· Private foundation
General Mills Foundation
Its FY2021 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Read this first · the figures below need context
89% of General Mills Foundation’s FY2021 grant dollars went to Charities Aid Foundation America, not to grantees.
Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2021 names 55 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2021
- Under $10k1 grant · $33
- $10k–50k39 grants · $1.0M
- $50k–250k22 grants · $1.8M
- $250k+4 grants · $26M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Charities Aid Foundation America | $25,023,040 |
| Partners in Food Solutions | $550,000 |
| The Blackbaud Giving Fund | $321,272 |
| Second Harvest Heartland | $250,000 |
| The Blackbaud Giving Fund | $246,803 |
| United Negro College Fund Inc | $225,000 |
| Greater Twin Cities United Way | $100,000 |
| Northside Achievement Zone | $100,000 |
| University of Minnesota Foundation | $95,000 |
| The Food Group Minnesota Inc | $95,000 |
| Way to Grow | $90,000 |
| Pillsbury United Communities | $75,000 |
| Minnesota Historical Society | $75,000 |
| Big Brothers Big Sisters of Greater Twin Cities | $60,000 |
| Community Emergency Assistance Programs Inc | $55,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–21, $283k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The minnesota business partnership's mission is to maintain a high quality of life for all minnesotans by ensuring that the state's economy remains strong, globally competitive and its prospects for growth bright by working with elected…
MCF is a vibrant philanthropic community connecting, strengthening and mobilizing the power of philanthropy to advance prosperity and equity.
The minnesota chamber of commerce proactively leads the business community statewide to: advance pro-business, responsible minnesota public policy that creates jobs and grows the econony; provde member services to address evolving business…
To be the leading voice of medicine to make minnesota the healthiest state and the best place to practice.
Creating powerful advocacy to enhance economic vitality in the minneapolis-st. paul region.
Grow businesses, build wealth and increase reinvestement in the african communities of minnesota
Mn community measurement empowers stakeholders with meaningful information to drive improvement.
United way of northeastern minnesota invests in nonprofits, programs, and collaborations that equip and empower, creating opportunities for people to thrive in our communities.
The Minnesota Council of Nonprofits informs, promotes, connects and strengthens individual nonprofits and the nonprofit sector.
Move minnesota leads the movement for an equitable and sustainable transportation system that puts people first. we are passionate about connecting communities, ending the climate crisis, expanding access to jobs and resources, and…
Driven by an unwavering moral imperative that every child, regardless of its race, income or zip code, deserves the same high-quality education, mn comeback has become a growing movement of philanthropists, community leaders and education…
End hunger together.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Minneapolis Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Perspectives Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 35 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
56 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 56 of the 63 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA ↗
- Who funds THE BLACKBAUD GIVING FUND ↗
- Who funds PARTNERS IN FOOD SOLUTIONS ↗
- Who funds SECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND ↗
- Who funds UNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC ↗
- Who funds NORTHSIDE ACHIEVEMENT ZONE ↗
- Who funds GREATER TWIN CITIES UNITED WAY ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FOOD GROUP MINNESOTA INC THE ↗
- Who funds WAY TO GROW ↗
- Who funds MINNESOTA HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds PILLSBURY UNITED COMMUNITIES ↗
- Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF THE GREATER TWIN CITIES ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS INC ↗
- Who funds Twin Cities Rise ↗
- Who funds COMMUNIDADES LATINAS UNIDAS EN SERVICO INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF THE TWIN CITIES ↗
- Who funds GREATER MINNEAPOLIS COUNCIL OF CHURCHES ↗
- Who funds Washburn Center for Children ↗
- Who funds URBAN VENTURES LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Youthprise ↗
- Who funds GREAT MN SCHOOLS ↗
- Who funds ACHIEVE TWIN CITIES ↗
- Who funds HUNGER IMPACT PARTNERS ↗
- Who funds THE BRANDLAB ↗
- Who funds Youth Farm and Market Project ↗
- Who funds CAPI USA ↗
- Who funds BESTPREP ↗
- Who funds Ed Allies ↗
- Who funds METRO MEALS ON WHEELS INC ↗
- Who funds MILL CITY FARMERS MARKET CHARITABLE FUND ↗
- Who funds INTERFAITH OUTREACH AND COMMUNITY PARTNERS ↗
- Who funds DIVISION OF INDIAN WORK ↗
- Who funds HIAWATHA ACADEMIES ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · The Minneapolis Foundation · Otto Bremer Trust · The Richard M Schulze Family Foundation · Greater Twin Cities United Way · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Cargill Foundation · Mortenson Family Foundation · Land O'Lakes Foundation · Ch Robinson Worldwide Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation · Target Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization General Mills Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to General Mills Foundation?
Find your warmest path to General Mills Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.