Skip to content

· Private foundation

Geraldine & Roland Ford Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$82k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$51k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$316kEnvironment$222kReligion$168kEducation$30kHuman Services$14kInternational$12kArts & Culture$6kPublic Safety & Disaster$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $17k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $51k
$2,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EPWORTH CHURCH ASSOCIATION$51,000
FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$16,500
SAINT ANDREW SCHOOL$5,000
CHICAGO BOTANIC GARDEN$3,500
SAMARITANS PURSE$2,000
READING POWER$1,000
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY$1,000
MOORINGS PRESBYERIAN CHURCH$1,000
GORTON COMMUNITY CENTER$1,000
LAKE COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $14k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%GORTON COMMUNITY CENTER: $2k → 8%GORTON COMMUNITY CENTER: $2k → 8%GORTON COMMUNITY CENTER: $2k → 8%GORTON COMMUNITY CENTER: $2k → 8%GORTON COMMUNITY CENTER: $2k → 8%GORTON COMMUNITY CENTER: $2k → 8%GORTON COMMUNITY CENTER: $1k → 8%GORTON COMMUNITY CENTER: $1k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
WI
MI
CO
VA
MD
NC
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$751k · 17 repeat orgs$32k to everyone else

17 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
12

Total granted

$751k
$27k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
+43%

Still filing today

35%
58%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentHealthHuman ServicesArts & CultureFood & NutritionHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CH
    CHICAGO HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $221k · revenue +37%
  • GC
    Gorton Community Center
    8× · 2017–2025 · $14k · revenue +158%
  • RP
    READING POWER INC
    5× · 2018–2025 · $3k · revenue +166%

Funded once

  • AS
    ACTS SCHOOL OF FRONTIER MISSIONS
    one grant, 2019 · $10k
  • NM
    NORTHWESTERN MEDICINE LAKE FOREST HOSPITAL ONCOLOGY
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF LAKE FOREST PARKS & REC FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · $5k · revenue -87%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lake Forest Graduate School of Management

Lake Forest Graduate School of Management's mission is to bring the real world to business education and leadership development.

—
2
Chicago Parks Foundation

The Chicago Parks Foundation is a separate 501 (c) (3) non-profit organization that also serves as the strategic partner for the coordination of fundraising and charitable resources for the Chicago Park District.

Recreation & Sports
3
Lake Forest College

Provide post-secondary education leading to a baccalaureate degree. Program service expenditures are made in conjunction with the operation of a liberal arts college spread over 107 acres with approximately 63 educational and support…

Education
4
Lincoln Park Zoological Society

Lincoln park zoo is dedicated to connecting people with nature by providing a free, family-oriented wildlife experience in the heart of chicago and by advancing the highest quality of animal care, horticulture, education, science and…

Animals
5
North Shore Health Care Foundation

To expand equitable health care and healthy living in Cook County and champion solutions through funding, education and advocacy.

Health
6
Lakewood Heritage Foundation

To solicit and collect donations for the preservation and restoration of lakewood's natural resources, including its landscape, trees, gardens and lake, and its historic monuments, markers and buildings, and for related educational…

Community Improvement
7
Eastern National

Eastern national promotes the public's understanding and support of america's national parks and other public trust partners by providing quality educational experiences, products and services.

Recreation & Sports
8
Lakeshore Legal Aid

Standing with our neighbors, Lakeshore Legal Aid fights poverty and injustice through advocacy and by providing meaningful and dignified access to the legal system.

Crime & Legal
9
Land Conservancy of West Michigan

Our mission is conserving West Michigans ecologically critical land. We protect land by creating public nature preserves, providing support to communities and local governments in creating natural areas, and helping private landowners…

Environment
10
Glacial Lakes Conservancy Inc

Glacial Lakes Conservancy, as a land trust, is a nonprofit organization that, as part of its mission, actively works to conserve land by undertaking or assisting in land or conservation easement acquisitions.

Environment
11
Northwest Community Healthcare

NORTHWEST COMMUNITY HEALTHCARE follows the mission of Endeavor Health. The mission of Endeavor Health is to "help everyone in our communities be their best." Central to this mission is a commitment to providing clinical programs and…

Health
12
Chicago Public Education Fund

The chicago public education fund (the fund) is a nonprofit organization that improves public schools in chicago by investing in the talented educators who lead them.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Lake County Community Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Samaritan's Purse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/17
Grantees still filing
13/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NORTHWESTERN MEDICINE LAKE FOREST HOSPITAL: $134,000 · OtherNORTHWESTERN MEDICINE LAKE FOREST HOSPITALLAKE FOREST NORTHWESTERN HOSPITAL: $100,500 · OtherLAKE FOREST NORTHWESTERN HOSPITALFIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $78,000 · OtherFIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION MILWAUKEE: $73,000 · OtherCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION MILWAUKEEEPWORTH CHURCH ASSOCIATION: $71,200 · OtherEPWORTH CHURCH ASSOCIATIONMICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY: $22,000 · Other+19 more: $48,600 · Other+19 moreCHICAGO HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY: $221,000 · EnvironmentCHICAGO HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY+1 more: $700 · EnvironmentGorton Community Center: $14,000 · Human ServicesSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $12,000 · ReligionFRIENDS OF LAKE FOREST PARKS & REC FOUNDATION: $5,000 · Recreation & SportsREADING POWER INC: $3,250 · Youth DevelopmentEndeavor Health Clinical Operations: $2,750 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc: $100 · Health
Other$527,300Environment$221,700Human Services$14,000Religion$12,000Recreation & Sports$5,000Youth Development$3,250Health$2,850

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHICAGO HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY: $221,000 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetGorton Community Center: $14,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $12,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF LAKE FOREST PARKS & REC FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetHistory Center of Lake Forest-Lake Bluff: $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetREADING POWER INC: $3,250 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetEndeavor Health Clinical Operations: $2,750 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LAKE COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $1,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetLeadership Institute: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLAKE FOREST OPEN LANDS ASSOCIATION: $700 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetELAWA FARM FOUNDATION: $600 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Chicago Community Trust: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSARAH'S CIRCLE: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CHICAGO HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds Gorton Community Center ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF LAKE FOREST PARKS & REC FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds History Center of Lake Forest-Lake Bluff ↗
  • Who funds READING POWER INC ↗
  • Who funds Endeavor Health Clinical Operations ↗
  • Who funds THE LAKE COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GENEVA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Leadership Institute ↗
  • Who funds LAKE FOREST OPEN LANDS ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds ELAWA FARM FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds The Chicago Community Trust ↗
  • Who funds SARAH'S CIRCLE ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Clarks Fork FoundationIL15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Clarks Fork Foundation · Butler Family Foundation · John and Kathleen Schreiber Foundation D/B/A Schreiber Philanthropy · The Chicago Community Trust · Hunter Family Foundation · Little Orchard Foundation · Hunting Foundation · Fletcher Family Foundation · Garrett Family Foundation · CMB Foundation · Hedberg Foundation Inc · Red Bird Hollow Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Geraldine & Roland Ford Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Geraldine & Roland Ford Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Geraldine & Roland Ford Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Geraldine & Roland Ford Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Geraldine & Roland Ford’s filings →

    More from the funding graph