Skip to content

· Public charity

GenYOUTH Incorporated

Genyouth, incorporated was incorporated on may 8, 2009, in the district of columbia under the non-profit corporation act.

$3.2M
Granted FY2024still arriving
42
Grants FY2024still arriving
16
States reached
$81k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Education$9.5MFood & Nutrition$5.1MRecreation & Sports$455kHealth$318kYouth Development$274kPublic Safety & Disaster$154kHuman Services$41kEnvironment$6kOther$0
02FY2024 · 42 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 42 grants below total $595,604, the rows itemized in this filing. The $3,234,379 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $2,638,775 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k26 grants · $134k
  • $10k–50k14 grants · $325k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $137k
$6,000
Median grant
16
States reached
$12M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SOUTHWEST ISD$81,400
AURORA PUB SCH NUTRITION SVC$55,230
EAST CENTRAL IND SCH DIST$41,450
DENVER PUB SCH ENTERPRISE MGMT$40,000
TUCSON UNIFIED SCH DISTRICT$36,000
SAN BENITO CONS IND SCH DIST$31,858
PITTSBURGH PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICT-FOOD SERVICE FUND$25,000
UPLIFE EDUCATION$24,671
NEW BRAUNFELS INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT$21,693
HAYS CONSOLIDATED INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT$19,535
MESQUITE INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT$18,500
FERGUSON FLORISSANT SCHOOL DISTRICT$16,000
BALTIMORE CITY PUBLIC SCHOOLS$15,000
RIO GRANDE CITY GRULLA INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT$15,000
CARROLL COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–22, $160k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 94% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Family and Community Trust: $10k → 10%PARA LOS NINOS: $150k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
ME
VT
NH
WA
ID
MT
ND
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

45%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$7.2M · 162 repeat orgs$8.7M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +36% since the first grant, against +33% for those funded once.

162 repeat relationships: 25 still active in FY2024, 137 since wound down; 17 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

162
680

Total granted

$7.2M
$8.6M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%
+33%

Still filing today

4%
6%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $114k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationPhilanthropyHuman ServicesArts & CultureFood & NutritionRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IP
    IDEA Public Schools
    3× · 2020–2022 · $56k · revenue +78%
  • UE
    UPLIFT EDUCATION
    2× · 2021–2024 · $31k · revenue +29%
  • KS
    KIPP ST LOUIS
    3× · 2018–2020 · $29k · revenue +79%

Funded once

  • PL
    PARA LOS NINOS
    one grant, 2022 · $150k · revenue +13%
  • EG
    ELK GROVE UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
    2× · 2019–2020 · $88k
  • TB
    THE BOSTON EDUCATIONAL DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2022 · $75k · revenue -30%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sonoma Charter School

Sonoma charter school seeks to achieve academic excellence through engaged learning in a setting that involves students, teachers, and parents.

Education
2
The New American Academy Charter School

The new american academy charter school empowers learners and inspires leaders to make this a better world. through our collaborative teacher teams, mastery-based career ladder, and looping cycles, we offer personalized rigorous…

Education
3
Elite Public Schools

To ensure students reach their fullest potential through access to learning spaces that honor and celebrate students' rich cultural heritage and challenge them with rigorous and relevant learning experiences designed to make them active…

Education
4
Vista Charter Public Schools Inc

At vista, students master core subjects through the power of applying knowledge in a real-world context. in addition to rigorous academics, our schools focus on increased proficiency in crucial areas such as critical thinking, problem…

Education
5
Twin Peaks Charter Academy

The organization provides students with a rigorous education and the foundations of virtue and character, while building cultural literacy through a content-rich curriculum in an encouraging environment.

Education
6
The Peak School

The peak school seeks to ignite a passion for learning, to develop students of diverse talents and backgrounds who think critically and act with integrity, and to graduate compassionate, confident, capable students who will embrace their…

Education
7
Mastery Charter High School

All students learn the academic and personal skills they need to be truly prepared for postsecondary success and able to pursue their dreams.

Education
8
Bronx Charter School for Excellence

Excellence community schools prepares young people in new york city and stamford to compete for admission to and succeed in top public, private and parochial high schools by cultivating their intellectual, artistic, social, emotional, and…

Education
9
Carbon Valley Academy

To provide rich content and solid skills instruction in an environment that champions character and personal academic achievement. carbon valley provides a public eduction to students preschool through grade 8.

Education
10
Prairie Crossing Charter School

We believe that children are our best hope to improve the world.

Education
11
The Language Academy of Sacramento

The las mission is to create a learning community where students: utilize bilingualism and biliteracy (spanish and english) to achieve academic excellence and apply skills in real-world situations and diverse settings; develop and exhibit…

Education
12
Darnall Charter School

We are committed to academic excellence by vigorously engaging students in a rigorous, student-centered learning environment that will foster the development of global citizens.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Education for Change; the most unlike its peers is Tennessee Titans Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

86 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 86 of the 859 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
83/86
Grantees still filing
61/86
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT: $428,000 · OtherSCHOOL DISTRICT OF HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY: $304,420 · Other+189 more: $8,297,398 · Other+189 moreIDEA Public Schools: $56,000 · EducationGreen Dot Public Schools: $48,000 · EducationUPLIFT EDUCATION: $30,671 · EducationTHE LEARNING CHOICE ACADEMY: $30,000 · EducationKipp Metro Atlanta Collaborative Inc: $26,000 · EducationCHICAGO CHARTER SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $24,000 · EducationGREATER LOS ANGELES EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $20,000 · EducationPARA LOS NINOS: $150,000 · Human ServicesUNITEDHEALTHCARE CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $20,000 · Human Services
Other$9,029,818Education$234,671Human Services$170,000

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPARA LOS NINOS: $150,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE BOSTON EDUCATIONAL DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION INC: $75,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetIDEA Public Schools: $56,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGreen Dot Public Schools: $48,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCAPISTRANO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT SCHOOL FACILITIES CORPORATION: $37,500 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetUPLIFT EDUCATION: $30,671 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LEARNING CHOICE ACADEMY: $30,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetKIPP ST LOUIS: $28,750 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetKipp Metro Atlanta Collaborative Inc: $26,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetACERO CHARTER SCHOOLS INC: $26,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHICAGO CHARTER SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $24,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITEDHEALTHCARE CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetGREATER LOS ANGELES EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PARA LOS NINOS ↗
  • Who funds THE BOSTON EDUCATIONAL DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds IDEA Public Schools ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Round It Up America IncCA155.3× affinity176 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Round It Up America Inc · Project Lead the Way Inc · Project Lead the Way Inc · The George W Bush Foundation · Share Our Strength · The Mr Holland's Opus Foundation · Action for Healthy Kids · For Inspiration and Recognition of Science and Technology (FIRST) · Digital Promise Global · I Car Education Foundation · Save the Music Foundation · Justin J Watt Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization GenYOUTH Incorporated funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from GenYOUTH Incorporated. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 859 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on GenYOUTH’s filings →

    More from the funding graph