhtsa)impaired driving solutions (ids) conducts training and technical assistance for treatment courts that accept participants whose primary offense is impaired driving. The national highway traffic safety administration provides funding for these projects, and in 2025, it funded ids for six months. During 2025, ids conducted 1 foundational workshop (implementation) and 15 onsite technical assistance events. Foundational training served 2 jurisdictions and a total of 19 treatment court practitioners and madd representatives. Evaluations (participant feedback) were conducted for all training; overall, responses were positive. Of the 15 onsite ta events, 9 were for state or local training, 4 were for national or regional conferences, and 2 were for judicial conferences. The 15 state/local trainings either included individual sessions at state conferences or one or more days of targeted assistance with local treatment court teams. Approximately 1,203 individuals were served in this category. The three national conferences included treatment court and non-treatment court practitioners serving in the traffic safety/impaired driving…

    $431,871 spent
    2% of program spending
  11. Other programs:all rise's center for advancing justice (caj) is partnering with justice system agencies and community-based organizations in kenosha county, wisconsin, to implement the every court is a treatment court initiative. This effort is designed to strengthen the county's capacity to universally screen, assess, and promptly connect individuals to appropriate, evidence-based interventions that address each individual's criminogenic risk factors and clinical needs, consistent with the evidence-based practices outlined in all rise's adult treatment court best practice standards. These interventions include treatment courts, diversion programs, pretrial supervision, and other supportive services. In 2025, all rise and kenosha county achieved several major milestones. The partnership established universal risk and needs screening for criminal defendants and developed individualized treatment and supervision plans informed by validated risk-need assessments. The district attorney and public defender formalized collaboration through a memorandum of understanding. Key stakeholders, including the judge, prosecutor, probation officers, public defender, jail staff, and treatment…

    $766,306 spent
    4% of program spending

The 11 programs described on its FY2025 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $19,093,446.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($12M) Expenses 100 ($12M) Net assets 100 ($2.1M)2018 Revenue 107 ($13M) Expenses 102 ($12M) Net assets 133 ($2.8M)2019 Revenue 142 ($17M) Expenses 134 ($16M) Net assets 192 ($4.1M)2020 Revenue 127 ($15M) Expenses 120 ($14M) Net assets 238 ($5.1M)2021 Revenue 131 ($15M) Expenses 130 ($15M) Net assets 254 ($5.5M)2022 Revenue 177 ($21M) Expenses 156 ($18M) Net assets 351 ($7.5M)2023 Revenue 198 ($23M) Expenses 179 ($21M) Net assets 486 ($10M)2024 Revenue 200 ($23M) Expenses 180 ($21M) Net assets 623 ($13M)2025 Revenue 198 ($23M) Expenses 187 ($22M) Net assets 739 ($16M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (198)Expenses (187)Net assets (739)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2021 to 2022, from $7.3M to $11M (+52%).

$3.7M
$4.5M
$5.7M
$6.8M
$7.3M
$11M
$14M
$15M
$17M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 65% · 2018 61% · 2019 71% · 2020 82% · 2021 76% · 2022 65% · 2023 69% · 2024 65% · 2025 65%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

67% of ALL RISE FOR JUSTICE’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (7% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 4,743 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 0 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

$175k
’17
$730k
’18
$1.1M
’19
$985k
’20
$365k
’21
$2.7M
’22
$2.6M
’23
$2.7M
’24
$1.7M
’25
2.0
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Carson Fox

Chief executive officer

Board chair

Hon Willima Meyer

Chair

As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Listed353231313736384031
Joined·+2+5+8+9+4+9+7+3
No longer listed·568357512
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base narrowed from 2 funders to 1 funder, grant income fell $91k → $197.

3 of 9 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 2% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of ALL RISE FOR JUSTICE’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

ALL RISE FOR JUSTICE leans on a few funders — its largest provides 63% of grant income and the top three 90%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

85% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund ALL RISE FOR JUSTICE.

63%
largest funder
90%
top three
~2
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 99% · 2018 81% · 2019 74% · 2020 90% · 2021 76% · 2022 100% · 2023 100% — broadly stable.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

17% of ALL RISE FOR JUSTICE's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 44% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

ALL RISE FOR JUSTICE draws 100% of its grant income from funders outside Virginia, across 4 states in all.

NY
MA
DE
DC

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
Virginia out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $29k arriving through sponsors registered in 3 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

ALL RISE FOR JUSTICE runs a healthier operating margin than half of the 2,843 health nonprofits its size.

Operating margin7% · above the median
Months of reserve2.0mo · above the median
Revenue growth (annualized)9% · above the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 2,843 health nonprofits $10M–$100M, FY2025

Government funding ALL RISE FOR JUSTICE receives

Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $107.3M on record — $107.2M federal, $107k state.

Federal$107.2M
grants $107.0Mcontracts $150k
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Top agencies
  • Department of Justice$72.0M
  • Executive Office of the President$20.9M
  • Department of Transportation$13.1M
  • Department of State$1.0M
  • Department of Health and Human Services$150k
State$107k
24
25
26
By state
  • NJ$101k
  • VT$6k

Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.

Organizations like ALL RISE FOR JUSTICE

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Virginia

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

88% of spending goes to programs.

Program 88%Management 12%Fundraising 0%

Governance

18
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention–Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

98%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 32 states

AK
ME
NH
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
KY
WV
VA
MD
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
HI
OK
MS
AL
GA
FL

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for ALL RISE FOR JUSTICE: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds ALL RISE FOR JUSTICE?
ALL RISE FOR JUSTICE (Virginia) receives grants from 9 organizations whose IRS filings report $1,565,139 to it, the largest being AMERICAN UNIVERSITY ($978,293). 4 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does ALL RISE FOR JUSTICE have?
IRS filings report 9 organizations giving $1,565,139 in grants to ALL RISE FOR JUSTICE, 4 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of ALL RISE FOR JUSTICE?
AMERICAN UNIVERSITY is the largest funder on record, with $978,293 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like ALL RISE FOR JUSTICE find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Virginia. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 9 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing