Skip to content

· Private foundation

Geoffrey C and Kelly K Gage Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$160k
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$152k
Largest
01What it funds
0189% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Philanthropy$160kEducation$29kReligion$12kCrime & Legal$10kHuman Services$5kInternational$4kRecreation & Sports$3kArts & Culture$252Other$0
02FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $152k
$151,853
Median grant
1
States reached
$194k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Chicago Community Foundation$151,853
Chicago Community Foundation$8,170
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–20, $9k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CONGRESSIONAL COALITION ON ADOPTION INSTITUTE: $2k → 14%CONGRESSIONAL COALITION ON ADOPTION INSTITUTE: $2k → 14%WORLD CHILDHOOD FOUNDATION: $1k → 17%WORLD CHILDHOOD FOUNDATION: $1k → 17%CONGRESSIONAL COALITION ON ADOPTION INSTITUTE: $2k → 14%WORLD CHILDHOOD FOUNDATION: $1k → 17%WORLD CHILDHOOD FOUNDATION: $1k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

25%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$59k · 12 repeat orgs$175k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +50% since the first grant, against +14% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
5

Total granted

$59k
$15k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+50%
+14%

Still filing today

75%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $160k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’24
EducationHuman ServicesCrime & LegalRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NN
    NOMI NETWORK INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $10k · revenue +268%
  • UO
    University of St Thomas
    4× · 2017–2020 · $7k · revenue +49%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION
    3× · 2017–2019 · $5k · revenue +105%

Funded once

  • SB
    ST BARTHOLOMEW CATHOLIC CHURCH
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
  • BS
    BENILDE ST MARGARETS HIGH SCHOOL
    one grant, 2021 · $4k
  • Northwestern University
    one grant, 2021 · $3k · revenue +14%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
2
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
3
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
4
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
5
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
6
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
7
National Association of College and University Attorneys

To advance the practice of higher education attorneys for the benefit of the institutions they serve.

—
8
The George Washington University

The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…

Education
9
Manhattan University

Manhattan university is an independent catholic instituion of higher learning that embraces qualified men and women of all faiths, cultures, and traditions. the mission of manhattan university is to provide a contemporary, person-centered…

Education
10
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
11
Fielding Graduate University

We provide exemplary interdisciplinary programs for a community of scholar-practitioners within a distributed learning model grounded in student-driven inquiry and leading to enhanced knowledge.

—
12
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Minnesota Foundation; the most unlike its peers is International Foundation for Art Research Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
10/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHICAGO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $160,023 · OtherCHICAGO COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient: $8,001 · Other+6 more: $19,920 · Other+6 moreUniversity of St Thomas: $6,877 · EducationUniversity …UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION: $5,001 · EducationUNIVERSITY …GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $5,001 · EducationGEORGETOWN …MARIST UNIVERSITY: $5,001 · EducationMARIST UNIV…PROVIDENCE ACADEMY: $1,667 · EducationPROVIDENCE …MINNEHAHA ACADEMY: $1,001 · EducationNOMI NETWORK INC: $9,702 · Crime & LegalCONGRESSIONAL COALITION ON ADOPTION INSTITUTE: $5,001 · Human ServicesWORLD CHILDHOOD FOUNDATION INC: $4,000 · Human ServicesNorthwestern University: $2,500 · Recreation & Sports
Other$187,944Education$24,548Crime & Legal$9,702Human Services$9,001Recreation & Sports$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNOMI NETWORK INC: $9,702 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetUniversity of St Thomas: $6,877 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION: $5,001 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $5,001 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMARIST UNIVERSITY: $5,001 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCONGRESSIONAL COALITION ON ADOPTION INSTITUTE: $5,001 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetWORLD CHILDHOOD FOUNDATION INC: $4,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetNorthwestern University: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPROVIDENCE ACADEMY: $1,667 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMINNEHAHA ACADEMY: $1,001 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR ART RESEARCH INC: $252 over 3y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NOMI NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds University of St Thomas ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds MARIST UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds CONGRESSIONAL COALITION ON ADOPTION INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CHILDHOOD FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Northwestern University ↗
  • Who funds PROVIDENCE ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds MINNEHAHA ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR ART RESEARCH INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way WorldwideVA12.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way Worldwide · National Philanthropic Trust · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Geoffrey C and Kelly K Gage Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Geoffrey C and Kelly K Gage Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Geoffrey C and Kelly K Gage Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Geoffrey C and Kelly K Gage Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record but names no grant recipient in the published copy, so the figures above are from FY2024, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Geoffrey C and Kelly K Gage Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph