Skip to content
Gemini Industries Inc Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Gemini Industries Inc Foundation

Its FY2023 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$14k
Granted FY2023
10
Grants FY2023
2
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Human Services$26kEmployment$18kReligion$11kFood & Nutrition$10kRecreation & Sports$10kEducation$10kHealth$5kCommunity Improvement$5kOther$0
02FY2023 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES INC$4,400
EL RENO BLESSING BASKETS$2,900
THE LORD'S HARVEST$2,436
EL RENO MOBILE MEALS$1,000
OKLAHOMA BAPTIST HOMES FOR CHILDREN$1,000
EL RENO PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION$1,000
EL RENO QUARTERBACK CLUB$500
OKARCHE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION$500
EL RENO FIRE DEPARTMENT$400
Sacred Heart JrSr High School$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $31k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%City Rescue Mission: $750 → 16%YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES INC: $4k → 9%Youth and Family Services Inc: $3k → 9%Youth and Family Services Inc: $3k → 9%Youth and Family Services Inc: $3k → 9%Youth and Family Services Inc: $3k → 9%Youth and Family Services Inc: $3k → 9%Youth and Family Services Inc: $3k → 9%EL RENO BLESSING BASKETS: $3k → 9%OKLAHOMA BAPTIST HOMES FOR CHILDREN: $1k → 16%El Reno Blessing Baskets: $950 → 9%El Reno Blessing Baskets: $750 → 9%El Reno Blessing Baskets: $700 → 9%Russel-Murray Hospice: $500 → 9%El Reno Blessing Baskets: $500 → 9%El Reno Blessing Baskets: $350 → 9%El Reno Blessing Baskets: $250 → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MI
NY
CO
MO
KS
DC
OK
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$90k · 28 repeat orgs$19k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +92% since the first grant, against +40% for those funded once.

28 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2023, 21 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

28
32

Total granted

$90k
$17k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+92%
+40%

Still filing today

36%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
Human ServicesEducationYouth DevelopmentHealthPublic Safety & DisasterFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES INC
    7× · 2017–2023 · $22k · revenue +143%
  • ER
    EL RENO BLESSING BASKETS INC
    7× · 2017–2023 · $6k · revenue +121%
  • TE
    THE ESOP ASSOCIATION
    4× · 2017–2020 · $4k · revenue +74%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $4k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $2k
  • AT
    Angel Tree (salvation Army)
    one grant, 2017 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Saint Francis Hospital Inc

To extend the presence and healing ministry of christ in all we do.

Health
2
Oklahoma Newspaper Foundation
Arts & Culture
3
Oklahoma State Chamber of Commerce and Industry Inc

The State Chamber is a statewide membership organization. Our purpose is to be the unified voice of business and the most effective advocacy organization at the State Capitol.

—
4
Convenience Distributors Ok
—
5
Northwest Oklahoma Blood Institute
—
6
Oklahoma Association of Realtors

The oklahoma association of realtors connects real estate professionals across the state by providing comprehensive professional resources, maintaining the highest ethical standards and giving realtors a unified voice in shaping oklahoma…

—
7
Oklahoma Heart Research and Education Foundation Inc
Health
8
Oklahoma Academy for State Goals

To provide information to citizens. The organization encourages the utilization and developement of the State of Oklahomas resourses.

—
9
Oklahoma State Medical Association

Osma's vision is to be the leading voice in health care for oklahoma's patients, families and physicians. osma's mission is better health for oklahoma.

—
10
East Central Oklahoma Family Health Center Inc

To provide preventative primary affordable clinical health care, dental and prescription drug coverage to the consumers to include the uninsured and under insured.

Health
11
Oklahoma Association of Electric Cooperatives

The Oklahoma Association of Electric Cooperatives is a statewide association created in 1942 and voluntarily supported by Oklahoma's non-profit electric cooperatives for the purpose to collectively perform services which would not be…

—
12
Oklahomas Credit Union

Providing members with competitive savings and loan products and services so that they can do more with their money.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Russell-Murray Hospice Inc; the most unlike its peers is Southwest Covenant Schools Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 63 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
14/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Campus Crusade for Christ: $10,850 · OtherCampus Crusade for ChristIndividual grant recipient: $7,350 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $4,352 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $4,310 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTHE ESOP ASSOCIATION: $4,000 · OtherTHE ESOP ASSOCIATIONSacred Heart Catholic School: $3,800 · OtherSacred Heart Catholic SchoolIndividual grant recipient: $3,100 · OtherEL RENO QUARTERBACK CLUB: $2,850 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $2,430 · Other+38 more: $19,647 · Other+38 moreYOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES INC: $22,400 · Human ServicesYOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES INCEL RENO BLESSING BASKETS INC: $6,400 · Human ServicesEL RENO BLESSING BASKETS INC+3 more: $2,250 · Human Services+3 moreEl Reno Public School Foundation Inc: $3,550 · EducationOKARCHE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $1,500 · EducationSouthwest Covenant Schools Inc: $250 · EducationFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $4,000 · Youth DevelopmentGirl Scouts Western Oklahoma Inc: $250 · Youth DevelopmentLORDS HARVEST INC: $2,936 · Food & NutritionAmerican Heart Association Inc: $1,025 · HealthNational Kidney Foundation Inc: $100 · HealthNATIONAL FIRE SAFETY COUNCIL INC: $810 · Public Safety & DisasterIslip Fire Department: $250 · Public Safety & DisasterEL RENO MAIN STREET PROGRAM INC: $500 · Community Improvement
Other$62,689Human Services$31,050Education$5,300Youth Development$4,250Food & Nutrition$2,936Health$1,125Public Safety & Disaster$1,060Community Improvement$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetYOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES INC: $22,400 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetEL RENO BLESSING BASKETS INC: $6,400 over 7y, 1.0% of budgetTHE ESOP ASSOCIATION: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $4,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetEl Reno Public School Foundation Inc: $3,550 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetLORDS HARVEST INC: $2,936 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetOKARCHE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $1,500 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetEL RENO CHAMBER & DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $1,275 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $1,025 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOKLAHOMA BAPTIST HOMES FOR CHILDREN INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL FIRE SAFETY COUNCIL INC: $810 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCITY RESCUE MISSION INC: $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRUSSELL-MURRAY HOSPICE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEL RENO MAIN STREET PROGRAM INC: $500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetIslip Fire Department: $250 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGirl Scouts Western Oklahoma Inc: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSouthwest Covenant Schools Inc: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNational Kidney Foundation Inc: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds EL RENO BLESSING BASKETS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ESOP ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES ↗
  • Who funds El Reno Public School Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds LORDS HARVEST INC ↗
  • Who funds OKARCHE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds EL RENO CHAMBER & DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds OKLAHOMA BAPTIST HOMES FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL FIRE SAFETY COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds CITY RESCUE MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds RUSSELL-MURRAY HOSPICE INC ↗
  • Who funds EL RENO MAIN STREET PROGRAM INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Mary K Ashbrook Found…Oklahoma City Communi…Communities Foundatio…United Way of Canadia…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Mary K Ashbrook Foundation for El Reno OkOK22.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Mary K Ashbrook Foundation for El Reno Ok · Oklahoma City Community Foundation Inc · Communities Foundation of Oklahoma · United Way of Canadian County Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Gemini Industries Inc Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Gemini Industries Inc Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 90%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 23%
  • Youth and Family Services Inc: 23% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
9get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 63 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Gemini Industries’ filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home