Skip to content

· Private foundation

George P White Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$30k
Granted FY2024still arriving
25
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Human Services$73kHealth$17kFood & Nutrition$16kAnimals$14kHousing & Shelter$13kReligion$11kPublic Safety & Disaster$6kYouth Development$2kOther$0
02FY2024 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k24 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$750
Median grant
6
States reached
$93k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HOUSE OF THE GOOD SHEPHERD$10,001
PAWS CHICAGO$2,500
Individual grant recipient$2,500
GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY$1,000
EVARTS CONGREGATIONAL METHODIST$1,000
CHICAGO POLICE MEMORIAL FOUNDATION$1,000
CHICAGO LIGHTHOUSE$1,000
UNITED SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS$1,000
FOURTH PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$1,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$1,000
PACIFIC GARDEN MISSION$1,000
RE-CONNECT CHICAGO$800
OPTIMUM HEALTH INSTITUTE$750
MAKE A WISH$500
SHRINERS HOSPITAL$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $65k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $500 → 9%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $1k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $750 → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $500 → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $500 → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $475 → 14%THE NIGHT MINISTRY: $2k → 14%THE NIGHT MINISTRY: $1k → 14%THE NIGHT MINISTRY: $500 → 14%THE NIGHT MINISTRY: $500 → 14%BLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK: $500 → 14%THE NIGHT MINISTRY: $500 → 14%RE-CONNECT CHICAGO: $800 → 14%RE-CONNECT CHICAGO: $500 → 14%HOUSE OF THE GOOD SHEPHERD: $10k → 14%HOUSE OF THE GOOD SHEPHERD: $10k → 14%HOUSE OF THE GOOD SHEPHERD: $10k → 14%HOUSE OF THE GOOD SHEPHERD: $10k → 14%HOUSE OF THE GOOD SHEPHERD: $10k → 14%CHICAGO LIGHTHOUSE: $2k → 14%CHICAGO LIGHTHOUSE: $1k → 14%CHICAGO LIGHTHOUSE: $1k → 14%CHICAGO LIGHTHOUSE: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
IA
CA
KY
AZ
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$144k · 24 repeat orgs$11k to everyone else

24 repeat relationships: 19 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
10

Total granted

$144k
$8k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
+49%

Still filing today

50%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesAnimalsFood & NutritionPublic BenefitArts & CultureRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PC
    PAWS CHICAGO
    5× · 2020–2024 · $10k · revenue +210%
  • GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY
    5× · 2020–2024 · $8k · revenue +17%
  • CP
    CHICAGO POLICE MEMORIAL FOUNDATION
    4× · 2020–2024 · $5k · revenue +47%

Funded once

  • CC
    CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE
    one grant, 2021 · $2k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $2k
  • TT
    THE THRESHOLDSgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $1k · revenue +25%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Feeding San Diego

On a mission to connect every person facing hunger with nutritious meals by maximizing food rescue. through direct service and community partnerships, feeding san diego provides more than 26 million meals each year to children, families,…

Food & Nutrition
2
Chicago Canine Rescue Foundation

Chicago canine rescue foundation finds permanent homes for homeless dogs in our community with a specific emphasis on assisting the most vulnerable animals, who without our help, would have no other options. while in our care, they are…

Animals
3
University of Chicago Medical Center

Our mission at the university of chicago medicine is to provide superior health care through rigorous research, innovative education, and comprehensive care and healing. in partnership with our colleagues, we pursue life-changing…

Health
4
Puppies Behind Bars Inc

Puppies behind bars trains incarcerated individuals to raise service dogs for wounded war veterans and first responders, facility dogs for police departments, and explosive-detecton canines for law enforcement.

Human Services
5
Northern Illinois Food Bank

With the support of our community, we provide over 90 million meals annually through our network of over 900 member food pantries and programs across thirteen counties, currently reaching over a half million individuals each month with…

Food & Nutrition
6
Michigan Humane Society

To improve and save lives through compassionate care, community engagement and advocacy for animals.

Animals
7
Ageguide Northeastern Illinois Area On Aging

We strive to make aging easier through the development of a network of services for older persons designed to optimize the quality of their lives.

Food & Nutrition
8
Feeding Illinois

Feeding illinois is a coalition of eight feeding america food banks that provide food to over 2,400 food pantries, soup kitchens, and shelters that feed nearly 1.4 million residents across the entire state of illinois.

Food & Nutrition
9
Aerial Recovery

Aerial recovery's mission is to save lives and stop evil. through the creation and deployment of humanitarian special operators, aerial recovery brings together selected veterans, first responders, and mission-qualified civilians who,…

—
10
Covenant House Illinois Inc

In 34 cities across five countries, covenant house builds bridges to hope for young people facing homelessness and survivors of human trafficking. we meet their immediate needs for food, clothing, protection, and medical and mental health…

Human Services
11
Chicago House & Social Service Agency

Provides housing and support services to individuals and families impacted by hiv/aids

Health
12
Central Pennsylvania Food Bank

Our mission is to solve hunger in central pennsylvania by ensuring that everyone struggling with hunger has access to enough wholesome food every day. we will achieve this bold goal with the help of our generous donors, volunteers and…

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Nourishing Hope; the most unlike its peers is Re-Connect Chicago. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
14/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

House of the Good Shepherd: $50,101 · Human ServicesHouse of the Good ShepherdTHE NIGHT MINISTRY: $4,500 · Human ServicesTHE NIGHT MINISTRYTHE CHICAGO LIGHTHOUSE FOR PEOPLE WHO ARE BLIND OR VISUALLY IMPAIRED: $4,500 · Human ServicesTHE CHICAGO LIGHTHOUSE FOR PEOPLE WHO ARE BLIND…WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $2,225 · Human Services+4 more: $3,300 · Human ServicesIndividual grant recipient: $11,251 · OtherIndividual grant recipientGOOD SHEPHERD OF LOS ANGELES: $6,300 · OtherGOOD SHEPHERD OF LOS ANGELESPACIFIC GARDEN MISSION: $5,750 · OtherPACIFIC GARDEN MISSIONOPTIMUM HEALTH INSTITUTE: $5,250 · OtherOPTIMUM HEALTH INSTITUTEFOURTH PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $4,000 · OtherFOURTH PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHEVARTS CONGREGATIONAL METHODIST: $3,750 · OtherEVARTS CONGREGATIONAL METHODISTMAKE A WISH: $3,000 · OtherMISERICORDIA: $2,950 · OtherEVARTS CONGREGATIONATION METHODIST: $2,500 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE: $2,000 · Other+13 more: $10,700 · Other+13 morePAWS CHICAGO: $9,750 · AnimalsPAWS CHIC…The Anti-Cruelty Society: $2,500 · AnimalsThe Anti-…THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $900 · AnimalsTHE AMERI…GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $7,750 · Food & NutritionFeeding America: $500 · Food & NutritionUNITED SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS INC: $4,500 · Public BenefitPAWS FOR PURPLE HEARTS: $1,000 · Public BenefitCHICAGO POLICE MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $5,250 · Arts & CultureJESSE WHITE TUMBLING TEAM INC: $1,000 · Recreation & Sports
Human Services$64,626Other$57,451Animals$13,150Food & Nutrition$8,250Public Benefit$5,500Arts & Culture$5,250Recreation & Sports$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHouse of the Good Shepherd: $50,101 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetPAWS CHICAGO: $9,750 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $7,750 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCHICAGO POLICE MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $5,250 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS INC: $4,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NIGHT MINISTRY: $4,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHICAGO LIGHTHOUSE FOR PEOPLE WHO ARE BLIND OR VISUALLY IMPAIRED: $4,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetThe Anti-Cruelty Society: $2,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $2,225 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE THRESHOLDS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJESSE WHITE TUMBLING TEAM INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPAWS FOR PURPLE HEARTS: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $900 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNOURISHING HOPE: $350 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetIMERMAN ANGELS: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds House of the Good Shepherd ↗
  • Who funds PAWS CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY ↗
  • Who funds CHICAGO POLICE MEMORIAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UNITED SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE NIGHT MINISTRY ↗
  • Who funds THE CHICAGO LIGHTHOUSE FOR PEOPLE WHO ARE BLIND OR VISUALLY IMPAIRED ↗
  • Who funds The Anti-Cruelty Society ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds RE-CONNECT CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds THE THRESHOLDS ↗
  • Who funds JESSE WHITE TUMBLING TEAM INC ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds PAWS FOR PURPLE HEARTS ↗
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
  • Who funds Feeding America ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC ↗
  • Who funds BLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK INC ↗
  • Who funds NOURISHING HOPE ↗
  • Who funds IMERMAN ANGELS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jpmorgan Chase FoundationNY11.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization George P White Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from George P White Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on George P White’s filings →

More from the funding graph