Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Gbedell Moore Memorial Fund

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$25k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What you fund
0190% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Human Services$111kFood & Nutrition$31kEducation$25kHousing & Shelter$22kPublic Safety & Disaster$8kYouth Development$7kCrime & Legal$5kArts & Culture$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$1,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$592k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK$6,000
SALVATION ARMY$5,300
NETWORK OF COMMUNITY MINISTRIES$5,200
AUSTIN STREET CENTER$2,500
PALUXY RIVER CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY$1,500
OUR FRIEND'S PLACE$1,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$1,000
TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY FDN$1,000
ST PHILLIPS SCHOOL & COMM CENTER$500
RICHARDSON AREA YOUNG LIFE$500
Individual grant recipient$300
INCARNATION PLACE$250
YMCA PARK CITIES BRANCH$250
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $50k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%NETWORK OF COMMUNITY MINISTRIES: $6k → 14%YMCA CAMP GRADY SPRUCE: $250 → 16%INCARNATION HOUSE: $500 → 14%YMCA CAMP GRADY SPRUCE: $250 → 16%NETWORK OF COMMUNITY MINISTRIES: $6k → 14%YMCA CAMP GRADY SPRUCE: $250 → 16%INCARNATION HOUSE: $500 → 14%NETWORK OF COMMUNITY MINISTRIES: $5k → 14%INCARNATION HOUSE: $500 → 14%NETWORK OF COMMUNITY MINISTRIES: $5k → 14%INCARNATION HOUSE: $500 → 14%NETWORK OF COMMUNITY MINISTRIES: $5k → 14%INCARNATION HOUSE: $500 → 14%NETWORK OF COMMUNITY MINISTRIES: $5k → 14%INCARNATION HOUSE: $500 → 14%NETWORK OF COMMUNITY MINISTRIES: $5k → 14%INCARNATION HOUSE: $500 → 14%NETWORK OF COMMUNITY MINISTRIES: $4k → 14%INCARNATION PLACE: $250 → 14%NETWORK OF COMMUNITY MINISTRIES: $4k → 14%INCARNATION PLACE: $250 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$215k · 25 repeat orgs$4k to everyone else

25 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
5

Total granted

$215k
$4k

Still filing today

40%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NO
    NETWORK OF COMMUNITY MINISTRIES INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $45k · revenue +433%
  • NT
    NORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK
    8× · 2017–2025 · $31k · revenue +105%
  • AS
    AUSTIN STREET CENTER
    9× · 2017–2025 · $21k · revenue +9%

Funded once

  • SC
    ST CATHERINE'S SCHOOL
    one grant, 2017 · $2k
  • TT
    TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2017 · $1k
  • CO
    CHURCH OF THE INCARNATION
    one grant, 2017 · $500

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education
2
Austin Trinity School

Trinity episcopal school (trinity) is a not-for-profit independent school whose mission is to provide an enriched academic curriculum in a christian environment. trinity is not affiliated with or sponsored by any parish. we will nurture…

Education
3
Leadership Austin

Leadership austin connects and develops leaders to courageously engage and transform our communities.

Youth Development
4
Trinity Charter School

The trinity charter schools system has 11 campuses in texas. all 11 campuses work with youth who have emotional difficulties, and need active engagement in planning and guiding their own academic careers through student led credit…

Education
5
Elevate North Texas

Elevate North Texas offers a welcoming and affirming environment for youth 18-24 experiencing homelessness providing short-term housing and case management. Elevate North Texas addresses youth homelessness from two angles: a hotel program…

Health
6
Downtown Dallas Inc

Downtown Dallas, Inc. (DDI), is the champion of a clean and safe Downtown and of the economic development and vibrancy of this community of diverse, unique neighborhoods. DDI: Mobilizes and amplifies the services of public agencies.…

7
Dallas Christian School

Dallas Christian is a college preparatory school committed to Biblical values where students are prepared for Christ-centered lives of purpose, service and leadership.

Education
8
Feeding Texas

To lead a unified effort for a hunger-free texas.

Community Improvement
9
Episcopal Foundation of Dallas

The foundation's mission is to strengthen and support faith communities by partnering wise investments with purposeful giving.

Religion
10
Society of St Vincent De Paul Community Outreach of North Texas

The St. Vincent Center (SVC) Provide emergency assistance and systemic change relief to those in need in the neighborhoods of Lancaster, Texas, and the surrounding communities.

Food & Nutrition
11
The Woodlands Christian Academy

TWCA is an independent, Christ-centered college preparatory school that integrates learning with biblical faith and challenges our students to reach their highest potential - intellectually, creatively, physically, and socially - for the…

12
Truth Academy Inc

Truth academy works in partnership with families to integrate high-quality education with biblical truth and discipleship in order to train students, spiritually and academically, how to operate in their god-given purpose and live out a…

Religion

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ymca of Metropolitan Dallas Inc and the most unlike its peers is The St Christopher School Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
9/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SALVATION ARMY — $47,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMYNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK — $30,500 · OtherNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANKAUSTIN STREET CENTER — $21,200 · OtherAUSTIN STREET CENTEROUR FRIENDS PLACE — $8,750 · OtherOUR FRIENDS PLACEAMERICAN RED CROSS — $8,000 · Other+18 more — $38,503 · Other+18 moreNETWORK OF COMMUNITY MINISTRIES INC — $45,325 · Human ServicesNETWORK OF COMMUNITY MINI…EVERY AVENUE — $3,500 · Human ServicesEVERY AVENUE+2 more — $1,250 · Human ServicesTEXAS TECH FOUNDATION INC — $8,000 · EducationTHE ST CHRISTOPHER SCHOOL INC — $5,400 · EducationDallas Museum of Art — $2,075 · Arts & Culture
Other$153,953Human Services$50,075Education$13,400Arts & Culture$2,075

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNETWORK OF COMMUNITY MINISTRIES INC — $45,325 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK — $30,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetAUSTIN STREET CENTER — $21,200 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetOUR FRIENDS PLACE — $8,750 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetTEXAS TECH FOUNDATION INC — $8,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ST CHRISTOPHER SCHOOL INC — $5,400 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetEVERY AVENUE — $3,500 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetDallas Museum of Art — $2,075 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetYMCA OF METROPOLITAN DALLAS INC — $750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetINCARNATION PLACE INC — $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NETWORK OF COMMUNITY MINISTRIES INC
  • Who funds NORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK
  • Who funds AUSTIN STREET CENTER
  • Who funds OUR FRIENDS PLACE
  • Who funds TEXAS TECH FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds THE ST CHRISTOPHER SCHOOL INC
  • Who funds EVERY AVENUE
  • Who funds Dallas Museum of Art
  • Who funds YMCA OF METROPOLITAN DALLAS INC
  • Who funds INCARNATION PLACE INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Dallas FoundationTX15.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Dallas Foundation · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Katherine C Carmody Charitable Tuw · W P & Bulah Luse Foundation · The Rees-Jones Foundation · Hillcrest Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Gbedell Moore Memorial Fund funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph