· Private foundation
Craig and Wendy Spoelhof Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k17 grants · $30k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $50k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| HOLLAND CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS | $100,000 |
| BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB | $25,000 |
| FELLOWSHIP CHURCH | $15,000 |
| COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF HOLLAND ZEELAND | $10,000 |
| POTTERS HOUSE | $5,000 |
| MISSION PARTNERS INDIA | $5,000 |
| Mary Free Bed Foundation | $2,000 |
| WINNING AT HOME | $2,000 |
| PEOPLE HELPING PEOPLE | $2,000 |
| GENEVA CAMP & RETREAT CENTER | $1,800 |
| Culture Works | $1,500 |
| HOMECOR | $1,500 |
| Positive Options | $1,000 |
| ENCOMPASS KIDS | $1,000 |
| Special Olympics | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $18k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +59% since the first grant, against -7% for the ones you funded once.
30 repeat relationships — 17 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- HCHOLLAND CHRISTIAN EDUCATION SOCIETY9× · 2017–2025 · $527k · revenue +85%
- KFKIDS' FOOD BASKET INC3× · 2019–2021 · $75k · revenue +44%
- GCGENEVA CAMP & RETREAT CENTER6× · 2017–2025 · $59k · revenue +135%
Funded once
- HCHOPE COLLEGE CAMPUS MINISTRIESone grant, 2019 · $30k
- PHPOTTERS HOUSE PARTNERSHIP PROGRAMone grant, 2017 · $10k
- HCHARBOR CHURCHESone grant, 2020 · $6k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Evangel is a comprehensive christian university that is committed to excellence in educating and equipping students to become spirit empowered servants of god who will impact the church and society globally.
Landmark christian school partners with christian families by equipping college-bound students to embrace a christ-centered worldview, grow as servant leaders, and steward god's unique purpose for their lives.
Global scholars exists so that christian academics are adequately equipped to have a redemptive influence among their students, colleagues, universities and disciplines, at a reasonable cost.
Recognizing god as the source of all truth, wisdom, and knowledge, lansing christian school partners with christian parents to educate children to the full extent of their god-given abilities. we engage students in an academically…
To lead children and their families into a relationship with jesus christ,equipping them in heart and mind to influence the world for god's kingdom.
Cornerstone christian school educates children to become learners-equipped with godly character and biblical truth.
To develop community with the formerly homeless. to offer services to the formerly homeless regardless of race, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, or religious affiliation. to share the love of god with all people we come into contact with.
Valley christian school exists to partner with christian families who desire educational excellence, taught through a biblical worldview, so their children will be prepared for a lifetime of faithfulness and service to jesus christ.
As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.
To provide a ministry in the form of services to the poor and disadvantaged people of the lansing area.
The mission of hospice of holland is to provide the most compassionate and highest quality end-of-life care through physical, emotional, and spiritual support.
A coeducational episcopal day school, preschool through eighth grade, for students of all faiths.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Holland Christian Education Society and the most unlike its peers is Odc Network. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 49 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds HOLLAND CHRISTIAN EDUCATION SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds KIDS' FOOD BASKET INC ↗
- Who funds GENEVA CAMP & RETREAT CENTER ↗
- Who funds MISSION PARTNERS INDIA INC ↗
- Who funds The Potters House ↗
- Who funds HOPE COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds CALVIN UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
- Who funds CULTUREWORKS ↗
- Who funds LAKE MICHIGAN JUNIOR GOLF ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds COMPASSIONATE HEART MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY ACTION HOUSE ↗
- Who funds ODC NETWORK ↗
- Who funds ENCOMPASSKIDS ↗
- Who funds JUBILEE MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds LAKESHORE PREGNANCY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds HOMECOR ↗
- Who funds VOX UNITED ↗
- Who funds HEIGHTS OF HOPE INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of the Holland/Zeeland Area Inc · John and Judy Spoelhof Foundation · Edgar and Elsa Prince Foundation · Stephen and Valerie Spoelhof Foundation · Jim and Ginger Jurries Foundation · Douglas & Sandra Dekock Family Foun · De Witt Families Conduit Foundation · Scott and Janet Spoelhof Foundation · Larry and Karen Mulder Foundation · Grand Haven Area Community Foundation Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Howard Miller Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Craig and Wendy Spoelhof Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Craig and Wendy Spoelhof Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Craig and Wendy Spoelhof Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.