· Private foundation
Gerald a Doering Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k3 grants · $6k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
- $250k+1 grant · $333k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| DOMINICAN COLLEGE | $333,333 |
| GREATER NEWBURGH SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA | $10,000 |
| CANTERBURY BROOK ACADEMY | $10,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,000 |
| CORNWALL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE | $1,000 |
| HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF NEWBURGH | $200 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 99% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +26% since the first grant, against -6% for the ones you funded once.
28 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 26 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $16k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- GNGREATER NEWBURGH SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA CORP6× · 2019–2024 · $16k · revenue +83%
- MHMID HUDSON ANIMAL AID INC7× · 2017–2023 · $7k · revenue +26%
- TNTHE NEWBURGH MINISTRY INC7× · 2017–2023 · $7k · revenue +124%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2020 · $25k
- SMST MARY'S CHURCHone grant, 2022 · $7k
- TCThe Children's Cancer Society of America Incone grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue -58%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Housing assistance
None
To provide food items to needy households
Established for the purpose of stimulating planning, economic development, and neighborhood revitalization in the city of newburgh, new york.
To provide the community with a no kill animal shelter where animals are provided with a caring healthy environment until appropriate sustainable homes can be found.
Provide humane care for unwanted or abused animals.
Mission to rescue animals from danger situtation, giving a good care protection and placed for adoption
Historic newburgh, inc. is a non-profit, main street organization dedicated to historic preservation, economic revitalization and sustainability of downtown newburgh.
The organization was formed to safeguard and share existing and future collections related to the social, cultural, and economic history of the high peaks adirondack region in and around the township of newcomb in essex county, new york.
The Museum's mission is to encourage and promote the appreciation of fine art to people in its surrounding communities and beyond. The Museum is dedicated to fostering a deeper understanding of the arts, with particular emphasis on the…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mid Hudson Animal Aid Inc and the most unlike its peers is Play for Your Freedom Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds DOMINICAN UNIVERSITY NEW YORK ↗
- Who funds GREATER NEWBURGH SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA CORP ↗
- Who funds NEWBURGH SCATS INC ↗
- Who funds Pediatric Brain Tumor Foundation of the United States Inc ↗
- Who funds MID HUDSON ANIMAL AID INC ↗
- Who funds THE NEWBURGH MINISTRY INC ↗
- Who funds DUTCHESS COUNTY SPCA INC ↗
- Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS OF GREATER NEWBURGH INC ↗
- Who funds SAN MIGUEL ACADEMY OF NEWBURGH ↗
- Who funds The Children's Cancer Society of America Inc ↗
- Who funds REGIONAL FOOD BANK OF NORTHEASTERN NEW YORK INC ↗
- Who funds BLACC VANILLA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Play For Your Freedom Inc ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF ORANGE AND SULLI ↗
- Who funds SPARK MEDIA PROJECT INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The William and Elaine Kaplan Family Private Foundation · Community Foundation of Orange and Sulli · American Express Foundation · Price Chopper's Golub Foundation · Network for Good · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Gerald a Doering Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Gerald a Doering Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Gerald a Doering Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.