Skip to content

· Private foundation

Gertrude E Hill Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$148k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$72k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$498kHealth$400kHuman Services$101kEnvironment$37kPublic Safety & Disaster$32kInternational$22kCommunity Improvement$6kCivil Rights$2k
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $22k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $55k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $72k
$4,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$465k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COLONIAL WILLIAMSBURG FOUNDATION$71,530
MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH$30,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$15,000
HONOR FLIGHT CHICAGO$10,000
BOTANIC GARDEN OF CHICAGO$5,000
SHRINERS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$4,000
SUSAN G KOMEN FOUNDATION$4,000
CHILDREN INTERNATIONAL$3,000
LAKE BLUFF HISTORY MUSEUM$2,000
ASPIRE$2,000
WOMEN UNITED$1,000
LF-LB SENIOR CITIZENS' FOUNDATION$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $92k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%HONOR FLIGHT CHICAGO: $10k → 14%HONOR FLIGHT CHICAGO: $10k → 14%HONOR FLIGHT CHICAGO: $10k → 14%HONOR FLIGHT CHICAGO: $10k → 14%ASPIRE: $2k → 14%HONOR FLIGHT CHICAGO: $10k → 14%HONOR FLIGHT CHICAGO: $10k → 14%HONOR FLIGHT CHICAGO: $10k → 14%HONOR FLIGHT CHICAGO: $10k → 14%HONOR FLIGHT CHICAGO: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
IA
IN
MO
VA
DC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 14 repeat orgs$6k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
3

Total granted

$1.1M
$4k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
+132%

Still filing today

64%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesArts & CultureInternationalEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Colonial Williamsburg Foundation
    9× · 2017–2025 · $484k · revenue +17%
  • THE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH
    9× · 2017–2025 · $263k · revenue +578%
  • HF
    Honor Flight Chicago Corp
    9× · 2017–2025 · $90k · revenue +31%

Funded once

  • CR
    COMIC RELIEF USA - HAND IN HAND-HURRICANE RELIEF FUND
    one grant, 2017 · $2k
  • CH
    CARMEL HIGH SCHOOL OVATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $1k · revenue +132%
  • ND
    NATIONAL DOWN SYNDROME SOCIETYgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $1k · revenue +50%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

—
2
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
3
Cystic Fibrosis Foundation

To cure cf and provide all people with cf the opportunity to lead long, fulfilling lives by funding research and drug development, partnering with the cf community, and advancing high-quality, specialized care.

Health
4
Target Als Foundation Inc

Our mission is to break down barriers to als research to find effective treatments. by uniting academia, the pharma and biotech industry, government, venture capital, related nonprofits, and the als community, we aim to overcome the…

Education
5
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
6
Global Down Syndrome Foundation

To significantly improve the lives of people with down syndrome through research, medical care, education and advocacy. an important part of this mission is to support the global affiliate organizations that we helped establish and…

Health
7
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health
8
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
9
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
10
American Academy of Neurology

The Academy's mission is to enhance member career fulfillment and promote brain health for all.

Community Improvement
11
National Science and Technology Medals Foundation Inc

The nstmf's mission is to build inclusive stem communities across the united states. fundamental to these communities are the significant, inspirational connections we foster between the individuals who have received national recognition…

—
12
National Multiple Sclerosis Society

We will cure ms while empowering people affected by ms to live their best lives.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Aspire of Illinois; the most unlike its peers is The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
10/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Colonial Williamsburg Foundation: $483,662 · Arts & CultureColonial Williamsburg Foundation+1 more: $13,530 · Arts & CultureTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $263,000 · HealthTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARK…SONGS BY HEART FOUNDATION: $70,000 · HealthSONGS BY HEART FOUNDATIONThe Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc: $28,000 · HealthThe Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Found…+1 more: $5,430 · HealthHonor Flight Chicago Corp: $90,000 · Human ServicesHonor Flight…American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $30,000 · Human ServicesAmerican Nat…+1 more: $2,000 · Human ServicesBOTANIC GARDEN OF CHICAGO: $37,000 · OtherBOTANIC G…SHRINERS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $33,000 · OtherSHRINERS …LF-LB SENIOR CITIZENS' FOUNDATION: $8,500 · OtherLF-LB SEN…RENEW COMMUNITIES: $6,000 · OtherRENEW COM…+3 more: $5,000 · Other+3 moreChildren International: $22,000 · InternationalCARMEL HIGH SCHOOL OVATION INC: $1,000 · Education
Arts & Culture$497,192Health$366,430Human Services$122,000Other$89,500International$22,000Education$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetColonial Williamsburg Foundation: $483,662 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $263,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetHonor Flight Chicago Corp: $90,000 over 9y, 0.9% of budgetSONGS BY HEART FOUNDATION: $70,000 over 4y, 3.8% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc: $28,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetChildren International: $22,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetLake Bluff History Museum: $13,530 over 9y, 2.2% of budgetACCESS COMMUNITY HEALTH NETWORK: $5,430 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetASPIRE OF ILLINOIS: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCARMEL HIGH SCHOOL OVATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetNATIONAL DOWN SYNDROME SOCIETY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Colonial Williamsburg Foundation ↗
  • Who funds THE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH ↗
  • Who funds Honor Flight Chicago Corp ↗
  • Who funds SONGS BY HEART FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds Children International ↗
  • Who funds Lake Bluff History Museum ↗
  • Who funds ACCESS COMMUNITY HEALTH NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds ASPIRE OF ILLINOIS ↗
  • Who funds CARMEL HIGH SCHOOL OVATION INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL DOWN SYNDROME SOCIETY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Gertrude E Hill Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Gertrude E Hill Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Gertrude E Hill Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Gertrude E Hill Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Gertrude E Hill’s filings →

    More from the funding graph