How much did George Pocock Rowing Foundation grant in FY2024?

George Pocock Rowing Foundation reported 14 grants totaling $463,411 in its FY2024 IRS filing.

Where is George Pocock Rowing Foundation based?

George Pocock Rowing Foundation is based in WA.

George Pocock Rowing Foundation

Foundation Dossiers Mostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →

· Public charity

George Pocock Rowing Foundation

Our mission is to help young people access and experience the life-changing sport of rowing.

$463k

Granted FY2024

Grants

Communities

$25k

Largest

01What you fund

0183% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.

Recreation & Sports$609kHealth$358kHuman Services$55kYouth Development$50kEducation$39kPhilanthropy$8kOther$226k

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

bainbridgebir

2019

activitiesgreen lakelake crewbainbridgebir

2020

pandemic recovery

2021

ambtif fundedfunded inclusivity

2022

financial aidyouthwagescoachcolorathletepractice

2023

beautiful thingthing inclusiondallasaward start

2024

coaching transportationsummer campergometerswhatcomskillyouthfitness

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k4 grants · $29k
$10k–50k10 grants · $216k

$23,489

Median grant

States reached

$3.2M

Total assets

Largest grants

Atlantic City High School$25,000
Xavier University Rowing Club$25,000
Pocock Rowing Club$25,000
Newport Rowing Club$25,000
Hope on Water$25,000
DeMatha Catholic High School$25,000
Renton Rowing Center$23,489
Evanston Township HS Rowing$15,000
Duwamish Rowing Club$15,000
Brick City Rowing$12,500
Mount Baker Rowing & Sailing$7,624
Whatcom Rowing$7,521
Tacoma Rowing$7,004
Associated Recreation Council$6,930

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–23, $55k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12% — the area typically sits at 11%. 45% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 8% of George Pocock Rowing Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

George Pocock Rowing Foundationlessmore of its giving

Placed by recipient address · 8.6% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

70%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$943k · 13 repeat orgs$403k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +14% since the first grant, against +4% for the ones you funded once.

13 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$943k

$240k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+14%

+4%

Still filing today

92%

71%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 34% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $163k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Recreation & SportsHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentEducationHealthPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

SG
Susan G Komen Foundation
3× · 2017–2019 · $358k · revenue +34%
BI
Bainbridge Island Rowing Asso
2× · 2018–2019 · $100k · revenue +13%
R
ROWLA
2× · 2022–2023 · $36k · revenue +112%

Funded once

RF
RIVERSPORT FOUNDATION
one grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue +3%
DU
DALLAS UNITED CREW
one grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue +4%
BC
BLJ COMMUNITY ROWING
one grant, 2022 · $24k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Austin Rowing Club

To foster national and international amateur sports competition and to promote health and wellness within the community, provide outdoor recreational opportunities, and foster an appreciation for the natural environment.

Recreation & Sports

Wake Rowing

Our mission is to promote character, commitment, athleticism and teamwork in youth through the sport of competitive rowing.

Recreation & Sports

Eugene Rowing Club

Eugene Rowing Club strives to build a team-oriented program. Our student athletesdevelop personal character, time management skills, an ethic of cooperation, and physical fitness with a team culture of crew and rowing. Athletes learn to…

Recreation & Sports

Sooner Rowing Association

—

Old and Ancient Rowers Society of

Promotes and supports the university of rhode island crew club through fundraising efforts aimed at improving and maintaning the boathouse and promotes the sport of rowing in the local community through provision of rowing classes.

Education

Ann Arbor Rowing Club

To provide opportunities and support for instruction, training, practice and competition in the sport of rowing.

Recreation & Sports

Riverside Boat Club of Cambridge

Rowing competition and instruction for various ages and skill levels

Recreation & Sports

Norcal Crew

Norcal crew is dedicated to training youth in the sport of competitive rowing. the organization has teams for boys and girls from age 12-18. most are from the local area around redwood city california. its activities involve on-the-water…

Recreation & Sports

Lake Washington Rowing Club

The Lake Washington Rowing Club is here to further the sport of rowing, in the greater Seattle area.

Recreation & Sports

Pacific Rowing Club

Youth rowing training and instruction

Recreation & Sports

Olympia Area Rowing Association

To promote, foster, and facilitate the sports of rowing and paddling human-powered watercraft; to preserve the heritage and history of these sports; and to organize and operate a community facility that is devoted to these sports.

Recreation & Sports

Rio Salado Rowing Club Inc

We empower adult rowers to discover the joys of rowing and advance their skills in a welcoming team environment.

Recreation & Sports

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Newport Rowing Club and the most unlike its peers is The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 12 years old; the field is 16. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 21% of your grantees by number, and just 35% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/35

the rest of the field

11%

206,164/1,819,530

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

06the grantee network

27 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

26/27

Grantees still filing

20/27

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Recreation & Sports$609,010Health$358,000Other$226,258Human Services$55,400Youth Development$50,000Education$39,000Philanthropy$7,750

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Paypal Charitable Giving FundDC5.5× affinity7 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation George Pocock Rowing Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

5get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: UNITY BOAT CLUB.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

high risk

~2 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 2 filed years.

Track record & reputation

medium risk

2 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 2.0× since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 922885034 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on UNITY BOAT CLUB, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

FlagFinancial stability— Roughly 2 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 59% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to George Pocock Rowing Foundation?

Find your warmest path to George Pocock Rowing Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

George Pocock Rowing Foundation

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Where the work is directed

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

27 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to George Pocock Rowing Foundation?

More from the funding graph

George Pocock Rowing Foundation

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Where the work is directed

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

27 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to George Pocock Rowing Foundation?

More from the funding graph