Skip to content

· Private foundation

Giustina Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$4.7M
Granted FY2025still arriving
21
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$4.1M
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$5.9MRecreation & Sports$1.3MSocial Science$250kHuman Services$176kEnvironment$109kArts & Culture$75kPublic Benefit$55kCrime & Legal$51kOther$0
02FY2025 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k12 grants · $32k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $60k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $490k
  • $250k+1 grant · $4.1M
$5,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$15M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF OREGON FOUNDATION$4,080,000
UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION - CSU - CHICO$205,000
LANE COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION$110,000
EUGENE CIVIC ALLIANCE$100,000
THE JOHN G SHEDD INSTITUTE FOR THE ARTS$75,000
UNIVERSITY OF OREGON FOUNDATION$25,000
THE FREEDOM FOUNDATION$15,000
MCKENZIE RIVER TRUST$10,000
EMERALD KIDSPORTS$10,000
EUGENE FAMILY YMCA$5,000
PLEASANT HILL EDUCATION FOUNDATION$5,000
PACIFIC LEGAL FOUNDATION$5,000
SERENITY LANE$5,000
FANCONI ANEMIA RESEARCH FUND$2,500
UNITED WAY OF LANE COUNTY$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $166k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%EUGENE FAMILY YMCA: $150k → 15%EUGENE FAMILY YMCA: $5k → 15%EUGENE FAMILY YMCA: $5k → 15%EUGENE FAMILY YMCA: $1k → 15%EUGENE FAMILY YMCA: $1k → 15%HOSEA YOUTH SERVICES: $1k → 15%EUGENE FAMILY YMCA: $1k → 15%EUGENE FAMILY YMCA: $1k → 15%EUGENE FAMILY YMCA: $1k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$7.4M · 28 repeat orgs$518k to everyone else

28 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

28
5

Total granted

$7.4M
$232k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
+378%

Still filing today

75%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $286k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationEnvironmentHealthHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UNIVERSITY OF OREGON FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $4.6M · revenue +182%
  • EC
    EUGENE CIVIC ALLIANCE
    6× · 2018–2025 · $1.1M · revenue +100%
  • LC
    LANE COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $642k · revenue +108%

Funded once

  • UF
    UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION - CHICO
    one grant, 2024 · $200k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF OREGON FOUNDATION - GIUSTINA LIBRARY FUND
    one grant, 2017 · $25k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF OREGON ALUMNI ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2018 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Oregon Agricultural Trust

Oregon agricultural trust partners with farmers and ranchers to protect agricultural lands for the benefit of oregons economy, communities, and landscapes.

Environment
2
Lane Community College Education Association

Lane Community College Education Association is the union that represents 200 full-time and 375 part-time faculty members at Lane Community College in Eugene, Oregon. LCCEA is an affiliated unit of the Oregon Education Association (OEA)…

—
3
Portland State University Foundation

Portland state university foundation is responsible for raising and managing private resources to advance psu's priorities and mission to be a leading urban university.

—
4
Lewis & Clark College

Lewis & clark is a premier private higher education institution offering an exceptional education in an inclusive environment. by fostering critical thinking, innovation, creativity, civic engagement, and leadership, both inside and…

Education
5
Oregon Energy Systems Technology and Research
Environment
6
Oregon Research Institute

Oregon research institute is an independent behavioral sciences research center dedicated to understanding human behavior and improving the quality of human life through the prevention and treatment of health, educational, and social…

Social Science
7
Western Rivers Conservancy

Western rivers conservancy's mission is to protect outstanding river ecosystems in the western united states. continued on schedule o.we acquire land to conserve critical habitat, provide public access for compatible use and enjoyment, and…

Environment
8
Oregon Natural Resources Council Fund Oregon Wild

Oregon Wild works to protect and restore Oregon's wildlands, wildlife and waters as an enduring legacy for future generations.

Environment
9
Agricultural Research Foundation

Our mission is to encourage facilitate support and engage in scientific investigation and research experimentation and to advance educational and training activities related to agriculture and natural resources throughout the state of…

—
10
Southern Oregon Land Conservancy Inc

To conserve and enhance land in southern oregon to sustain our human and natural communities forever.

Environment
11
Washington State University Foundation

The mission of the Foundation is to promote, accept, and maximize private support for programs, initiatives, and properties of Washington State University and its regional campuses. The Foundation also prudently manages, invests, and…

Education
12
Northwest Conference

Through its values, the northwest conference unites its member colleges and universities in the pacific northwest to empower student-athletes in their pursuit of academic and athletic excellence at the division iii level.

Recreation & Sports
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Oregon Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Pacific Legal Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/26
Grantees still filing
15/26
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF OREGON FOUNDATION: $4,585,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF OREGON FOUNDATIONLANE COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $642,080 · EducationLANE COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATIONThe University Foundation California State University Chico: $205,000 · Education+4 more: $203,500 · EducationEUGENE CIVIC ALLIANCE: $1,125,000 · Recreation & SportsEUGENE CIVIC ALL…+1 more: $15,000 · Recreation & SportsTHE JOHN G SHEDD INSTITUTE: $250,000 · OtherTHE JOHN G…UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION - CHICO: $200,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY…UNIVERSITY OF OREGON DUCK ATHLETIC FUND: $125,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY…EVERGREEN FREEDOM FOUNDATION: $55,000 · OtherEVERGREEN …+15 more: $129,500 · Other+15 moreYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF EUGENE: $165,000 · Human Services+1 more: $1,000 · Human ServicesFRIENDS OF BUFORD PARK AND MT PISGAH: $51,000 · EnvironmentWESTERN RESOURCES LEGAL CENTER: $40,000 · EnvironmentWORLD FORESTRY CENTER: $32,000 · EnvironmentMcKenzie River Trust: $15,000 · EnvironmentTHE JOHN G SHEDD INSTITUTE FOR THE ARTS: $75,000 · Arts & CultureFANCONI CANCER FOUNDATION: $12,000 · HealthSERENITY LANE: $7,500 · Health
Education$5,635,580Recreation & Sports$1,140,000Other$759,500Human Services$166,000Environment$138,000Arts & Culture$75,000Health$19,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF OREGON FOUNDATION: $4,585,000 over 9y, 0.9% of budgetEUGENE CIVIC ALLIANCE: $1,125,000 over 6y, 8.1% of budgetLANE COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $642,080 over 9y, 4.1% of budgetThe University Foundation California State University Chico: $205,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetOregon State University Foundation: $185,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF EUGENE: $165,000 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetEVERGREEN FREEDOM FOUNDATION: $55,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF BUFORD PARK AND MT PISGAH: $51,000 over 5y, 2.4% of budgetWESTERN RESOURCES LEGAL CENTER: $40,000 over 8y, 1.0% of budgetWORLD FORESTRY CENTER: $32,000 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetMcKenzie River Trust: $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetEMERALD KIDSPORTS: $15,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetOSLC DEVELOPMENTS INC: $12,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED WAY OF LANE COUNTY: $12,500 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetFANCONI CANCER FOUNDATION: $12,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetOREGON LOGGING CONFERENCE FOUNDATION: $11,000 over 2y, 8.4% of budgetPacific Legal Foundation: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPACIFIC CREST COUNCIL INC BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $10,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetSERENITY LANE: $7,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSpringfield Education Foundation: $6,500 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF OREGON AND SW WASHINGTON INC: $5,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetRELIEF NURSERY INC: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFUTURE NATURAL RESOURCE LEADERS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetPARENTING NOW: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF OREGON FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds EUGENE CIVIC ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds LANE COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds The University Foundation California State University Chico ↗
  • Who funds Oregon State University Foundation ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF EUGENE ↗
  • Who funds THE JOHN G SHEDD INSTITUTE FOR THE ARTS ↗
  • Who funds EVERGREEN FREEDOM FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF BUFORD PARK AND MT PISGAH ↗
  • Who funds WESTERN RESOURCES LEGAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds WORLD FORESTRY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds McKenzie River Trust ↗
  • Who funds EMERALD KIDSPORTS ↗
  • Who funds OSLC DEVELOPMENTS INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF LANE COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds FANCONI CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds OREGON LOGGING CONFERENCE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Pacific Legal Foundation ↗
  • Who funds PACIFIC CREST COUNCIL INC BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds SERENITY LANE ↗
  • Who funds Springfield Education Foundation ↗
  • Who funds JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF OREGON AND SW WASHINGTON INC ↗
  • Who funds RELIEF NURSERY INC ↗
  • Who funds FUTURE NATURAL RESOURCE LEADERS ↗
  • Who funds Hosea Youth Services ↗
  • Who funds PARENTING NOW ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Oregon Community FoundationOR39.9× affinity20 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Oregon Community Foundation · The Ford Family Foundation · Chambers Family Foundation · Reed Family Foundation Inc · United Way of Lane County · Occu Foundation Inc · Tykeson Family Charitable Trust · The Coeta and Donald Barker Foundation · The Woodard Family Foundation · M J Murdock Charitable Trust · The Nb and Jacqueline Giustina Foundation · The Mehlum Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Giustina Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Giustina Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 90%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • United Way of Lane County: 31% of income from government
  • Relief Nursery Inc: 30% of income from government
  • Friends of Buford Park and Mt Pisgah: 14% of income from government
  • McKenzie River Trust: 8% of income from government
  • Future Natural Resource Leaders: 2% of income from government
  • Parenting Now: 1% of income from government
  • World Forestry Center: 0% of income from government
  • Oregon State University Foundation: 0% of income from government
  • Serenity Lane: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
9get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Giustina Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Giustina Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Giustina’s filings →

More from the funding graph