· Private foundation
Geraldine and R a Barrows Foundation 10013700
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k4 grants · $20k
- $10k–50k16 grants · $275k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $170k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| HEART OF AMERICA PATRIOT FOUNDATION | $60,000 |
| THE CHILDREN'S PLACE | $60,000 |
| ST MICHAELS VETERANS CENTER | $50,000 |
| LAZARUS MINISTRIES | $40,000 |
| CASS COMMUNITY HEALTH FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
| MARC COMMUNITY SERVICES CORPORATION | $25,000 |
| SHEFFIELD PLACE | $20,000 |
| RESEARCH FOUNDATION | $20,000 |
| KIDS TLC | $15,000 |
| CENTER FOR DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED | $15,000 |
| WOMENS EMPLOYMENT NETWORK | $15,000 |
| MATTIE RHODES CENTER | $15,000 |
| HEART OF AMERICA SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL | $15,000 |
| FRIENDS OF JOHNSON COUNTY DEVELOPMENTAL | $15,000 |
| ELEVATE METRO KC | $15,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $258k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 71% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +32% since the first grant, against +21% for the ones you funded once.
25 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 47% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $245k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- VPVALOR PARTNERS FOUNDATION4× · 2021–2024 · $170k · revenue +89%
- LMLAZARUS MINISTRIES KC3× · 2020–2024 · $65k · revenue +24%
- SPSHEFFIELD PLACE3× · 2021–2024 · $60k · revenue +53%
Funded once
- MSMETROPOLITAN STATE UNIVERSITY OFone grant, 2020 · $186k
- ARAMERICAN ROYAL ASSOCIATION INCone grant, 2020 · $75k · revenue -36%
- CICHES INCone grant, 2023 · $30k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Helping people move to a better life through hope-filled care, services, and advocacy; calling all those of goodwill to join us
Front Porch Alliance works together with residents of Kansas City, Missouris eastside and urban core to meet their changing needs at home and in school.
House of Hope Kansas City is unique, because we work with teens and their parents to find solutions and ultimately, restoration of healthy family relationships. We serve families in crisis with our program for residents to experience the…
Offer hope to build a better tomorrow through mental health services.
Grow food, farms and community in support of a sustainable, healthy and local food system.
Acquire and develop real estate to provide safe, decent, and affordable housing to low-income homeowners while working to ensure a culturally, ethnically, and economically diverse and stable community where generations can thrive in place.
KC Tenants organizes to ensure that everyone in Kansas City has a safe, accessible, and truly affordable home.
Outreach to help animals suffering in the urban core of kansas city.
All of Cornerstone efforts are directed toward interrupting the cycle of homelessness, providing decent, safe, accessible and affordable housing of choice to moderate and low-income households, and revitalizing Topeka neighborhoods.
Leading the way in creating a compassionate, safe community for pets and people through progressive lifesaving programs and services, community resources, and educational opportunities.
Opportunities, inc. of jefferson county provides services for individuals for the purpose of maximizing their success and enhancing their abilities to be independent, contributing members of the community.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mattie Rhodes Memorial Society D/B/a Mattie Rhodes Center and the most unlike its peers is The Peace Partnership Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 23 years old; the field is 21. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
64 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 64 of the 84 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds VALOR PARTNERS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN ROYAL ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds LAZARUS MINISTRIES KC ↗
- Who funds NEWHOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds SHEFFIELD PLACE ↗
- Who funds THE CHILDREN'S PLACE INC ↗
- Who funds AVILA UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds THE COMMIT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ST MICHAEL'S VETERANS CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds THE RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds UNITED INNER CITY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds KANSAS CITY JAZZ ORCHESTRA ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED ↗
- Who funds WOMENS EMPLOYMENT NETWORK ↗
- Who funds THE PHOENIX FAMILY HOUSING CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds ELEVATE METRO KC ↗
- Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF KANSAS CITY ↗
- Who funds CASS COMMUNITY HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CURIOUS THEATRE COMPANY ↗
- Who funds JACKSON COUNTY CASA ↗
- Who funds HILLCREST MINISTRIES OF MIDAMERICA ↗
- Who funds RESTART INC ↗
- Who funds HIGH ASPIRATIONS INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds HEARTLAND MENS CHORUS ↗
- Who funds FRONTIER SCHOOLS INC ↗
- Who funds HOPE HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds GIVING THE BASICS INC ↗
- Who funds HEART OF AMERICA SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL ↗
- Who funds KIDSTLC INC ↗
- Who funds Friends of Jcds Inc ↗
- Who funds MATTIE RHODES MEMORIAL SOCIETY D/B/A MATTIE RHODES CENTER ↗
- Who funds BOYS HOPE GIRLS HOPE ↗
- Who funds THE HOPE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds PATHWAY FINANCIAL EDUCATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Greater Kansas City Community Foundation · Health Forward Foundation · United Way of Greater Kansas City Inc · E Kemper Carter & Anna Curry Carter Community · The Sunderland Foundation · Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation · Oppenstein Brothers Foundation · William T Kemper Foundation Commerce Bank Trustee · The H & R Block Foundation · Kearney Wornall Foundation 10017900 · The Francis Family Foundation · R a Long Foundation 600 Plaza West Bldg
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Geraldine and R a Barrows Foundation 10013700 funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.