Skip to content
General Raymond G Davis Templar Foundation Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

General Raymond G Davis Templar Foundation Inc

To operate for the benefit and support of humanitarian objectives of grand priory of the united states of america of the sovereign military order of the temple of jerusalem.

$518k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$109k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

International$1.9MEducation$644kReligion$447kPublic Benefit$21kHuman Services$20kCivil Rights$15k
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 5 grants below total $290,825, the rows itemized in this filing. The $518,375 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $227,550 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $56k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $235k
$62,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$2.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF EPISCOPAL$109,300
LASALLE INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION$63,400
BETHLEHEM UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$62,000
FRANCISCAN FOUNDATION OF THE HOLY$41,125
FDN OF RELIEF & RECONCILIATIN$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $783k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF EPISCOPAL DIOCESE OF JERUSALEM: $111k → 9%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF EPISCOPAL: $109k → 9%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF EPISCOPAL DIOCESE OF JERUSALEM: $95k → 9%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF EPISCOPAL DIOCESE OF JERUSALEM: $94k → 9%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF EPISCOPAL DIOCESE OF JERUSALEM: $89k → 9%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF EPISCOPAL DIOCESE OF JERUSALEM: $81k → 9%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF EPISCOPAL DIOCESE OF JERUSALEM: $79k → 9%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF EPISCOPAL DIOCESE OF JERUSALEM: $74k → 9%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF EPISCOPAL DIOCESE OF JERUSALEM: $51k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
NY
MA
CT
CA
VA
MD
TN
DC

Grants abroad, by region: $205k on the FY2025 return

Schedule F, as filed: 1 region. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Region not stated$205k · 100% · 8 grants

Stated purpose: CHARITABLE

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.0M · 10 repeat orgs$56k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
2

Total granted

$3.0M
$56k

Still filing today

60%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $56k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalHuman ServicesPhilanthropyReligionPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE EPISCOPAL DIOCESE OF JERUSALEM INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $783k · revenue +306%
  • LS
    LA SALLE INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $495k · revenue +90%
  • FF
    FRANCISCAN FOUNDATION FOR THE HOLY LAND
    8× · 2017–2024 · $455k · revenue +28%

Funded once

  • FF
    FRANCISCAN FOUNDATION OF THE HOLY
    one grant, 2025 · $41k
  • FO
    FDN OF RELIEF & RECONCILIATIN
    one grant, 2025 · $15k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/6
Grantees still filing
4/6
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BETHLEHEM UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $538,000 · OtherBETHLEHEM UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INCSYNOD OF BISHOPS OF THE RUSSIAN CHURCH OUTSIDE OF RUSSIA: $394,300 · OtherSYNOD OF BISHOPS OF THE RUSSIAN CHURCH OU…ST MARY ARMENIAN APOSTOLIC CHURCH: $105,800 · OtherST MARY ARMENIAN APOSTOLIC CHURCHFRANCISCAN FOUNDATION OF THE HOLY: $41,125 · Other+2 more: $35,000 · OtherAMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE EPISCOPAL DIOCESE OF JERUSALEM INC: $783,400 · Human ServicesAMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE EPISC…FRANCISCAN FOUNDATION FOR THE HOLY LAND: $455,194 · InternationalFRANCISCAN FOUNDATIO…AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR RELIEF AND RECONCILIATION IN THE MIDDLE EAST: $95,000 · InternationalAMERICAN FOUNDATION …LA SALLE INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION INC: $495,420 · PhilanthropyLA SALLE INTERNATI…IRAQI CHRISTIAN RELIEF COUNCIL: $80,850 · ReligionGENERAL RAYMOND G DAVIS TEMPLAR FOUNDATION INC: $32,245 · Public Benefit
Other$1,114,225Human Services$783,400International$550,194Philanthropy$495,420Religion$80,850Public Benefit$32,245

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE EPISCOPAL DIOCESE OF JERUSALEM INC: $783,400 over 9y, 4.3% of budgetLA SALLE INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION INC: $495,420 over 8y, 18% of budgetFRANCISCAN FOUNDATION FOR THE HOLY LAND: $455,194 over 8y, 2.6% of budgetAMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR RELIEF AND RECONCILIATION IN THE MIDDLE EAST: $95,000 over 6y, 11% of budgetIRAQI CHRISTIAN RELIEF COUNCIL: $80,850 over 7y, 7.0% of budgetGENERAL RAYMOND G DAVIS TEMPLAR FOUNDATION INC: $32,245 over 4y, 3.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE EPISCOPAL DIOCESE OF JERUSALEM INC ↗
  • Who funds LA SALLE INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FRANCISCAN FOUNDATION FOR THE HOLY LAND ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR RELIEF AND RECONCILIATION IN THE MIDDLE EAST ↗
  • Who funds IRAQI CHRISTIAN RELIEF COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds GENERAL RAYMOND G DAVIS TEMPLAR FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Network for GoodVanguard Charitable E…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Donor Advised Charita…Amazonsmile Foundation
Network for GoodDC8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Network for Good · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization General Raymond G Davis Templar Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from General Raymond G Davis Templar Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to General Raymond G Davis Templar Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to General Raymond G Davis Templar Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on General Raymond G Davis Templar’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home