Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Genie Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$505k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$239k
Largest
01What you fund
0191% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192024.

International$810kPhilanthropy$750kHuman Services$360kCivil Rights$160kHousing & Shelter$110kHealth$100kFood & Nutrition$90kReligion$20kOther$0
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $70k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $435k
$70,581
Median grant
5
States reached
$9.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BRIDGE TURKLYE FUND$239,280
Individual grant recipient$75,000
Individual grant recipient$70,581
DOORWAYS$50,000
GIVE DIRECTLY CLIMATE SURVIVAL FUND$40,000
AFAC ARLINGTON FOOD ASSISTANCE CENTER$30,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–20, $35k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%COMPASS HOUSE: $15k → 13%SHARED HOPE INTERNATIONAL: $10k → 9%COMPASS HOUSE: $10k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
NY
CT
CA
VA
DE
NC
SC
DC

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.3M · 15 repeat orgs$325k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +49% since the first grant, against -7% for the ones you funded once.

15 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
5

Total granted

$2.3M
$245k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+49%
-7%

Still filing today

67%
80%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $80k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesInternationalHealthCivil RightsCommunity ImprovementFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    3× · 2019–2021 · $210k · revenue +79%
  • AMERICARES FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $200k · revenue +28%
  • AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2019–2021 · $110k · revenue +49%

Funded once

  • GLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2021 · $200k · revenue -7%
  • BC
    BUTUN COCUKLAR BIZIM DERNEGI
    one grant, 2023 · $20k
  • SH
    SHARED HOPE INTERNATIONAL
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue -14%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
2
Direct Action for Women Now World-Wide Inc Formerly Indias Daughters Inc
Philanthropy
3
Fajr Scientific

To provide multi-specialty surgical care, humanitarian aid and educational support to people in low- and middle-income countries.

Science & Tech
4
Pathfinder International

Pathfinder expands access to sexual and reproductive health services, opening the door to opportunities for women and all individuals to thrive-economically, educationally, and civically. driven by our country-led leadership and local…

International
5
American Flood Coalition Inc

To drive transformational adaptation to protect communities across the country from higher seas, stronger storms, and more frequent flooding.

Environment
6
Accion International

Our mission is to create a fair and inclusive economy where underserved people have quality financial choices and opportunities to improve their economic well-being. we find and help build innovative companies with the potential to reach…

International
7
Arizona Family Health Partnership

To make sexual and reproductive healthcare accessible to everyone

8
Alight

Alight builds a meaningful life for and with the displaced. not simply addressing basic needs, but building a life filled with joy, dignity, connection, and purpose. we walk with them along their entire journey of displacement and deliver…

International
9
MRIGlobal

To improve the lives of people through innovative scientific and engineering research.

Science & Tech
10
District Alliance for Safe Housing Inc

District alliance for safe housing, inc. (dash) is an innovator in providing access to safe housing and services to survivors of domestic and sexual violence and their families as they rebuild their lives on their own terms.

Housing & Shelter
11
Devworks International

Devworks international is dedicated to a society where all people enjoy the freedom to pursue their own sustainable development. we contribute to this by strengthening the capacity of local organizations.

Human Services
12
She Is Safe Inc

She Is Safe prevents, rescues and restores women and girls from abuse and exploitation in high risk communities across the globe, equipping them to build lives of freedom and faith for a strong future. We accomplish our work in partnership…

International

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Doorways for Women and Families Inc and the most unlike its peers is Shared Hope International. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
9/14
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

BRIDGE TURKLYE FUND — $749,656 · OtherBRIDGE TURKLYE FUNDIndividual grant recipient — $137,406 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient — $125,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientPOPULATIONS SERVICES INTL — $100,000 · OtherPOPULATIONS SERVICES INTLDOORWAYS FOR WOMEN AND FAMILIES INC — $60,000 · OtherDOORWAYS — $50,000 · OtherCAST COALITION TO ABOLISH SLAVERYTRAFFICKING — $50,000 · Other+2 more — $50,000 · OtherMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $210,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA …GLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC — $200,000 · InternationalGLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INCAMERICARES FOUNDATION INC — $200,000 · InternationalAMERICARES FOUNDATION INCPOLARIS PROJECT — $90,000 · InternationalPOLARIS PROJECTGIVEDIRECTLY INC — $240,000 · Human ServicesGIVEDIRECTLY…COMPASS HOUSE — $25,000 · Human ServicesCOMPASS HOUS…SHARED HOPE INTERNATIONAL — $10,000 · Human ServicesSAFE HARBOR INC — $10,000 · Human ServicesAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC — $110,000 · Civil RightsThe Fistula Foundation — $100,000 · HealthPathForward Inc — $85,000 · Community ImprovementArlington Food Assistance Center — $60,000 · Food & NutritionFirst Look Institute Inc — $5,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$1,322,062International$700,000Human Services$285,000Civil Rights$110,000Health$100,000Community Improvement$85,000Food & Nutrition$60,000Arts & Culture$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetGIVEDIRECTLY INC — $240,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $210,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC — $200,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICARES FOUNDATION INC — $200,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC — $110,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe Fistula Foundation — $100,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetPOLARIS PROJECT — $90,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetPathForward Inc — $85,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetDOORWAYS FOR WOMEN AND FAMILIES INC — $60,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetArlington Food Assistance Center — $60,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetCOMPASS HOUSE — $25,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetSHARED HOPE INTERNATIONAL — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSAFE HARBOR INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFirst Look Institute Inc — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GIVEDIRECTLY INC
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
  • Who funds GLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds AMERICARES FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds The Fistula Foundation
  • Who funds POLARIS PROJECT
  • Who funds PathForward Inc
  • Who funds DOORWAYS FOR WOMEN AND FAMILIES INC
  • Who funds Arlington Food Assistance Center
  • Who funds COMPASS HOUSE
  • Who funds SHARED HOPE INTERNATIONAL
  • Who funds SAFE HARBOR INC
  • Who funds First Look Institute Inc

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jpmorgan Chase FoundationNY11.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Network for Good · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Genie Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Americares Foundation Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph