Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Gibson Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$113k
Granted FY2025still arriving
44
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$13k
Largest
01What you fund
0191% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Philanthropy$201kEducation$177kPublic Benefit$157kReligion$103kFood & Nutrition$36kYouth Development$36kArts & Culture$24kEnvironment$22kOther$0
02FY2025 · 44 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k39 grants · $59k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $53k
$1,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$2.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
IU FOUNDATION$13,200
MARSHALL COUNTY COMMUNITY FDN$10,000
ST THOMAS EPISCOPAL CHURC$10,000
MARIAN UNIVERSITY-ANCILLA COLLEGE$10,000
MARSHALL COUNTY COMMUNITY FDN$10,000
Individual grant recipient$7,500
CULTIVATE FOOD RESCUE$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF MARS$5,000
WILD ROSE MOON$3,000
Individual grant recipient$2,500
Individual grant recipient$2,500
UNIVERSITY OF NORTHERN COLORADO$2,500
UNITED WAY OF MARSHALL COUNTY$2,500
MARSHALL COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMEN$2,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%BLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK: $1k → 15%BLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK: $1k → 15%BLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK: $1k → 15%BLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK: $1k → 15%BLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK: $1k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$630k · 42 repeat orgs$23k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +35% since the first grant, against -22% for the ones you funded once.

42 repeat relationships — 33 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

42
6

Total granted

$630k
$20k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
-22%

Still filing today

29%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationPhilanthropyCommunity ImprovementEmploymentArts & CultureHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Indiana University Foundation
    6× · 2020–2025 · $91k · revenue +162%
  • CC
    CULTIVATE CULINARY SCHOOL AND CATERING INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $19k · revenue +509%
  • WR
    WILD ROSE MOON INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $16k · revenue +153%

Funded once

  • AC
    ANCILLA COLLEGE
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • LC
    Logan Community Resources Incgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue +47%
  • EP
    ENCORE PERFORMING ARTS
    one grant, 2020 · $3k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Marshall Community Foundation

To help make the marshall area an even better place to live, work, and raise a family by attracting endowed funds from a wide range of donors, serving as a conduit for special projects, and distributing grants in support of innovative…

Philanthropy
2
United Way of Marshall County - Alabama Inc

Our mission is to improve lives by mobilizing people to care for one another in a voluntary, community-wide effort. this shall be done through expanding volunteerism, fundraising programs, as well as planning, supporting, providing, and…

Philanthropy
3
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
4
Marion Community Foundation

The mission of marion community foundation is to continually improve the marion area community through philanthropy, leadership, and civic engagement.

Philanthropy
5
Communities in Schools Indiana

Surround students with a community of support, empowering them to stay in school and achieve in life.

Youth Development
6
Marshalltown Community School District Foundation

To provide scholarships and aid to the marshalltown community school district.

7
Marshalltown Area United Way

To provide a mechanism to encourage charitable giving, to facilitate the distribution of gifts to member agencies that will enhance the quality of life for all marshall county residents.

Philanthropy
8
Marshall Chamber of Commerce

To promote business in marshall and the surrounding communitites and to promote a quality of life to support strong business.

9
Marshall University Foundation Incorporated

The organization's primary exempt purpose is to provide support to Marshall University by receiving, investing and administering private resources.

Education
10
Marshalltown Chamber of Commerce

To be a leader and partner for business and quality of life initiatives in teh marshalltown area.

11
Child Care Centers of Marshfield Inc

The organization's primary mission is to provide child care and a child and adult care food program for the city of marshfield and the surrounding communities.

Human Services
12
Marshall Public Education Foundatio

To promote and enhance academic programs offered by the marshall public school district through monetary support of academic programs and scholarships for students in the district.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of Marshall County Inc and the most unlike its peers is Adams Street Ministries Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 43 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number19%0%<5yr14%5%5–10yr18%20%10–20yr15%15%20–35yr14%35%35–55yr21%25%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value19%0%<5yr14%1%5–10yr18%18%10–20yr15%2%20–35yr14%73%35–55yr21%7%55yr+

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/22
the rest of the field
12%
219/1,785

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 52 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/18
Grantees still filing
9/18
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

PUTNAM COUNTY FOUNDATION — $134,000 · OtherPUTNAM COUNTY FOUNDATIONST THOMAS EPISCOPAL CHURC — $57,000 · OtherST THOMAS EPISCOPAL CHURCIndividual grant recipient — $45,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientMARIAN UNIVERSITY-ANCILLA COLLEGE — $31,250 · OtherMARIAN UNIVERSITY-ANCILLA COLLEGEBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF MARS — $30,000 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF MARSIndividual grant recipient — $25,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientUNIVERSITY OF NORTHERN COLORADO — $22,500 · Other+33 more — $122,850 · Other+33 moreMARSHALL COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $180,000 · PhilanthropyMARSHALL COUNTY COMMUNITY F…UNITED WAY OF MARSHALL COUNTY INC — $15,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF MARSHALL COUN…+1 more — $6,000 · PhilanthropyIndiana University Foundation — $91,200 · EducationIndiana Unive…Culver Educational Foundation — $6,000 · EducationCulver Educat…+2 more — $3,250 · EducationMARSHALL COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $12,000 · Community ImprovementMarshall County Neighborhood Council — $12,000 · Community ImprovementCULTIVATE CULINARY SCHOOL AND CATERING INC — $19,000 · EmploymentWILD ROSE MOON INC — $16,000 · Arts & CultureBLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK INC — $5,000 · Human Services
Other$467,600Philanthropy$201,000Education$100,450Community Improvement$24,000Employment$19,000Arts & Culture$16,000Human Services$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMARSHALL COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $180,000 over 6y, 3.0% of budgetIndiana University Foundation — $91,200 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCULTIVATE CULINARY SCHOOL AND CATERING INC — $19,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetWILD ROSE MOON INC — $16,000 over 6y, 4.8% of budgetUNITED WAY OF MARSHALL COUNTY INC — $15,000 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetMARSHALL COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $12,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetMarshall County Neighborhood Council — $12,000 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetCulver Educational Foundation — $6,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF ST JOSEPH COUNTY INC — $6,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetBLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK INC — $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetLogan Community Resources Inc — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMarshall County Humane Society Inc — $3,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetSigma Chi Foundation — $1,750 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetVASSILIADIS ELEMENTARY PTO — $1,500 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetCRIME STOPPERS INC — $1,250 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetCULVER COMMUNITY YOUTH CENTER FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetLake Maxinkuckee Environmental Fund Inc — $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetADAMS STREET MINISTRIES INC — $800 over 4y, 0.5% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MARSHALL COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds Indiana University Foundation
  • Who funds CULTIVATE CULINARY SCHOOL AND CATERING INC
  • Who funds WILD ROSE MOON INC
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF MARSHALL COUNTY INC
  • Who funds MARSHALL COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
  • Who funds Marshall County Neighborhood Council
  • Who funds Culver Educational Foundation
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF ST JOSEPH COUNTY INC
  • Who funds BLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK INC
  • Who funds Logan Community Resources Inc
  • Who funds Marshall County Humane Society Inc
  • Who funds Sigma Chi Foundation
  • Who funds VASSILIADIS ELEMENTARY PTO

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Marshall County Community Foundation IncIN26.3× affinity10 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Marshall County Community Foundation Inc · 1st Source Bank Foundation Inc Xxx-Xx-Xxxx · Community Foundation of St Joseph County Inc · Nisource Charitable Foundation · Lilly Endowment Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Gibson Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Gibson Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Gibson Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 52 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph