Skip to content

· Private foundation

Giving Well International Foundation

Its FY2021 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$35k
Granted FY2020
21
Grants FY2020
10
States reached
$13k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2020.

International$105kReligion$30kHuman Services$23kCrime & Legal$9kPublic Safety & Disaster$8kYouth Development$2kEducation$1kPhilanthropy$649Other$0
02FY2020 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2020

  • Under $10k20 grants · $22k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $13k
$541
Median grant
10
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LAUNCHGOOD INC$12,947
MCWS$7,000
YAQEEN INSTITUTE FOR ISLAMIC RESEAR$6,129
Individual grant recipient$1,081
Individual grant recipient$1,000
SITARA FOUNDATION$1,000
AMANA FOUNDATION$1,000
IMAN JASIM FOUNDATION$1,000
FONS VITAE OF KENTUCKY$541
Individual grant recipient$541
AMERICAN MUSLIM FUNDS$541
Individual grant recipient$500
Individual grant recipient$379
PURE HAND INC$271
DREAM OF DETROIT$217
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–20, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 13% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%AMANA FOUNDATION: $1k → 6%AFFIA FOUNDATION: $500 → 9%DREAM OF DETROIT: $217 → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
NY
IN
OH
PA
CA
KY
TN
DC
LA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

73%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$132k · 4 repeat orgs$48k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +113% since the first grant, against +105% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2020, 1 since wound down; 17 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
16

Total granted

$132k
$27k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+113%
+105%

Still filing today

25%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2020, 39% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $21k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20
Human ServicesInternationalArts & CulturePublic Safety & DisasterSocial ScienceFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IR
    ISLAMIC RELIEF USA
    2× · 2018–2019 · $99k
  • M
    MCWS
    2× · 2019–2020 · $15k
  • YI
    YAQEEN INSTITUTE FOR ISLAMIC RESEAR
    2× · 2019–2020 · $12k

Funded once

  • TF
    TAYBA FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $9k · revenue +86%
  • BI
    BAITULMAAL INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $4k · revenue ×12
  • TF
    THE FAMILY AND YOUTH INSTITUTEgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $2k · revenue +67%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Al Ansaar Foundation for Humanity
Philanthropy
2
The Noor Foundation
Philanthropy
3
International Institute of Islamic Thought the Fairfax Institute
Education
4
Islamic Ummah Relief Corp

Develop long-term developmental projects aimed at providing a sustainable living for poor communities as well as supporting needy widows and orphans

Human Services
5
International Institute of Islamic Medicine

International Institute of Islamic Medicine (IIIM) acquires and disseminates knowledge of the rich history of Islamic medicine and fosters its contemporary application

Human Services
6
Dallas Islamic Foundation
Religion
7
Cambodian Islamic Foundation
Education
8
Muslim Aid America

Provide help to people who are victims of natural disasters or conflicts or suffering from poverty, hunger, disease, illiteracy, discrimination, homelessness, debt, unemployment, injustice, or lack of skills or economic opportunity.

Public Safety & Disaster
9
Noohra Foundation

Noorha is a non-profit religious educational foundation whose mission is to provide biblical research and educational materials on various subjects.

Arts & Culture
10
Itqaan Institute

An educational organization providing premier educational services to those who cannot afford it, as well as general charitable services

Education
11
Islamic Relief Usa

Islamic relief usa provides relief and development in a dignified manner regardless of gender, race, or religion, and works to empower individuals in their communities and give them a voice in the world.

International
12
Rehmat Foundation
Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Baitulmaal Inc; the most unlike its peers is Dream of Detroit. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
12/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ISLAMIC RELIEF USA: $98,511 · OtherISLAMIC RELIEF USAMCWS: $15,041 · OtherMCWSLAUNCHGOOD INC: $12,947 · OtherLAUNCHGOOD INCYAQEEN INSTITUTE FOR ISLAMIC RESEAR: $12,298 · OtherYAQEEN INSTITUTE FOR ISLAMIC RESEAR+25 more: $16,821 · Other+25 moreTAYBA FOUNDATION: $9,274 · Arts & CultureICNA RELIEF USA PROGRAMS INC: $6,608 · Public Safety & DisasterBAITULMAAL INC: $3,600 · InternationalIMAN JASIM FOUNDATION: $1,000 · InternationalTHE FAMILY AND YOUTH INSTITUTE: $2,000 · Social ScienceAMANA FOUNDATION: $1,000 · Human ServicesTHE AFYA FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC: $500 · Human ServicesDream of Detroit: $217 · Human ServicesTHE KBK RELIEF FOUNDATION: $1,082 · Food & Nutrition
Other$155,618Arts & Culture$9,274Public Safety & Disaster$6,608International$4,600Social Science$2,000Human Services$1,717Food & Nutrition$1,082

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTAYBA FOUNDATION: $9,274 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetICNA RELIEF USA PROGRAMS INC: $6,608 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBAITULMAAL INC: $3,600 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE FAMILY AND YOUTH INSTITUTE: $2,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCommunity Helpers of Rutherford County: $1,082 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAMANA FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetIMAN JASIM FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFONS VITAE OF KENTUCKY INC: $541 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAmerican Muslim Community Foundation: $541 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AFYA FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDream of Detroit: $217 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ZAKAT FOUNDATION OF AMERICA: $108 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TAYBA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ICNA RELIEF USA PROGRAMS INC ↗
  • Who funds BAITULMAAL INC ↗
  • Who funds THE FAMILY AND YOUTH INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds THE KBK RELIEF FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Community Helpers of Rutherford County ↗
  • Who funds AMANA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds IMAN JASIM FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FONS VITAE OF KENTUCKY INC ↗
  • Who funds American Muslim Community Foundation ↗
  • Who funds THE AFYA FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds Dream of Detroit ↗
  • Who funds THE ZAKAT FOUNDATION OF AMERICA ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Muslim Community FoundationCA15.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Muslim Community Foundation · Islamic Relief USA · The Syed Foundation · The Tabbaa Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Giving Well International Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Giving Well International Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2021) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2020, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Giving Well International’s filings →

    More from the funding graph