Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

General Raymond G Davis Templar Foundation Inc

To operate for the benefit and support of humanitarian objectives of grand priory of the united states of america of the sovereign military order of the temple of jerusalem.

$518k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$109k
Largest
01What you fund
0164% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20172025.

Human Services$783kInternational$550kPhilanthropy$495kReligion$81kPublic Benefit$32kOther$1.1M
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 5 grants below total $290,825 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $518,375 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $227,550 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $56k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $235k
$62,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$2.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF EPISCOPAL$109,300
LASALLE INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION$63,400
BETHLEHEM UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$62,000
FRANCISCAN FOUNDATION OF THE HOLY$41,125
FDN OF RELIEF & RECONCILIATIN$15,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $783k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF EPISCOPAL DIOCESE OF JERUSALEM: $111k → 9%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF EPISCOPAL: $109k → 9%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF EPISCOPAL DIOCESE OF JERUSALEM: $95k → 9%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF EPISCOPAL DIOCESE OF JERUSALEM: $94k → 9%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF EPISCOPAL DIOCESE OF JERUSALEM: $89k → 9%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF EPISCOPAL DIOCESE OF JERUSALEM: $81k → 9%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF EPISCOPAL DIOCESE OF JERUSALEM: $79k → 9%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF EPISCOPAL DIOCESE OF JERUSALEM: $74k → 9%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF EPISCOPAL DIOCESE OF JERUSALEM: $51k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
MI
NY
MA
CT
CA
VA
MD
TN
DC

Grants abroad, by region — $205k on the FY2025 return

Schedule F, as filed: 1 region. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Region not stated$205k · 100% · 8 grants

Stated purpose: CHARITABLE

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.0M · 10 repeat orgs$56k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
2

Total granted

$3.0M
$56k

Still filing today

60%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $56k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalHuman ServicesPhilanthropyReligionPublic BenefitOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE EPISCOPAL DIOCESE OF JERUSALEM INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $783k · revenue +306%
  • LS
    LA SALLE INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $495k · revenue +90%
  • FF
    FRANCISCAN FOUNDATION FOR THE HOLY LAND
    8× · 2017–2024 · $455k · revenue +28%

Funded once

  • FF
    FRANCISCAN FOUNDATION OF THE HOLY
    one grant, 2025 · $41k
  • FO
    FDN OF RELIEF & RECONCILIATIN
    one grant, 2025 · $15k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field
04the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/6
Grantees still filing
4/6
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

BETHLEHEM UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC — $538,000 · OtherBETHLEHEM UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INCSYNOD OF BISHOPS OF THE RUSSIAN CHURCH OUTSIDE OF RUSSIA — $394,300 · OtherSYNOD OF BISHOPS OF THE RUSSIAN CHURCH OU…ST MARY ARMENIAN APOSTOLIC CHURCH — $105,800 · OtherST MARY ARMENIAN APOSTOLIC CHURCHFRANCISCAN FOUNDATION OF THE HOLY — $41,125 · Other+2 more — $35,000 · OtherAMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE EPISCOPAL DIOCESE OF JERUSALEM INC — $783,400 · Human ServicesAMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE EPISC…FRANCISCAN FOUNDATION FOR THE HOLY LAND — $455,194 · InternationalFRANCISCAN FOUNDATIO…AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR RELIEF AND RECONCILIATION IN THE MIDDLE EAST — $95,000 · InternationalAMERICAN FOUNDATION …LA SALLE INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION INC — $495,420 · PhilanthropyLA SALLE INTERNATI…IRAQI CHRISTIAN RELIEF COUNCIL — $80,850 · ReligionGENERAL RAYMOND G DAVIS TEMPLAR FOUNDATION INC — $32,245 · Public Benefit
Other$1,114,225Human Services$783,400International$550,194Philanthropy$495,420Religion$80,850Public Benefit$32,245

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE EPISCOPAL DIOCESE OF JERUSALEM INC — $783,400 over 9y, 4.3% of budgetLA SALLE INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION INC — $495,420 over 8y, 18% of budgetFRANCISCAN FOUNDATION FOR THE HOLY LAND — $455,194 over 8y, 2.6% of budgetAMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR RELIEF AND RECONCILIATION IN THE MIDDLE EAST — $95,000 over 6y, 11% of budgetIRAQI CHRISTIAN RELIEF COUNCIL — $80,850 over 7y, 7.0% of budgetGENERAL RAYMOND G DAVIS TEMPLAR FOUNDATION INC — $32,245 over 4y, 3.5% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE EPISCOPAL DIOCESE OF JERUSALEM INC
  • Who funds LA SALLE INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds FRANCISCAN FOUNDATION FOR THE HOLY LAND
  • Who funds AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR RELIEF AND RECONCILIATION IN THE MIDDLE EAST
  • Who funds IRAQI CHRISTIAN RELIEF COUNCIL
  • Who funds GENERAL RAYMOND G DAVIS TEMPLAR FOUNDATION INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Network for GoodDC8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Network for Good · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization General Raymond G Davis Templar Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to General Raymond G Davis Templar Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to General Raymond G Davis Templar Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph