Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Gibbons Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$28k
Granted FY2025still arriving
22
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Education$58kFood & Nutrition$43kEnvironment$20kHuman Services$15kHealth$13kAnimals$4kArts & Culture$4kInternational$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$400
Median grant
6
States reached
$303k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Utah Food Bank$8,000
Rowland Hall St Marks School$7,000
Judge Memorial Catholic High School$3,000
Henrys Fork Foundation$2,000
NDRC$1,200
Planned Parenthood$1,200
Neighborhood House$1,000
Hunstman Cancer Institute$1,000
The McGilllis School$1,000
Breakthrough T1D$500
NPR$400
Salt Lake Arts Academy$250
South Valley Services$200
KUER$200
Individual grant recipient$200
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%South Valley Services: $200 → 8%South Valley Services: $200 → 8%Neighborhood House: $3k → 8%Neighborhood House: $3k → 8%Neighborhood House: $2k → 8%Neighborhood House: $1k → 8%Neighborhood House: $1k → 8%Neighborhood House: $1k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ID
MT
NY
CA
UT
VA
MD
AZ
DC
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$145k · 24 repeat orgs$14k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +53% since the first grant, against +50% for the ones you funded once.

24 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
14

Total granted

$145k
$12k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+53%
+50%

Still filing today

42%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsEducationHuman ServicesEnvironmentInternationalHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UF
    UTAH FOOD BANK
    6× · 2020–2025 · $43k · revenue +53%
  • RH
    ROWLAND HALL-ST MARK'S SCHOOL
    5× · 2021–2025 · $35k · revenue +84%
  • HF
    HENRYS FORK FOUNDATION INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $12k · revenue +146%

Funded once

  • RH
    Rowland Hall School
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
  • HC
    Huntsmen Cancer Institute
    one grant, 2020 · $2k
  • NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $1k · revenue +26%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Healthy Environment Alliance of Utah

Heal utah's mission is to protect utah's environment and its people by promoting clean air, clean energy, and comprehensive solutions to radioactive and toxic waste.

Environment
2
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
3
Idaho Conservation League Inc

Icl's mission is to create a conservation community and pragmatic, enduring solutions that protect and restore the air you breathe, the water you drink, and the land and wildlife you love.

4
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
5
Summit Land Conservancy

Summit land conservancy works with utah communities to conserve land and water for the benefit of the people and nature.

Environment
6
Tennessee Aquarium

The mission of the Tennessee Aquarium is to connect people with nature and empower them to make informed decisions about water and wildlife.

Animals
7
The Living Planet Inc

We inspire people to explore, discover and learn about earth's diverse ecosystems.

8
Utah Geological Foundation
9
Red River Zoological Society

As conservation leaders, the red river zoo connects our community to nature and inspires people to help save species.

Animals
10
Utah Foundation

Utah foundation's mission is to produce objective, thorough and well- reasoned research and analysis that promotes the effective use of public resources, a thriving economy, a well-prepared workforce and a high quality of life for utahns.…

Public Benefit
11
Utah Humanities Council

Utah Humanities collaborates with libraries, museums, historical societies, schools, colleges, and cultural and civic groups; provides capacity-building opportunities for volunteers and professionals in the cultural sector; presents…

Arts & Culture
12
National Kidney Foundation of Utah & Idaho

The National Kidney Foundation of Utah & Idaho, a major nonprofit health organization, is dedicated to preventing diseases of the kidney, improving the health and wellbeing of individuals and families affected by kidney disease, and…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Equality Utah and the most unlike its peers is Breakthrough T1D. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
14/17
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UTAH FOOD BANK — $43,000 · OtherUTAH FOOD BANKHENRYS FORK FOUNDATION INC — $12,000 · OtherHENRYS FORK FOUNDATION INCJudge Memorial Catholic High School — $8,000 · OtherJudge Memorial Catholic High SchoolNDRC — $5,600 · OtherNDRCRowland Hall School — $5,000 · OtherCosgriff School — $4,000 · OtherHuntsman Cancer Institute — $4,000 · OtherCATHOLIC COMMUNITY SERVICES OF UTAH — $3,500 · Other+22 more — $19,205 · Other+22 moreROWLAND HALL-ST MARK'S SCHOOL — $35,000 · EducationROWLAND HALL-ST MARK'S SCHO…THE MCGILLIS SCHOOL — $2,000 · Education+1 more — $1,000 · EducationNeighborhood House Association — $10,000 · Human ServicesSOUTH VALLEY SANCTUARY INC — $400 · Human ServicesBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY — $2,400 · AnimalsUtah Zoological Society — $1,000 · AnimalsUTAH ANIMAL ADVOCACY FOUNDATION — $200 · Animals+1 more — $100 · AnimalsNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC — $1,000 · EnvironmentREDFORD CENTER INC — $240 · EnvironmentPOLARIS PROJECT — $1,050 · InternationalBREAKTHROUGH T1D — $500 · HealthEQUALITY UTAH — $150 · Civil Rights
Other$104,305Education$38,000Human Services$10,400Animals$3,700Environment$1,240International$1,050Health$500Civil Rights$150

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUTAH FOOD BANK — $43,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetROWLAND HALL-ST MARK'S SCHOOL — $35,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHENRYS FORK FOUNDATION INC — $12,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetNeighborhood House Association — $10,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY — $2,400 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MCGILLIS SCHOOL — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPOLARIS PROJECT — $1,050 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSalt Lake Arts Academy — $1,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUtah Zoological Society — $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTH VALLEY SANCTUARY INC — $400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY — $400 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetREDFORD CENTER INC — $240 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUTAH ANIMAL ADVOCACY FOUNDATION — $200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBONEFISH & TARPON TRUST INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UTAH FOOD BANK
  • Who funds ROWLAND HALL-ST MARK'S SCHOOL
  • Who funds HENRYS FORK FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds Neighborhood House Association
  • Who funds BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY
  • Who funds THE MCGILLIS SCHOOL
  • Who funds POLARIS PROJECT
  • Who funds Salt Lake Arts Academy
  • Who funds NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC
  • Who funds Utah Zoological Society
  • Who funds BREAKTHROUGH T1D
  • Who funds SOUTH VALLEY SANCTUARY INC
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY
  • Who funds REDFORD CENTER INC
  • Who funds UTAH ANIMAL ADVOCACY FOUNDATION

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Willard L Eccles Charitable FoundationUT13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Willard L Eccles Charitable Foundation · Sorenson Legacy Foundation · The Community Foundation of Utah · American Express Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Gibbons Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 44 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph