Skip to content

· Private foundation

Giddens Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$290k
Granted FY2025still arriving
20
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
0187% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2025.

Religion$203kHuman Services$150kHealth$147kFood & Nutrition$65kAnimals$45kRecreation & Sports$40kEducation$8kCrime & Legal$8kOther$0
02FY2025 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $39k
  • $10k–50k14 grants · $251k
$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$6.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
St Elizabeth Ann Seaton$30,000
The Tooth Truck Inc$25,000
Ronald McDonald House of the Ozarks$25,000
Republic First Christian Church$25,000
Individual grant recipient$25,000
Arthritis Foundation Inc$24,000
Council of Churches Crosslines$20,000
Care to Learn$15,000
Victory Mission$12,000
Southwest Missouri Humane Society$10,000
The Arc of the Ozarks$10,000
Ozark Empire Fairgrounds Foundation$10,000
Ozark Food Harvest$10,000
The Kitchen Foundation Inc$10,000
Greene County Library Foundation$7,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $38k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%Developmental Center of the Ozarks: $8k → 15%Care to Learn: $15k → 15%CARE TO LEARN: $5k → 15%CARE TO LEARN: $5k → 15%CARE TO LEARN: $5k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$735k · 18 repeat orgs$35k to everyone else

18 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
1

Total granted

$735k
$6k

Still filing today

50%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $29k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesAnimalsFood & NutritionPhilanthropyCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AF
    ARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $64k · revenue +15%
  • OF
    OZARKS FOOD HARVEST INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $35k · revenue +29%
  • TK
    THE KITCHEN FOUNDATION INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $30k · revenue +25%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $6k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Humane Society of Douglas County

To feed, shelter, and provide medical care to abandoned and lost animals

Animals
2
Missouri Alliance for Animal Legislation

The missouri alliance for animal legislation is a non-profit organization lobbying full time to bring positive change for animals through the legislative process. our efforts are combined with the actions of concerned individuals, other…

—
3
Chain of Hope Kc

Outreach to help animals suffering in the urban core of kansas city.

Animals
4
Ozark Regional Share and Care

Provide basic human services such as food, clothing, shelter, medical, etc. for local people in need

Human Services
5
Arkansas Hunger Relief Alliance Inc

The alliance is a collaborative organization that works on behalf of arkansans facing hunger.

Food & Nutrition
6
Nova Center of the Ozarks Inc

Nova center of the ozarks, inc strives to make possible the potential for positive change in the quality of life for every individual with a developmental disability, regardless of the nature of that disability.

Human Services
7
The Food Bank of Northeast Arkansas

The food bank of northeast arkansas provides hunger relief to people in need in twelve counties in northeast arkansas by raising awareness, securing resources, and distributing food through a network of non-profit agencies and programs.

Human Services
8
Humane Society of Jefferson County Inc

The mission of the humane society of jefferson county is to improve the lives of animals in need through compassionate care, adoption, advocacy and education while also inspiring humane communities that foster kindness and respect for all.

Animals
9
Missouri Alliance for Animals

The mission of the missouri alliance for animals is to protect animals from abuse, neglect and inhumane treatment and to promote the welfare of animals through advocacy, education, research and investigations, promotion of humane public…

Animals
10
Heartland Humane Society of Missouri

Heartland Humane Society of Missouri is a 501 c3 non profit group of dedicated foster homes that gives abandoned abused and unwanted animals another chance for loving permanent homes through our adoption program following the no-kill…

Animals
11
Animal Lifeline of Iowa Inc

Animal lifeline is a special needs no kill animal shelter that helps dogs & cats that are abused, seriously ill, handicapped, pregnant & nursing moms, orphan babies that need to be bottle fed & abandoned. we provide vet care, surgery,…

Animals
12
Ozarks New Hope Inc

Provide integrated, patient-centered health services designed to meet the needs of all patients, regardless of ability to pay; help the healthcare industry better serve patients & community by promoting public health; supporting…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ozarks Food Harvest Inc; the most unlike its peers is Castaway Animals Rescue Effort. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
10/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

REPUBLIC FIRST CHRISTIAN CHURCH: $74,000 · OtherREPUBLIC FIRST CHRISTIAN CHURCHRonald McDonald House of the Ozarks: $72,266 · OtherRonald McDonald House of the OzarksSt Elizabeth Ann Seaton: $69,000 · OtherSt Elizabeth Ann SeatonCouncil of Churches Crosslines: $60,000 · OtherCouncil of Churches CrosslinesIndividual grant recipient: $45,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientVictory Mission: $42,000 · OtherVictory MissionOzark Empire Fairgrounds Foundation: $40,000 · OtherOzark Empire Fairgrounds FoundationTHE KITCHEN FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 · OtherTHE KITCHEN FOUNDATION INCARC OF THE OZARKS: $22,000 · OtherPEOPLE HELPING PEOPLE OF REPUBLIC MISSOURI INC: $20,000 · Other+4 more: $31,500 · Other+4 moreARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INC: $64,000 · HealthARTHRITIS FOUNDAT…THE TOOTH TRUCK INC: $55,000 · HealthTHE TOOTH TRUCK I…HUMANE SOCIETY OF SOUTHWEST MISSOURI: $25,000 · AnimalsCastaway Animals Rescue Effort: $20,000 · AnimalsCare to Learn: $30,000 · Human ServicesDEVELOPMENTAL CENTER OF THE OZARKS: $7,500 · Human ServicesOZARKS FOOD HARVEST INC: $35,000 · Food & NutritionNEWBORNS IN NEED INC: $20,000 · PhilanthropyCOURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF SOUTHWEST MISSOURI: $7,500 · Civil Rights
Other$505,766Health$119,000Animals$45,000Human Services$37,500Food & Nutrition$35,000Philanthropy$20,000Civil Rights$7,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INC: $64,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TOOTH TRUCK INC: $55,000 over 3y, 3.8% of budgetOZARKS FOOD HARVEST INC: $35,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE KITCHEN FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 over 4y, 3.7% of budgetCare to Learn: $30,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF SOUTHWEST MISSOURI: $25,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetARC OF THE OZARKS: $22,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNEWBORNS IN NEED INC: $20,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetCastaway Animals Rescue Effort: $20,000 over 4y, 1.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE TOOTH TRUCK INC ↗
  • Who funds OZARKS FOOD HARVEST INC ↗
  • Who funds THE KITCHEN FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Care to Learn ↗
  • Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF SOUTHWEST MISSOURI ↗
  • Who funds ARC OF THE OZARKS ↗
  • Who funds NEWBORNS IN NEED INC ↗
  • Who funds Castaway Animals Rescue Effort ↗
  • Who funds DEVELOPMENTAL CENTER OF THE OZARKS ↗
  • Who funds COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF SOUTHWEST MISSOURI ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of the Ozarks IncMO23.6× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of the Ozarks Inc · Cook Family Foundation · Musgrave Foundation · Commerce Bancshares Foundation · Robert M - Bobby - Allison Charitable Tr · The Charlie & Mary Beth O'Reilly Family Foundation · Tua J Elizabeth McCain Charitable · Ozarks Health Advocacy Foundation · The Turner Family Foundation · Mercy Health Springfield Communities · Stanley & Elaine Ball Charitable Tr · Larry P O'Reilly and Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Giddens Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Giddens Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Giddens Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Giddens Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Giddens Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph