Skip to content

· Private foundation

Gifford Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$87k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$292kEnvironment$126kHealth$12kFood & Nutrition$11kAnimals$10kHuman Services$9kYouth Development$3kHousing & Shelter$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k14 grants · $22k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $15k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$1,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$949k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JOSLYN ART MUSEUM$50,000
NATURE CONSERVANCY$15,000
MUSEUM OF NEBRASKA ART$5,515
WASHINGTON PRINT FOUNDATION$5,000
ALI FORNEY CENTER$1,000
OMEGA HORSE RESCUE & REHABILITATION CENTER$1,000
EMMANUEL CANCER FOUNDATION$1,000
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN$1,000
MEND HUNGER RELIEF NETWORK$1,000
INTERFAITH FOOD PANTRY OF THE ORANGES$1,000
YMCA OF GREATER OMAHA$1,000
SEGUE FOUNDATION$1,000
QUAHOG BAY CONSERVANCY$1,000
AMA ANIMAL RESCUE$1,000
FILM STREAMS$885
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 44% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%SAM & DEVORAH FOUNDATION FOR TRANS YOUTH: $1k → 4%SAM & DEVORAH FOUNDATION FOR TRANS YOUTH: $1k → 4%SAM & DEVORAH FOUNDATION FOR TRANS YOUTH: $500 → 4%Sam Devorah Foundation for Trans Yo: $500 → 4%Sam Devorah Foundation for Trans Yo: $400 → 4%Sam Devorah Foundation for Trans Yo: $400 → 4%YMCA OF GREATER OMAHA: $1k → 12%YMCA OF GREATER OMAHA: $1k → 12%YMCA OF GREATER OMAHA: $1k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
IL
NY
MA
PA
NJ
CA
CO
NE
WV
VA
DC
OK
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$410k · 29 repeat orgs$18k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +29% since the first grant, against +3% for those funded once.

29 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 19 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

29
13

Total granted

$410k
$13k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
+3%

Still filing today

66%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureAnimalsEnvironmentHuman ServicesFood & NutritionCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JA
    JOSLYN ART MUSEUM
    4× · 2019–2025 · $128k · revenue +174%
  • FF
    FONTENELLE FOREST
    4× · 2019–2024 · $74k · revenue +8%
  • MO
    MUSEUM OF NEBRASKA ART
    7× · 2019–2025 · $64k · revenue +226%

Funded once

  • CS
    CITY SPROUTS INC
    one grant, 2023 · $3k · revenue +6%
  • FW
    FALLINGWATER WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA CONSERVANCY
    one grant, 2023 · $2k
  • BB
    BROOKLYN BOTANIC GARDEN CORPORATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $2k · revenue +53%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Museum of Arts and Design

To collect, display and interpret objects in craft art and design.

Arts & Culture
2
Natural Areas Conservancy Inc

The natural areas conservancy champions urban natural areas in new york city and across the nation through innovative research, partnerships, and advocacy. we increase the health and resilience of urban forests and wetlands, catalyze…

Environment
3
Environmental Investigation Agency

To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.

International
4
Museum of American Finance

Finance impacts everyone. as a socially relevant organization, the museum of american finance seeks to improve understanding of the influence of financial institutions and capital markets on the u.s. and global economies, and on…

—
5
New Orleans Museum of Art

The mission of the new orleans museum of art is to inspire the love of art; to collect, preserve, exhibit and present excellence in the visual arts; to educate, challenge and engage a diverse public.

Arts & Culture
6
Animal Outlook Inc

Animal outlook is a national animal protection organization working to end the abuse of farmed animals using a variety of strategies, including investigations, legal advocacy, corporate and food system reform, and vegan outreach.

Animals
7
Aquarium of the Pacific Corporation

The aquarium of the pacific's mission is to instill a sense of wonder, respect, and stewardship for the pacific ocean, its inhabitants, and ecosystems.

Animals
8
Mercy for Animals Inc

Mercy for animals' mission is to construct a compassionate food system that is not just kind to animals but essential for the future of our planet and all who share it. our vision of a world where animals are respected, protected, and free…

Animals
9
Amazon Conservation Association

Amazon conservation unites science, people, and innovation to protect the amazon - the greatest wild forest on earth. as guardians of the most iconic forest on the planet, we bring together the power of the latest science and technology…

Environment
10
Marin Humane Society

Marin humane transforms lives through exceptional animal care, humane education, and advocacy. every day, marin humane inspires compassion and positive relationships between people and animals.

Animals
11
United States Artists Inc

To invest in america's finest artists and illuminate the value of artists to society.

Arts & Culture
12
Food & Water Watch

Food & water watch conducts extensive research and public education to ensure the food and water we consume is safe, accessible and sustainably produced. so we can all enjoy and trust in what we eat and drink, we help people take charge of…

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Goats of Anarchy Inc; the most unlike its peers is John Doe Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

32 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 32 of the 48 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
30/32
Grantees still filing
21/32
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JOSLYN ART MUSEUM: $128,000 · Arts & CultureJOSLYN ART MUSEUMMUSEUM OF NEBRASKA ART: $64,365 · Arts & CultureMUSEUM OF NEBRASKA ARTTHE WILLA CATHER FOUNDATION: $41,000 · Arts & CultureTHE WILLA CATHER FOUNDATION+2 more: $5,800 · Arts & CultureFONTENELLE FOREST: $74,000 · OtherFONTENELLE FORESTTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $41,000 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCYFilm Streams Foundation: $22,500 · OtherFilm Streams FoundationWASHINGTON PRINT FOUNDATION: $14,000 · OtherWASHINGTON PRINT FOUNDATIONARTISTS IN RESIDENCE INC: $12,400 · OtherARTISTS IN RESIDENCE INC+26 more: $38,751 · Other+26 moreSam & Devorah Foundation For Trans Youth: $3,800 · Human ServicesYMCA OF GREATER OMAHA: $3,000 · Human ServicesOMEGA HORSE RESCUE AND REHABILITATION CENTER INC: $3,700 · AnimalsAMA Animal Rescue Incorporated: $1,000 · AnimalsSAVE THE MANATEE CLUB INC: $900 · AnimalsLuvin Arms: $500 · AnimalsGOATS OF ANARCHY INC: $250 · AnimalsQuahog Bay Conservation: $4,000 · EnvironmentBROOKLYN BOTANIC GARDEN CORPORATION: $1,500 · EnvironmentCommunity Food Bank Of New Jersey Inc: $3,700 · Food & NutritionINTERFAITH FOOD PANTRY OF THE ORANGES: $1,000 · Food & NutritionCITY SPROUTS INC: $2,950 · Community Improvement
Arts & Culture$239,165Other$202,651Human Services$6,800Animals$6,350Environment$5,500Food & Nutrition$4,700Community Improvement$2,950

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJOSLYN ART MUSEUM: $128,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetFONTENELLE FOREST: $74,000 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetMUSEUM OF NEBRASKA ART: $64,365 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetTHE WILLA CATHER FOUNDATION: $41,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $41,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetARTISTS IN RESIDENCE INC: $12,400 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetTHE EMMANUEL CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $4,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetQuahog Bay Conservation: $4,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetSam & Devorah Foundation For Trans Youth: $3,800 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetOMEGA HORSE RESCUE AND REHABILITATION CENTER INC: $3,700 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetCommunity Food Bank Of New Jersey Inc: $3,700 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetKENTLER INTERNATIONAL DRAWING SPACE INC: $3,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetYMCA OF GREATER OMAHA: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCITY SPROUTS INC: $2,950 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMuseum of Modern Art: $2,800 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFILM STREAMS INC: $2,785 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetKESHET: $2,700 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTREVOR PROJECT INC: $1,800 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBROOKLYN BOTANIC GARDEN CORPORATION: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE DOE FUND INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINTERFAITH FOOD PANTRY OF THE ORANGES: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE SEGUE FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetSAVE THE MANATEE CLUB INC: $900 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLuvin Arms: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOPERATION SMILE INC: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKESHET INC: $400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGOATS OF ANARCHY INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JOSLYN ART MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds FONTENELLE FOREST ↗
  • Who funds MUSEUM OF NEBRASKA ART ↗
  • Who funds THE WILLA CATHER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds ARTISTS IN RESIDENCE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE EMMANUEL CANCER FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Quahog Bay Conservation ↗
  • Who funds Sam & Devorah Foundation For Trans Youth ↗
  • Who funds OMEGA HORSE RESCUE AND REHABILITATION CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Community Food Bank Of New Jersey Inc ↗
  • Who funds KENTLER INTERNATIONAL DRAWING SPACE INC ↗
  • Who funds YMCA OF GREATER OMAHA ↗
  • Who funds CITY SPROUTS INC ↗
  • Who funds Museum of Modern Art ↗
  • Who funds FILM STREAMS INC ↗
  • Who funds KESHET ↗
  • Who funds TREVOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds BROOKLYN BOTANIC GARDEN CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds AMA Animal Rescue Incorporated ↗
  • Who funds THE DOE FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds INTERFAITH FOOD PANTRY OF THE ORANGES ↗
  • Who funds ALI FORNEY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds JOHN DOE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE SEGUE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SAVE THE MANATEE CLUB INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Sherwood FoundationNE17.4× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Sherwood Foundation · Peter Kiewit Foundation · Robert B Daugherty Foundation · Nebraska Community Foundation · Lauritzen Foundation · Paul and Oscar Giger Foundation Inc · Union Pacific Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Gifford Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Gifford Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Keshet Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Gifford Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Gifford Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 48 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Gifford’s filings →

More from the funding graph