· Private foundation
Gbc International Bank Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k15 grants · $45k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $12k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| APA FAMILY SUPPORT SERVICES | $12,000 |
| HERALD FAMILY CENTER | $9,000 |
| EDUCARE FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| LOS ANGELES EDUCATIONAL PARTNERSHIP | $5,000 |
| ENTREPRENEUR EDUCATIONAL CENTER INC | $5,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $3,000 |
| JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF SOUTHERN CAL | $3,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $3,000 |
| GRANDMA'S HOUSE OF HOPE | $3,000 |
| UNITE-LA INC | $3,000 |
| ASIAN PACIFIC COMMUNITY FUND | $1,000 |
| ORANGE COUNTY ASIAN AND PACIFIC ISLANDER COMMUNITY ALLIANCE INC | $1,000 |
| WEST ANGELES COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION | $1,000 |
| SHORELINE PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION | $1,000 |
| YES (YOUTH EASTSIDE SERVICES) | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–20, $16k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
22 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- AFAPA FAMILY SUPPORT SERVICES7× · 2018–2024 · $54k · revenue +26%
- RBROSE BOWL AQUATICS CENTER4× · 2017–2020 · $26k · revenue +38%
- YEYouth Eastside Services8× · 2017–2024 · $24k · revenue +126%
Funded once
- MPMONTEREY PARK VICTIM FUNDSone grant, 2023 · $10k
- EEEECI ENTREPRENEUR PROGRAMone grant, 2023 · $9k
- SCSHORELINE COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATIONone grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue +16%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of Asian American Community Center of Santa Clara County (AASC) is to provide health, human, and economic development services to low income families and individuals to enable them to become actively participating citizens in…
Asian Pacific Health Care Venture, Inc. is a family of community health centers whose mission is to be the medical home for our patients by providing personalized, quality health care services in a culturally accessible manner.
By advocating for quality early care and education, empowering families with information and financial support, and building the capabilities of educators, Children's Council of San Francisco ensures that every child in San Francisco has…
The mission of seadc is to foster a healthy, thriving and self-sufficient southeast asian community.
The Asian Law Caucus's mission is to promote, advance, and represent the legal and civil rights of Asian American Pacific Islander (AAPI) communities, recognizing that social, economic, political and racial inequalities continue to exist…
To provide life long professional services to support all people with hearing or communication challenges in achieving their goals.
The core mission of ASIAN, Inc. is the empowerment of the Asian American Community to achieve social equality by reducing dependency to create and expand access to opportunities in the areas of business development, housing and education.…
Aapi equity alliance is a coalition of community-based organizations that advocates for the rights and needs of the asian and pacific islander (api) community in the greater los angeles area, with particular focus on low-income, immigrant,…
Palo alto community child care (paccc) partners with parents and regional agencies to provide quality, professional and accessible childhood care, and education.
Since 1979, empowering older adults through advocacy and access to resources essential to their well-being and independence, regardless of language or culture.
To educate our members and the community by developing programs designed to strengthen and expand the potential of asian pacific islander (api) businesses and the api community. sacc's core competency and our competitive advantage is our…
Our mission is to encourage a diverse population of high-need young people to explore their full potential through academic, career, family, and community life. Every year, CYC impacts over 8,000 San Francisco youth and their families,…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Orange County Asian and Pacific Islander and the most unlike its peers is Entrepreneur Educational Cente. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 35 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds APA FAMILY SUPPORT SERVICES ↗
- Who funds ROSE BOWL AQUATICS CENTER ↗
- Who funds Youth Eastside Services ↗
- Who funds LOS ANGELES EDUCATION PARTNERSHIP ↗
- Who funds GRANDMA'S HOUSE OF HOPE ↗
- Who funds SELF-HELP FOR THE ELDERLY ↗
- Who funds Boys & Girls Club of West San Gabriel Valley ↗
- Who funds Junior Achievement of Northern California ↗
- Who funds SOCIAL JUSTICE PARTNERS LOS ANGELES ↗
- Who funds JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA INC ↗
- Who funds AFFORDABLE LIVING FOR THE AGING ↗
- Who funds EDUCARE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WEST ANGELES COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds GIRLS TODAY WOMEN TOMORROW ↗
- Who funds 1979 LEGACY CORP ↗
- Who funds CHINATOWN SERVICE CENTER ↗
- Who funds UNITE-LA INC ↗
- Who funds SHORELINE COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ENTREPRENEUR EDUCATIONAL CENTE ↗
- Who funds VITAL ACCESS CARE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ASIAN PACIFIC AMERICAN COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
- Who funds Asia Pacific Cultural Center ↗
- Who funds Center for Human Services ↗
- Who funds Telegraph Hill Neighborhood Association ↗
- Who funds DELHAVEN COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
- Who funds RICHMOND DISTRICT NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds NORTH EAST MEDICAL SERVICES ↗
- Who funds ASIAN PACIFIC COMMUNITY FUND OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
- Who funds SHORELINE PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ORANGE COUNTY ASIAN AND PACIFIC ISLANDER ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Cathay Bank Foundation · California Community Foundation · Weingart Foundation · The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · The California Wellness Foundation · The Annenberg Foundation · The California Endowment · Asian Pacific Fund · United Way Inc · Elbridge Stuart Foundation Dba Stuart Foundation · Tides Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Gbc International Bank Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Gbc International Bank Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Gbc International Bank Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.