Skip to content

· Private foundation

Geisel Family Foundation INC

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$82k
Granted FY2025still arriving
26
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$42k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Philanthropy$125kEducation$81kInternational$60kCivil Rights$35kHousing & Shelter$26kEnvironment$21kHealth$15kPublic Safety & Disaster$12kOther$0
02FY2025 · 26 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k24 grants · $29k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $53k
$1,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ACLU Of Georgia$42,000
The Giving Kitchen$10,550
Wikimedia Foundation$5,000
World Central Kitchen$3,000
Mercy Corps$3,000
Jafuta Foundation$2,500
North Fulton Community Charities Inc$2,000
Natn Guatemala$2,000
Southern Environmental Law Center$2,000
Planned Parenthood$1,000
The Drake House$1,000
Southern Poverty Law Center$1,000
States Newsroom$1,000
Standup for kids$1,000
Roswell Arts Funds$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%North Fulton Community Charities Inc: $2k → 13%NORTH FULTON COMMUNITY CHARITIES INC: $1k → 13%NORTH FULTON COMMUNITY CHARITIES INC: $1k → 13%NORTH FULTON COMMUNITY CHARITIES INC: $1k → 13%North Fulton Community Charities Inc: $1k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
OR
CA
CO
VA
TN
DC
AL
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$482k · 25 repeat orgs$12k to everyone else

25 repeat relationships: 20 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
14

Total granted

$482k
$8k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
+35%

Still filing today

68%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalHealthPhilanthropyHousing & ShelterArts & CultureCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TG
    THE GIVING KITCHEN INITIATIVE INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $131k · revenue +484%
  • WF
    WIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $85k · revenue +128%
  • MC
    Mercy Corps
    9× · 2017–2025 · $43k · revenue +19%

Funded once

  • PA
    PAWS ATLANTA INCORPORATED
    one grant, 2021 · $1k · revenue -8%
  • AF
    ALI FORNEY CENTER INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $1k · revenue +158%
  • FB
    FOOD BANK OF NORTH FULTON COUNTY
    one grant, 2020 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
World Resources Institute

Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.": - count it: our work is…

International
2
International Center for Research On Women

The international center for research for women (icrw) is a global research institute, with a mission to advance rights and opportunities for women, girls, and structurally excluded populations with actionable evidence and solutions.

International
3
National Association of Clean Water Agencies

Nacwa is the national voice of public clean water utilities, shaping water policy, convening a vibrant peer network, and empowering water leaders.

—
4
Waterorg

Water.org's goal is to bring safe water and sanitation to the world through access to small, affordable loans.

International
5
Fresh Energy

Shape and drive bold policy solutions to achieve equitable carbon-neutral economies.

Environment
6
Climate Breakthrough Inc

To launch breakthrough climate mitigation efforts by identifying, supporting, and unleashing innovative leaders with transformative strategies.

Human Services
7
Watttime Corporation

To raise awareness about the potential to reduce environmental harm by shifting electricity use to particular times; to encourage the development and spread of common protocols for this practice.

Science & Tech
8
Climate Catalyst Inc

Climate catalyst sparks collective action to tackle the biggest climate challenges we face today: cutting emissions in heavy industries.

Environment
9
The Climate Group Inc

Climate group advances climate action by mobilizing business and government leadership to drive systemic decarbonization across energy, transport, and industry, while engaging the public through large-scale convenings and global platforms.…

Environment
10
Western Resource Advocates

Western Resource Advocates (WRA) is a regional nonprofit advocacy organization fighting climate change and its impacts to sustain the environment, economy, and people of the West. As the region's go-to experts for more than three decades,…

Crime & Legal
11
American Gas Association

American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…

—
12
Grist Magazine Inc

Grist is an independent, non profit media organization dedicated to reporting on climate change.

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wikimedia Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is American Diabetes Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 45 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/27
Grantees still filing
21/27
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE GIVING KITCHEN INITIATIVE INC: $131,179 · PhilanthropyTHE GIVING KITCHEN INITIATIVE …+1 more: $500 · PhilanthropyACLU Of Georgia: $59,000 · OtherACLU Of GeorgiaSOUTHERN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER: $14,500 · OtherSOUTHERN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTERPlanned Parenthood: $11,100 · OtherPlanned ParenthoodStandUp for Kids: $8,000 · OtherWorld Central Kitchen: $8,000 · OtherJafuta Foundation: $6,500 · OtherSIERRA CLUB: $6,000 · OtherNEW GEORGIA PROJECT INC: $7,500 · OtherNORTH FULTON COMMUNITY CHARITIES INC: $6,000 · Other+24 more: $25,152 · Other+24 moreWIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC: $85,000 · EducationWIKIMEDIA FOUNDATIO…Mercy Corps: $43,000 · InternationalMercy CorpsOXFAM-AMERICA INC: $20,000 · InternationalOXFAM-AMERICA INCWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $10,000 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KIT…+2 more: $2,450 · InternationalThe Drake House Inc: $20,000 · Housing & ShelterALI FORNEY CENTER INC: $1,000 · Housing & ShelterSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $19,000 · Crime & LegalWellspring Living Inc: $10,000 · Religion
Philanthropy$131,679Other$151,752Education$85,000International$75,450Housing & Shelter$21,000Crime & Legal$19,000Religion$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE GIVING KITCHEN INITIATIVE INC: $131,179 over 9y, 1.3% of budgetWIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC: $85,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetMercy Corps: $43,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetThe Drake House Inc: $20,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetOXFAM-AMERICA INC: $20,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $19,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER: $14,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetWellspring Living Inc: $10,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetStandUp for Kids: $8,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetNEW GEORGIA PROJECT INC: $7,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH FULTON COMMUNITY CHARITIES INC: $6,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetROSWELL ARTS FUND INC: $4,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetSTATES NEWSROOM: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSIERRA CLUB: $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBIKE ROSWELL INC: $1,700 over 8y, 2.1% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $1,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPAWS ATLANTA INCORPORATED: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALI FORNEY CENTER INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGLSEN INC: $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Diabetes Association: $530 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLEAVING A POSITIVE LEGACY INC: $450 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFOSTER CARE SUPPORT FOUNDATION INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetInternational Mountain Bicycling Association: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE GIVING KITCHEN INITIATIVE INC ↗
  • Who funds WIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Mercy Corps ↗
  • Who funds The Drake House Inc ↗
  • Who funds OXFAM-AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Wellspring Living Inc ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds StandUp for Kids ↗
  • Who funds NEW GEORGIA PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTH FULTON COMMUNITY CHARITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds ROSWELL ARTS FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds STATES NEWSROOM ↗
  • Who funds SIERRA CLUB ↗
  • Who funds NATUN GUATEMALA ↗
  • Who funds BIKE ROSWELL INC ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds PAWS ATLANTA INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds ALI FORNEY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds GLSEN INC ↗
  • Who funds American Diabetes Association ↗
  • Who funds BREAKTHROUGH T1D ↗
  • Who funds LAKE BURTON CIVIC ASSOC FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LEAVING A POSITIVE LEGACY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Imlay Foundation IncGA13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Imlay Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta Inc · Verizon Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Geisel Family Foundation INC funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Geisel Family Foundation INC. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 47%
  • Mercy Corps: 47% of income from government
  • Oxfam-America Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 45 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Geisel Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph