How much did GIRL SCOUTS OF THE UNITED STATES OF grant in FY2023?

GIRL SCOUTS OF THE UNITED STATES OF reported 109 grants totaling $8,583,881 in its FY2023 IRS filing.

Where is GIRL SCOUTS OF THE UNITED STATES OF based?

GIRL SCOUTS OF THE UNITED STATES OF is based in NY.

GIRL SCOUTS OF THE UNITED STATES OF

Foundation Dossiers Mostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →

· Public charity

GIRL SCOUTS OF THE UNITED STATES OF

Girl scouting builds girls of courage, confidence, and character.

$8.6M

Granted FY2023

109

Grants

Communities

$2.8M

Largest

01What you fund

0181% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2018–2023.

Youth Development$32MEnvironment$55kOther$7.8M

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2019

fulfillment

2020

fulfilment

2021

fulfillment

2022

fulfillment

2023

fulfillment

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2023 · 109 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2023

Under $10k14 grants · $117k
$10k–50k73 grants · $1.8M
$50k–250k20 grants · $1.8M
$250k+2 grants · $3.1M

$24,936

Median grant

States reached

$256M

Total assets

Largest grants

GS OF CENTRAL INDIANA$2,812,712
GS HEART OF NEW JERSEY$281,264
GS HORNETS NEST COUNCIL$150,323
GS OF WEST CENTRAL FLORIDA$146,782
GS OF EASTERN MASSACHUSETTS$143,059
GS ARIZONA CACTUS PINE$120,279
GS OF EASTERN IOWA & WESTERN ILLINOIS$109,048
GS OF CALIFORNIA'S CENTRAL COAST$104,349
GS OF SOUTHWEST TEXAS$87,600
GS OF MONTANA AND WYOMING$83,957
GS OF CENTRAL & WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS$83,041
GS OF NORTH EAST OHIO$82,037
GS OF NE KANSAS & NW MISSOURI$81,586
GS OF ORANGE COUNTY$79,661
GS OF COLORADO$74,435

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY18–23) land where the poverty rate runs at 12% — the area typically sits at 10%. 70% of your dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$40M · 109 repeat orgs$17k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +10% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

109 repeat relationships — 107 still active in FY2023, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

109

Total granted

$40M

$17k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+10%

Still filing today

94%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Youth DevelopmentEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

GO
GS of Central Indiana
6× · 2018–2023 · $3.3M · revenue +157%
GO
GS of Colorado
6× · 2018–2023 · $1.1M · revenue +29%
GC
Greater Chicago and Northwest Indiana
6× · 2018–2023 · $1.1M · revenue +18%

Funded once

GS
Girl Scouts of the Florida Panhandle
one grant, 2018 · $17k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Girl Scouts of the United States of

Girl scouting builds girls of courage, confidence, and character.

Youth Development

Girl Scouts of Northern Indiana

Girl scouts of northern indiana-michiana, inc. builds girls of courage, confidence, and character. girls ages 5-17 work in partnership with caring adults to plan and participate in a wide range of activities that meet girls' needs and…

Youth Development

Girl Scouts of Central California South

Girl Scouting builds girls of courage, confidence, and character, who make the world a better place.

—

Girl Scouts of Southeastern Michigan

Girl scouts of southeastern michigan (gssem) is the local council chartered by girl scouts of the usa to provide girls with girl-led, girl-centered, fun-filled quality leadership experiences, supported by mentoring adults. girl scout…

Youth Development

Girl Scouts of Southern Arizona

Girl scouts develops girls of courage, confidence and character who make the world a better place.

Youth Development

Girl Scouts of Northern New Jersey

Girl scouts of northern new jersey builds girls of courage, confidence, and character who make the world a better place.

Unclassified

Girl Scouts of Orange County

Nearly 15,000 oc girl scouts gained leadership skills & values necessary for success in the 21st century.

Youth Development

Girl Scouts of Mn and Wi River Valleys

Girl scouting builds girls of courage, confidence, and character, who make the world a better place. the girl scout program encourages healthy choices, independence, positive decision-making, and self-reliance. girl scouts are able to…

Youth Development

Farthest North Girl Scout Council

Provide the opportunity for girl scouting throughout northern alaska. inspire girls with the ideals of character, conduct, patriotism and service.

—

Grand Canyon Council Inc Boy Scouts of

The mission of scouting america is to prepare young people to make ethical and moral choices over their lifetimes by instilling in them the values of the scout oath and law.

—

Girl Scout Council of the Southern

To build girls of courage, confidence, and character who make the world a better place.

Youth Development

Boy Scouts of America 96 Central Ga

The boy scouts of america prepares young people to make ethical and moral choices over their lifetime by instilling in them the values of the scout oath and law.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Girl Scouts of Northern California and the most unlike its peers is Girl Scouts of San Jacinto Council. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 67 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.9% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.9%1/110

the rest of the field

11%

206,163/1,819,455

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

104 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

103/104

Grantees still filing

71/104

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Youth Development$32,148,099Other$7,779,993Environment$54,943

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Illumina Corporate FoundationDE32.3× affinity13 shared granteesties to 9 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Illumina Corporate Foundation · Pwc Foundation Inc · Aetna Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Foundation Inc · Wounded Warriors Family Support Inc · Verizon Foundation · Cvs Foundation · Lumen Clarke M Williams Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Union Pacific Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · The Allstate Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation GIRL SCOUTS OF THE UNITED STATES OF funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

12get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: GS of Connecticut.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~23 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 5 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

5 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 3.2× since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 060646756 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on GS of Connecticut, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 23 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 79% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Girl Scouts of the United States Of?

Find your warmest path to Girl Scouts of the United States Of through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

GIRL SCOUTS OF THE UNITED STATES OF

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

104 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Girl Scouts of the United States Of?

More from the funding graph

GIRL SCOUTS OF THE UNITED STATES OF

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

104 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Girl Scouts of the United States Of?

More from the funding graph