Skip to content

· Private foundation

Geenen Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$210k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$410kHuman Services$130kFood & Nutrition$50kAnimals$20kHealth$15kHousing & Shelter$10kEducation$5k
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $90k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
$20,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$100,000
HARVEST STAND MINISTRIES$45,000
ENGEDI CHURCH$25,000
ZEELAND CHRISTIAN$20,000
OUTDOOR DISCOVERY CENTER$5,000
WINNING AT HOME$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
CALVIN UNIVERSITY$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%JUBILEE MINISTRIES: $5k → 10%CRITTER BARN: $5k → 8%JUBILEE MINISTRIES: $5k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$605k · 10 repeat orgs$35k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +103% since the first grant, against +10% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
4

Total granted

$605k
$25k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+103%
+10%

Still filing today

50%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesAnimalsFood & NutritionReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SF
    Society for Christian Instruction Zeeland
    5× · 2018–2025 · $145k · revenue +21%
  • CA
    COMMUNITY ACTION HOUSE
    3× · 2021–2024 · $25k · revenue +103%
  • ON
    ODC NETWORK
    3× · 2021–2025 · $20k · revenue +109%

Funded once

  • BO
    BEACON OF HOPE
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +10%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
  • CH
    COREWELL HEALTH FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Oakland Christian School

Oakland christian school is committed to providing excellence in education in an environment which is supportive of christian families and their churches.

Education
2
Calvary Schools of Holland

Calvary schools of holland are committed to building christian character and to developing servant leadership in their students within the context of a quality education.

Education
3
Heritage Christian School

At heritage christian school, we exist to serve christ by partnering with parents to provide biblically faithful, academically excellent education.

—
4
Habitat for Humanity of Central Iowa Inc

Habitat for humanity of central iowa, inc. works in partnership with god and people everywhere, from all walks of life, to develop communities with god's people in need by building houses, so that there are decent houses in decent…

—
5
Michigan Christian Home

The michigan christian home dba beacon hill at eastgate, a not-for-profit corporation, provides housing and health services in a christian environment for older adults, thus enabling them to meet their ongoing physical, social and…

—
6
Reformed University Inc

Provide education in theology, divinity, religious education, ministerial training, business and organizational leadership.

Education
7
Greater Houlton Christian Acad

Christian education

Religion
8
Christian Heritage Academy

Christian Heritage Academy exists to educate children with excellent academics that place Christ at the beginning and end of all knowledge and to lead children into lives guided by Christ-centered values and respectful relationships.…

—
9
Holland Christian Education Society

(see schedule o)the mission of the holland christian education society (school) is to provide an education of the highest quality that prepares children to live for christ in a global society that exists in partnership with christian…

—
10
Heartland Christian Homeschool Center

Heartland Christian Homeschool offers quality education including individual instruction, spiritual guidance, and parent training to home schooling families in order to assist in raising up well equipped citizens of character who are…

Education
11
Habitat for Humanity of Michigan Inc

Our mission is to assist our affiliates to increase capacity to build simple decent homes in partnership with people in need in the State of Michigan.

Housing & Shelter
12
Midwest University

Christian institution of higher learning dedicated to the exploration, discernment, sustentation, and dissemination of god's truth. midwest is committed to excellence in education encouraging students to comprehensively consider god's word…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jubilee Ministries Inc; the most unlike its peers is Odc Network. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $130,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientBETHANY CHRISTIAN SERVICES: $125,000 · OtherBETHANY CHRISTIAN SERVICESENGEDI CHURCH: $80,000 · OtherENGEDI CHURCHCOMMUNITY ACTION HOUSE: $25,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY ACTION HOUSE+5 more: $35,000 · Other+5 moreSociety for Christian Instruction Zeeland: $145,000 · EducationSociety for Christian Inst…CALVIN UNIVERSITY: $5,000 · EducationHIS HARVEST STAND: $50,000 · Food & NutritionODC NETWORK: $20,000 · AnimalsJUBILEE MINISTRIES INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesCRITTER BARN: $5,000 · Human ServicesBEACON OF HOPE: $10,000 · Religion
Other$395,000Education$150,000Food & Nutrition$50,000Animals$20,000Human Services$15,000Religion$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSociety for Christian Instruction Zeeland: $145,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetHIS HARVEST STAND: $50,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION HOUSE: $25,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetODC NETWORK: $20,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetJUBILEE MINISTRIES INC: $10,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetBEACON OF HOPE: $10,000 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetCALVIN UNIVERSITY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCRITTER BARN: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Society for Christian Instruction Zeeland ↗
  • Who funds HIS HARVEST STAND ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY ACTION HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds ODC NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds JUBILEE MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds BEACON OF HOPE ↗
  • Who funds CALVIN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds CRITTER BARN ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation of the Holland/Zeeland Area IncMI22× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of the Holland/Zeeland Area Inc · John and Judy Spoelhof Foundation · Douglas & Sandra Dekock Family Foun · Stephen and Valerie Spoelhof Foundation · Grand Haven Area Community Foundation Inc · Craig and Wendy Spoelhof Foundation · Onequest Foundation · Edgar and Elsa Prince Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Geenen Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Geenen Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Geenen Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph