· Private foundation
George F Baker Uw Co Palen Anderson
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 44% of GEORGE F BAKER UW CO PALEN ANDERSON’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k11 grants · $44k
- $10k–50k8 grants · $113k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| IYRS SCHOOL OF TECHNOLOGY | $22,500 |
| SCHOOLYARD FILMS | $20,000 |
| TRIANGLE CLUB | $15,000 |
| SAINT ANDREW'S SCHOOL | $12,500 |
| ST MICHAELS COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL | $12,500 |
| Harry Hamilton Foundation | $10,000 |
| Geisel School of Medicine | $10,000 |
| FERN HOUSE | $10,000 |
| MOVIES MAKE A DIFFERENCE | $5,000 |
| INSTITUTE FOR ETHNOMEDICINE | $5,000 |
| SELFLESS LOVE FDN | $5,000 |
| FRIENDS OF PALM BEACH | $5,000 |
| YMCA OF PALM BEACH | $5,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,000 |
| SURFING FLORIDA MUSEUM | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $102k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 98% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +29% since the first grant, against +3% for the ones you funded once.
23 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- FHFERN HOUSE INC6× · 2019–2024 · $60k · revenue +29%
- SFSCHOOLYARD FILMS INC5× · 2019–2024 · $52k · revenue +154%
- SMST MICHAEL'S COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL5× · 2020–2024 · $45k · revenue +94%
Funded once
- FCFABIEN COUSTEAU OCEAN LEARNING CENTER I NCone grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue -4%
- YOYMCA OF THE TREASURE COASTone grant, 2021 · $15k
- TFTUNISON FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2019 · $15k · revenue -56%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To inspire environmental stewardship of florida's coastal ecosystems through education, research and advocacy.
We harness the power of plants for humankind and share the joy and beauty of tropical gardening with everyone. fairchild tropical botanic garden is a museum of tropical plants within a world famous, 83-acre designed landscape. it was…
The friends of the florida maritime museum, inc. supports the activities of the florida maritime museum, which collects, preserves, and shares traditional knowledge, cultural artifacts and personal stories specific to florida's fishing and…
Over the past fifty years our south florida ocean habitat and reefs have been degraded by a variety of destructive influences including population growth, climate change, pollution, invasive exotic species and lack of education on and…
To advance education, awareness, and scientifically supported solutions to restore and protect marine ecosystems and our way of life for future generations.
Florida state parks foundation preserves, protects, sustains and grows florida state parks.
The mission of Ocean First Institute is ocean conservation through research and education. We work to deepen the natural connection between people and the ocean. We educate and empower people to understand the ocean is our life support…
Our mission is to act to conserve threatened species and ecosystems worldwide, choosing solutions that are sustainable, based on sound science and take into account human needs.
In 2024, biscayne bay waterkeeper (d/b/a miami waterkeeper) built on our reputation by navigating challenges, seizing opportunities, and continuing our unwavering commitment to safeguarding our precious waterways and finding local…
The institutes mission is to cultivate a responsibility for the natural environment and our human communities through interdisciplinary science education.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fishers Island Community Center Inc and the most unlike its peers is Choices for Recovery Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 29 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 27% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 17% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
39 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 39 of the 62 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds FERN HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds SCHOOLYARD FILMS INC ↗
- Who funds ST MICHAEL'S COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds TRIANGLE CLUB INC ↗
- Who funds NEWPORT ART MUSEUM AND ART ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds FABIEN COUSTEAU OCEAN LEARNING CENTER I NC ↗
- Who funds THE INSTITUTE FOR ETHNOMEDICINE INC DBA BRAIN CHEMISTRY LABS ↗
- Who funds THE SURFRIDER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF PALM BEACH INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds TUNISON FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CLEAN OKEECHOBEE WATERS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds BIRCH ROCK CAMP ↗
- Who funds SURFING FLORIDA MUSEUM INC ↗
- Who funds Trustees of Dartmouth College ↗
- Who funds SALISBURY SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds THE WOLF SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds SELFLESS LOVE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds AQUIDNECK ISLAND LAND TRUST ↗
- Who funds RED SNEAKERS FOR OAKLEY INC ↗
- Who funds 1000 FRIENDS OF FLORIDA INC ↗
- Who funds FLORIDA SURF MUSEUM INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF JONATHAN DICKINSON ST PRK INC ↗
- Who funds CHOICES FOR RECOVERY INC ↗
- Who funds LIGHTHAWK ↗
- Who funds FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds HABITS OF WASTE ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF MACARTHUR BEACH STATE PARK INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Community Foundation for Palm Beach and Martin Counties Inc · Lost Tree Village Charitable Foundation · Michael Kluger & Heidi Greene Foundation · The William H Pitt Foundation Inc · The de Ramel Foundation · The Batchelor Foundation Inc · United Way of Palm Beach County Inc · The New York Community Trust · The Bessemer Giving Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization George F Baker Uw Co Palen Anderson funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Tunison Foundation Inc — 74% of income from government
- Angari Foundation Inc — 2% of income from government
- Children's Golf Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
- New Hope Charities Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.