Skip to content
Giordano-Lampitelli Family Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Giordano-Lampitelli Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$6k
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
9
States reached
$1k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

International$15kHealth$7kAnimals$5kEducation$2kReligion$2kHuman Services$1kYouth Development$815Community Improvement$300Other$0
02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$400
Median grant
9
States reached
$13k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HEIFER INTERNATIONAL$1,050
SMILE TRAIN$1,000
ST ANN'S SCHOOL$1,000
BEST FRIENDS$815
EHHI$500
GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND$400
CHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT$300
FOCUS$250
MERCY SHIPS$200
SAVE THE CHILDREN$200
FEED THE CHILDREN$200
ST LABRE INDIAN SCHOOL$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 57% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $400 → 9%Unbound: $250 → 16%CHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT: $400 → 26%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $400 → 9%CHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT: $300 → 26%Christian Appalachian Project: $100 → 26%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MT
IL
MI
NY
MA
IN
CT
RI
CA
CO
KY
MD
KS
AR
TN
NC
DC
OK
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$29k · 13 repeat orgs$6k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +34% since the first grant, against +32% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
14

Total granted

$29k
$4k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+32%

Still filing today

54%
71%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
AnimalsHuman ServicesInternationalHealthPhilanthropyReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Save The Children Federation Inc
    4× · 2021–2024 · $2k · revenue +1%
  • HW
    HOPELINE WOMEN'S CENTER INC
    5× · 2018–2022 · $2k · revenue +72%
  • SMILE TRAIN INC
    2× · 2022–2024 · $2k · revenue +2%

Funded once

  • CC
    Covenant Church of Easton
    one grant, 2017 · $900
  • BF
    Best Friends Animal Society
    one grant, 2022 · $765
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $500
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Global Animal Partnership
Animals
2
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals Inc

Protection of animal rights

Animals
3
Humane World for Animals International

HUMANE WORLD FOR ANIMALS INTERNATIONAL, FKA HUMANE SOCIETY INTERNATIONAL (HSI), works around the globe to promote the human-animal bond, rescue and protect dogs and cats, improve farm animal welfare, protect wildlife, promote animal-free…

Animals
4
Animal Wellness Action

To prevent cruelty to animals, we promote enacting and enforcing good public policies. enacting good laws depends upon electing good lawmakers, and we remind voters which candidates care about and support animal issues.

Human Services
5
New Hampshire Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

To save the lives of animals through rescue, rehabilitation and adoption; to promote learning, eliminate animal cruelty and be a leader in advancing the highest standards in animal welfare.

Animals
6
Four Paws International Inc

Our vision is a world where humans treat animals with respect, empathy and understanding. four paws mission is to be the strong, global and independent voice for animals.

Animals
7
World Animal Protection

World animal protection is a global organization working to end factory farming and wildlife exploitation. we expose cruel systems, promote animal-friendly alternatives, and influence policy change. for over 75 years, we've been rewriting…

Animals
8
Lucky Dog Animal Rescue

Lucky dog animal rescue is a volunteer-powered nonprofit dedicated to rescuing homeless, neglected, and abandoned animals from certain euthanasia and finding them loving forever homes. we educate the community and all pet owners on…

Animals
9
Florida Pointer Rescue Inc

Rescue pointer dogs and treat back to health and f

Animals
10
Happy Doggo

The organization will address the global street dog problem through sterilization, vaccination, critical medical care, and re-homing of sick, injured, and abused dogs.

Animals
11
American Humane Association

Founded in 1877, american humane association, dba american humane society (american humane) is committed to ensuring the safety, welfare and well-being of animals. our leadership programs are first to serve in promoting and nurturing the…

Animals
12
Hope for China Dogs Rescue

At Hope for China Dogs, we are committed to combating the cruel and inhumane practice of the dog meat trade in China. We believe that every dog deserves to live a life free from pain and suffering, and we are dedicated to rescuing and…

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Project K9 Hero; the most unlike its peers is Hopeline Women's Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/20
Grantees still filing
15/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Heifer International: $12,170 · OtherHeifer InternationalEHHI: $2,200 · OtherEHHIST ANN'S SCHOOL: $2,000 · OtherST ANN'S SCHOOLHOPELINE WOMEN'S CENTER INC: $1,850 · OtherHOPELINE WOMEN'S CENTER INCJP Farm Animal Sanctuary: $1,750 · OtherJP Farm Animal SanctuarySMILE TRAIN INC: $1,500 · OtherSMILE TRAIN INCCovenant Church of Easton: $900 · Other+8 more: $4,080 · Other+8 moreGUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesGUIDE DOG…CHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT INC: $800 · Human ServicesCHRISTIAN…GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC: $800 · Human ServicesGUIDING E…Unbound: $250 · Human ServicesUnboundSave The Children Federation Inc: $2,110 · InternationalFEED THE CHILDREN INC: $200 · InternationalMercy Ships International: $200 · InternationalTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $1,000 · AnimalsPROTECTING K9 HEROES NFP LTD: $400 · AnimalsPROVIDENCE ANIMAL RESCUE LEAGUE INC: $250 · AnimalsCONNECTICUT HUMANE SOCIETY: $250 · AnimalsPROJECT K9 HERO: $100 · Animals+1 more: $50 · AnimalsCARCINOID CANCER FOUNDATION: $300 · HealthSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $100 · ReligionMARA ELEPHANT PROJECT USA INC: $100 · Philanthropy
Other$26,450Human Services$2,850International$2,510Animals$2,050Health$300Religion$100Philanthropy$100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $2,110 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHOPELINE WOMEN'S CENTER INC: $1,850 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT INC: $800 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC: $800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPROTECTING K9 HEROES NFP LTD: $400 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCARCINOID CANCER FOUNDATION: $300 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPROVIDENCE ANIMAL RESCUE LEAGUE INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUnbound: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCONNECTICUT HUMANE SOCIETY: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFEED THE CHILDREN INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMercy Ships International: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN KIDNEY FUND INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHEAST ANIMAL SHELTER INC: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT K9 HERO: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARA ELEPHANT PROJECT USA INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTURNING POINTE DONKEY RESCUE INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bank of America C…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC8.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Giordano-Lampitelli Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Giordano-Lampitelli Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 30%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
  • Feed the Children Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Giordano-Lampitelli Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home