Skip to content

· Private foundation

Gelfand Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$125k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
—
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Philanthropy$425kReligion$56kYouth Development$53kArts & Culture$52kHealth$50kHuman Services$45kEducation$45kCivil Rights$14kOther$0
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 9 grants below total $107,195, the rows itemized in this filing. The $124,725 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $17,530 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k6 grants · $16k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $41k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$5,000
Median grant
—
States reached
$469k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CAMP MOOSILAUKE FRESH AIR SCHOLARSHIP FUND$50,000
Alzeimers Assoc$30,750
Jewish Federation Of GRE$10,000
EveryChild Foundation$6,000
ANTIDEFAMATION LEAGUE$5,000
Jewish Center Justice$2,365
FranklinPta Fr San Jose$1,500
Nfgfriends of the Bre$1,030
Contributions > $250$550
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–17, $16k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 94% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%THE JOSLYN CENTER: $1k → 11%EVERYCHILD FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%OPICA ADULT DAY CARE CENTER INC: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

22%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$73k · 8 repeat orgs$264k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
34

Total granted

$73k
$171k

Still filing today

0%
26%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 13% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $93k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’20’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’20’23’24
Human ServicesHealthArts & CultureEducationYouth DevelopmentCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SU
    SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2020–2023 · $20k
  • EF
    EVERYCHILD FOUNDATION
    3× · 2020–2024 · $18k
  • TJ
    THE JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER LOS ANGELES
    2× · 2020–2023 · $12k

Funded once

  • US
    UNIVERSITY SYNAGOGUE
    one grant, 2020 · $34k
  • AA
    Alzheimer Association
    one grant, 2023 · $32k
  • US
    UNIVERSITY SYNAGOGUE
    one grant, 2017 · $15k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Jewish Federation of San Diego County

Jewish federation of san diego county is dedicated to building a vibrant, caring, connected, and enduring jewish community.

—
2
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

—
3
Ucla Foundation

The ucla foundation is the giving, receiving, and investing arm of the ucla campus. the foundation enables private donors to help build, sustain and advance one of the world's finest academic and research institutions. private philanthropy…

Education
4
American Foreign Service Association

American foreign service association (afsa) is both the principal advocate for the long-term institutional wellbeing of the professional career foreign service and responsible for safeguarding the interest of afsa members. (continued on…

—
5
Academy of Television Arts and Sciences

The Television Academy is dedicated to celebrating excellence, innovation and the advancement of the telecommunications arts and sciences through recognition, education and leadership, while fostering a diverse, inclusive and accessible…

—
6
Minneapolis Jewish Federation

Minneapolis jewish federation is a nonprofit organization that promotes a culture of philanthropy, leverages resources to meet local and global jewish needs, and facilitates community planning to ensure a thriving and secure future.

Philanthropy
7
Jewish Senior Life

To enhance the quality of life, health, and well-being of jewish older adults, their families, and others in our community, consistent with the values and traditions of our jewish heritage.

Religion
8
Association of Legal Administrators

Ala is the catalyst for growth by providing: diverse educational experiences, engaged peer communities, strategic solutions, dynamic resources, and trusted networks.

—
9
The American College of Trust and Estate Counsel

Enhance the ability of actec members to provide the most efficient and highest quality services to their clients; develop qualified trust and estate counselors; improve and reform probate, trust and tax laws, procedures, and standards of…

Community Improvement
10
California Apartment Association

The organization's mission is to represent the ethical members of the rental housing industry in all aspects of government affairs within the state of california, and to provide information, products and services which contribute to the…

—
11
Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles

We steward $1.5 billion in charitable assets through donor-advised funds, endowments, and other giving vehicles. partnering with 1,400 individuals, families, and organizations, we build enduring legacies and multigenerational impact. in…

Philanthropy
12
American Academy of Dermatology Association Inc

To represent the interests of dermatologists and their patients. to influence and be a credible resource for public and private entities related to all policies and regulations that have the potential to affect the delivery of dermatologic…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Federation Council of Greater La; the most unlike its peers is Palm Springs Art Museum. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 49 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
10/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CAMP MOOSILAUKE FRESH AIR SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $50,000 · OtherCAMP MOOSILAUKE FRESH AIR SCHOLARSHIP FUNDUNIVERSITY SYNAGOGUE: $34,125 · OtherUNIVERSITY SYNAGOGUEAlzheimer Association: $32,000 · OtherAlzheimer AssociationAlzeimers Assoc: $30,750 · OtherAlzeimers AssocSYRACUSE UNIVERSITY: $20,000 · OtherSYRACUSE UNIVERSITYEVERYCHILD FOUNDATION: $18,000 · OtherEVERYCHILD FOUNDATIONUNIVERSITY SYNAGOGUE: $15,000 · OtherTHE JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER LOS ANGELES: $11,500 · OtherJewish Federation Of GRE: $10,000 · OtherBARBARA SINATRA CHILDREN'S CENTER: $10,000 · Other+30 more: $57,838 · Other+30 moreOPICA ADULT DAY PROGRAM & COUNSELING CENTER: $10,000 · Human ServicesThe Everychild Foundation: $5,000 · Human ServicesCove Communities Senior Association DBA The Joslyn Center: $1,000 · Human ServicesALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $15,000 · HealthPALM SPRINGS ART MUSEUM: $10,000 · Arts & CultureTHE SIGMA ALPHA MU FOUNDATION: $10,000 · EducationTHE PAINTED TURTLE: $2,500 · Youth DevelopmentANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $2,000 · Civil RightsJEWISH FEDERATION COUNCIL OF GREATER LA: $1,000 · Philanthropy
Other$289,213Human Services$16,000Health$15,000Arts & Culture$10,000Education$10,000Youth Development$2,500Civil Rights$2,000Philanthropy$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPALM SPRINGS ART MUSEUM: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE SIGMA ALPHA MU FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetOPICA ADULT DAY PROGRAM & COUNSELING CENTER: $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF PALM SPRINGS AND DESERT AREA: $7,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetThe Everychild Foundation: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE PAINTED TURTLE: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION COUNCIL OF GREATER LA: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCove Communities Senior Association DBA The Joslyn Center: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds PALM SPRINGS ART MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds THE SIGMA ALPHA MU FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds OPICA ADULT DAY PROGRAM & COUNSELING CENTER ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF PALM SPRINGS AND DESERT AREA ↗
  • Who funds The Everychild Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Santa Monica Education Foundation ↗
  • Who funds THE PAINTED TURTLE ↗
  • Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION COUNCIL OF GREATER LA ↗
  • Who funds Cove Communities Senior Association DBA The Joslyn Center ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Community Foundation of Los AngelesCA13.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · California Community Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Gelfand Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Gelfand Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Gelfand Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Gelfand Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 49 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Gelfand’s filings →

    More from the funding graph