Skip to content

· Private foundation

Gene & Marlene Epstein Humanitarian Fund

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$640k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$237k
Largest
01What it funds
0186% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Housing & Shelter$742kFood & Nutrition$385kCommunity Improvement$326kPhilanthropy$176kInternational$168kEducation$84kHuman Services$80kRecreation & Sports$51kOther$0
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $3k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $30k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $607k
$20,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PHILABUNDANCE$237,000
PROJECT HOME$200,000
BUCKS COUNTY OPPORTUNITY COUNCIL$170,000
JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PHILA$20,000
MAZON$10,000
NEWTOWN ROTARY CLUB$2,500
BUCKS COUNTY SPCA$500
BUCKS COUNTY BLUES SOCIETY$482
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $994k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 60% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%BUCKS COUNTY OPPORTUNITY COUNCIL: $170k → 6%AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF CAREGIVING: $5k → 11%BUCKS COUNTY OPPORTUNITY COUNCIL: $67k → 6%BUCKS COUNTY OPPORTUNITY COUNCIL: $50k → 6%BUCKS COUNTY OPPORTUNITY COUNCIL: $39k → 6%JEWISH RELIEF AGENCY: $25k → 7%PROJECT HOME: $200k → 22%PROJECT HOME: $174k → 22%JEWISH RELIEF AGENCY: $5k → 7%PROJECT HOME: $100k → 22%PROJECT HOME: $95k → 22%BETWEEN FRIENDS OUTREACH: $8k → 6%PROJECT HOME: $20k → 22%BETWEEN FRIENDS OUTREACH: $5k → 6%SALUTE 2 SERVICE: $500 → 6%PEACE CENTER: $10k → 6%PEACE CENTER: $8k → 6%THE PEACE CENTER: $6k → 6%PEACE CENTER: $6k → 6%THE PEACE CENTER: $140 → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
PA
NJ
CT
CA
KS
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.8M · 17 repeat orgs$342k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +45% since the first grant, against +25% for those funded once.

17 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
32

Total granted

$1.8M
$342k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+45%
+25%

Still filing today

65%
41%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesPhilanthropyFood & NutritionArts & CultureInternationalCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PH
    PROJECT HOME
    6× · 2018–2024 · $725k · revenue +12%
  • BC
    BUCKS COUNTY OPPORTUNITY COUNCIL INC
    4× · 2020–2024 · $326k · revenue +68%
  • Philabundance
    4× · 2017–2024 · $262k · revenue +101%

Funded once

  • BF
    BCCC FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $100k
  • LB
    LEVITTOWN BRISTOL KIWANTIS CLUB
    one grant, 2020 · $50k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $39k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Central Pennsylvania Food Bank

Our mission is to solve hunger in central pennsylvania by ensuring that everyone struggling with hunger has access to enough wholesome food every day. we will achieve this bold goal with the help of our generous donors, volunteers and…

Food & Nutrition
2
Share Food Program

As the largest serving hunger-relief organization in the greater philadelphia region, share food program's mission is reducing regional food insecurity by providing nourishing food to a network of community-based partners and directly to…

Food & Nutrition
3
Greater Pittsburgh Community Food Bank

Our mission is to leverage the power of community to achieve lasting solutions to hunger and its root causes.

Food & Nutrition
4
Jewish Federation of Greater Pittsburgh

Our vision is a flourishing jewish community where everyone feels included, supported and inspired. in order to accomplish this vision we cultivate resources, connect people and collaborate across the community to live and fulfill jewish…

Philanthropy
5
Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania

The trustees of the university of pennsylvania (the "university") sees itself as having a public service mission. in such regard, the university aims to provide a rich and diverse educational environment for its students; to pioneer…

Education
6
Rolling Harvest Food Rescue

Mission statement: our goal is to increase access to donated fresh produce and other healthy foods to area hunger-relief sites that serve the at-risk, food-insecure population by providing local farmers and food producers with free,…

—
7
Chambersburg Hospital

The chambersburg hospital is a regional non-profit health care organization committed to the improvement of the health and well-being of the people in southcentral pennsylvania.

Health
8
Pennsylvania Association of Regional Food Banks

To strengthen its partner organizations and maximize their potential, advocate for public policy that is favorable and increase food that is available to its partner organizations. hunger-free pennsylvania works to end hunger and food…

—
9
Highlands Hospital

Highlands hospital is committed to providing health care to the community in a competent, nurturing and healing environment. our staff will provide support in times of crisis and furnish the resources necessary to promote a healthy…

Health
10
The Good Samaritan Hospital of Lebanon Pennsylvania

The good samaritan hospital is a tax-exempt organization dedicated to providing high-quality, compassionate healthcare that improves the overall health of the community.

Health
11
Philadelphia Health Partnership
Health
12
The Food Trust

The food trust (tft), a nonprofit founded in philadelphia in 1992, strives to make healthy food available to all.continued on schedule otft is a regional and national leader in developing new strategies to prevent childhood obesity and…

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Philabundance; the most unlike its peers is New Hope-Solebury Community Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 50 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/26
Grantees still filing
19/26
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PROJECT HOME: $724,642 · Human ServicesPROJECT HOMEBUCKS COUNTY OPPORTUNITY COUNCIL INC: $325,800 · Human ServicesBUCKS COUNTY OPPORTUNITY COUNCIL INC+5 more: $78,698 · Human Services+5 moreIndividual grant recipient: $156,850 · OtherIndividual grant recipientBCCC FOUNDATION: $100,000 · OtherBCCC FOUNDATIONMAZON A Jewish Response to Hunger: $95,000 · OtherMAZON A Jewish Response to HungerLEVITTOWN BRISTOL KIWANTIS CLUB: $50,000 · OtherLEVITTOWN BRISTOL KIWANTIS CLUBJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PHILA: $45,000 · OtherJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PHIL…BRISTOL TOWNSHIP SCHOOL DISTRICT: $43,000 · OtherBRISTOL TOWNSHIP SCHOOL DISTRICTIndividual grant recipient: $38,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientNESHAMINY HIGH SCHOOL: $30,000 · Other+25 more: $133,409 · Other+25 morePhilabundance: $262,000 · Food & NutritionPhilabundance+1 more: $5,000 · Food & NutritionJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $165,575 · International+2 more: $2,000 · InternationalUNITED WAY OF BUCKS COUNTY: $25,000 · PhilanthropyNEW HOPE-SOLEBURY COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION: $1,200 · PhilanthropySUNSHINE FOUNDATION: $1,000 · PhilanthropyPassover League of Philadelphia: $22,550 · ReligionTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA: $16,000 · Health
Human Services$1,129,140Other$691,759Food & Nutrition$267,000International$167,575Philanthropy$27,200Religion$22,550Health$16,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPROJECT HOME: $724,642 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetBUCKS COUNTY OPPORTUNITY COUNCIL INC: $325,800 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetPhilabundance: $262,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $165,575 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMAZON A Jewish Response to Hunger: $95,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetTHE PEACE CENTER INC: $30,198 over 5y, 2.4% of budgetJEWISH RELIEF AGENCY: $30,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetUNITED WAY OF BUCKS COUNTY: $25,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetPassover League of Philadelphia: $22,550 over 3y, 31% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA: $16,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBETWEEN FRIENDS OUTREACH INC: $13,000 over 2y, 6.0% of budgetHERITAGE CONSERVANCY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMICHAEL G FITZPATRICK FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 6.9% of budgetROTARY INTERNATIONAL: $8,300 over 3y, 3.9% of budgetSIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINTERFAITH FOOD ALLIANCE: $5,000 over 1y, 7.5% of budgetAMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF CAREGIVING YOUTH INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetNEW HOPE-SOLEBURY COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION: $1,200 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetSUNSHINE FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICARES FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHERAPEUTIC HORSEBACK RIDING INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBUCKS COUNTY SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $850 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLINGOHOCKEN FIRE COMPANY: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PROJECT HOME ↗
  • Who funds BUCKS COUNTY OPPORTUNITY COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds Philabundance ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC ↗
  • Who funds MAZON A Jewish Response to Hunger ↗
  • Who funds THE PEACE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH RELIEF AGENCY ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF BUCKS COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds Passover League of Philadelphia ↗
  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA ↗
  • Who funds BETWEEN FRIENDS OUTREACH INC ↗
  • Who funds HERITAGE CONSERVANCY INC ↗
  • Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds MICHAEL G FITZPATRICK FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ROTARY INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds SIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds INTERFAITH FOOD ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF CAREGIVING YOUTH INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW HOPE-SOLEBURY COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds SUNSHINE FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Foundations Community PartnershipPA17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Foundations Community Partnership · Penn Community Bank Foundation · Bbla Foundation Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Gene & Marlene Epstein Humanitarian Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Gene & Marlene Epstein Humanitarian Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Americares Foundation Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Gene & Marlene Epstein Humanitarian Fund?

Find your warmest path to Gene & Marlene Epstein Humanitarian Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 50 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Gene & Marlene Epstein Humanitarian’s filings →

More from the funding graph