Skip to content

· Private foundation

Gerson Family Charitable Trust

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$196k
Granted FY2024still arriving
34
Grants FY2024still arriving
8
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
0182% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

International$167kPhilanthropy$142kReligion$87kArts & Culture$23kEducation$20kEnvironment$15kHealth$10kRecreation & Sports$10kOther$0
02FY2024 · 34 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k27 grants · $101k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $95k
$5,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$877k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$20,000
FRIDAY NIGHT SHABBAT$20,000
Individual grant recipient$15,000
BLACK SWAMP BIRD OBSERVATORY$10,000
FRIDAY NIGHT SHABBAT$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
BLACK SWAMP CONSERVANCY$10,000
JEWISH FEDERATION FO CINCINNATI$6,000
JEWISH FEDERATION OF CINCINNATI$6,000
HILLEL JEWISH STUDENT CENTER$6,000
PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC$5,000
AFMDA$5,000
BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION$5,000
CAMERA$5,000
JNS$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY21–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 97% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%CAMERA: $9k → 16%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF DAVID ADOM: $10k → 17%FOUNDATION OF DEFENSE OF DEMOCRACI: $3k → 14%JNS: $5k → 8%CHAI TOTS SCHOOL: $10k → 6%BLACK SWAMP BIRD OBSERVATORY: $10k → 10%HEBREW UNION COLLEGE: $10k → 16%CAMERA: $5k → 16%AFMDA: $5k → 17%BLACK SWAMP CONSERVANCY: $10k → 10%CHABAD AT UC: $10k → 16%CAMERA: $5k → 16%AFMDA: $5k → 17%BLACK SWAMP CONSERVANCY: $5k → 10%CHABAD AT UC: $8k → 16%CAMERA: $5k → 16%HILLEL JEWISH STUDENT CENTER: $6k → 16%AMERICAN JEWISH ARCHIVES: $5k → 16%CHABAD AT UC: $5k → 16%JEWISH NATIONAL FUND: $80k → 17%JEWISH FEDERATION FO CINCINNATI: $100k → 16%HADASSAH MEDICAL RELIEF: $18k → 17%ADATH ISRAEL CONGRAGATION: $15k → 16%HADASSAH MEDICAL RELIEF: $18k → 17%ADATH ISRAEL CONGRAGATION: $15k → 16%HADASSAH MEDICAL RELIEF: $8k → 17%ADATH ISRAEL CONGRAGATION: $11k → 16%HADASSAH MEDICAL RELIEF: $5k → 17%JEWISH FEDERATION FO CINCINNATI: $10k → 16%PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $5k → 17%JEWISH FEDERATION FO CINCINNATI: $6k → 16%BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION: $5k → 17%JEWISH FEDERATION OF CINCINNATI: $6k → 16%CAMP LIVINGSTON: $5k → 16%CHABAD JEWISH CENTER: $5k → 16%CAMP LIVINGSTON: $5k → 16%CHABAD JEWISH CENTER: $4k → 16%JEWISH CEMETERIES OF GREATER CINCIN: $5k → 16%FRIDAY NIGHT SHABBAT: $20k → 16%FRIDAY NIGHT CHABAD: $20k → 16%FRIDAY NIGHT SHABBAT: $10k → 16%FRIDAY NIGHT SHABBAT: $10k → 16%ISSAC M WISE TEMPLE: $5k → 16%CINCINNATI PLAYHOUSE IN THE PARK: $4k → 16%JEWISH NATIONAL FUND: $25k → 16%JEWISH NATIONAL FUND: $5k → 16%JEWISH NATIONAL FUND: $5k → 16%JEWISH NATIONAL FUND: $5k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
NY
MA
OR
OH
NJ
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 8% of Gerson Family Charitable Trust’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 64% of the giving stays in OH; by stated purpose, 59%.

Gerson Family Charitable Trustlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 4.6% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

75%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$328k · 16 repeat orgs$108k to everyone else

16 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
10

Total granted

$328k
$50k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+40%

Still filing today

31%
30%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $58k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
InternationalArts & CultureRecreation & SportsEnvironmentAnimalsReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CF
    COMMITTEE FOR ACCURACY IN MIDDLE EAST REPORTING IN AMERICA INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $26k · revenue +56%
  • BS
    BLACK SWAMP CONSERVANCY
    2× · 2023–2024 · $15k · revenue +11%
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM
    3× · 2022–2024 · $14k · revenue +190%

Funded once

  • CT
    CHAI TOTS SCHOOL
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • HU
    HEBREW UNION COLLEGE
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF DAVID ADOM
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Israel 21c

Through its news service and public programs, Israel 21c educates individuals and groups about comtemporary life in Israel providing news and information on the people of Israel, its culture and business and scientific achievements.

Education
2
The Jewish Foundation of Cincinnati
Philanthropy
3
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

—
4
JewishColumbus

Make Jewish life vibrant, accessible and secure in Columbus, Israel and around the world.

Religion
5
The Israel Innovation Fund Inc

Our vision is to reignite the zionist spirit and meet the needs of jewish civilization in the twenty-first century by connecting people around the world through the vibrancy and creativity of contemporary israeli culture.

Arts & Culture
6
Jewish Electorate Institute

The jewish electorate institute (jei) is an independent, non-partisan 501(c)(3) organization that surveys, interprets, reports, and educates the public about the perspectives, voting behaviors, and motivations of the american jewish…

Civil Rights
7
Hillel the Foundation of Jewish Campus Life

The purpose of Hillel is to be a center for enriching the lives of Jewish students in the Greater Cincinnati area and to strengthen Jewish identity through social and a broad range of programs and services in an atmosphere that is…

—
8
Agudath Israel of Ohio Inc

To unite all Jews in the spirit of the Torah, by various means, including, but not limited to disseminating information through publications, meetings, and seminars, and by cooperating with other charitable organizations to achieve these…

Human Services
9
Jewish Childrens Museum

To further jewish historical education among youths

Arts & Culture
10
Friends of Ir David Inc

To provide assistance to organizations in the old city of jerusalem and the ancient city of david.

International
11
Jewish Federation of Columbus

Make Jewish life vibrant, accessible and secure in Columbus, Israel and around the world.

Philanthropy
12
Jewish Federation of St Louis

Jewish federation of st. louis mobilizes the jewish community and its human and financial resources to preserve and enhance jewish life in st. louis, in israel and around the world.

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Birthright Israel Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Queen City Chamber Opera Dba Queen City Opera. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
10/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $49,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $41,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientFRIDAY NIGHT SHABBAT: $40,000 · OtherFRIDAY NIGHT SHABBATJEWISH NATIONAL FUND: $40,000 · OtherJEWISH NATIONAL FUNDIndividual grant recipient: $23,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $20,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCHABAD JEWISH CENTER: $18,000 · OtherUC FOUNDATION: $15,000 · Other+18 more: $94,734 · Other+18 moreJewish Federation of Cincinnati: $122,000 · PhilanthropyJewish Federation of C…PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $8,000 · PhilanthropyPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT F…JEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $80,000 · InternationalJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (…COMMITTEE FOR ACCURACY IN MIDDLE EAST REPORTING IN AMERICA INC: $26,000 · InternationalCOMMITTEE FOR ACCURACY…AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $14,000 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MA…BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION: $8,000 · InternationalBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUN…+1 more: $1,000 · InternationalBLACK SWAMP CONSERVANCY: $15,000 · EnvironmentCamp Livingston Inc: $10,000 · Recreation & SportsBLACK SWAMP BIRD OBSERVATORY: $10,000 · AnimalsCincinnati Playhouse in the Park: $3,600 · Arts & CultureQUEEN CITY CHAMBER OPERA DBA Queen City Opera: $3,000 · Arts & CultureFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC: $1,000 · Arts & CultureENSEMBLE THEATRE OF CINCINNATI: $1,000 · Arts & CultureZIONIST ORGANIZATION OF AMERICA: $3,000 · Religion
Other$340,734Philanthropy$130,000International$129,000Environment$15,000Recreation & Sports$10,000Animals$10,000Arts & Culture$8,600Religion$3,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJewish Federation of Cincinnati: $122,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $80,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMITTEE FOR ACCURACY IN MIDDLE EAST REPORTING IN AMERICA INC: $26,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetBLACK SWAMP CONSERVANCY: $15,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $14,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCamp Livingston Inc: $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetBLACK SWAMP BIRD OBSERVATORY: $10,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $8,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION: $8,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJewish Cemeteries of Greater Cincinnati Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCincinnati Playhouse in the Park: $3,600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetZIONIST ORGANIZATION OF AMERICA: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetQUEEN CITY CHAMBER OPERA DBA Queen City Opera: $3,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA COUNCIL 438 DAN BEARD: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCentral Fund of Israel: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetENSEMBLE THEATRE OF CINCINNATI: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Jewish Federation of Cincinnati ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMITTEE FOR ACCURACY IN MIDDLE EAST REPORTING IN AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds BLACK SWAMP CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM ↗
  • Who funds Camp Livingston Inc ↗
  • Who funds BLACK SWAMP BIRD OBSERVATORY ↗
  • Who funds PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC ↗
  • Who funds BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Jewish Cemeteries of Greater Cincinnati Inc ↗
  • Who funds Cincinnati Playhouse in the Park ↗
  • Who funds ZIONIST ORGANIZATION OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds QUEEN CITY CHAMBER OPERA DBA Queen City Opera ↗
  • Who funds BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA COUNCIL 438 DAN BEARD ↗
  • Who funds Central Fund of Israel ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC ↗
  • Who funds ENSEMBLE THEATRE OF CINCINNATI ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Carol Ann and Ralph V Haile Jr FoundationOH15.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Carol Ann and Ralph V Haile Jr Foundation · Johnson Charitable Gift Fund · John a Schroth Family Char Tr · Elsa M Heisel Sule Charitable Trust 2005 · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Baird Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Gerson Family Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Gerson Family Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 41 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Gerson Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph