Skip to content

· Private foundation

Gary L and Karen S Taylor Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$31k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
0185% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$39kHuman Services$36kFood & Nutrition$25kAnimals$15kArts & Culture$15kPhilanthropy$8kEducation$7kReligion$6kOther$0
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $11k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $20k
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$328k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RELENTLESS$20,000
GRACE HOUSE AKRON$5,000
THE SALVATION ARMY NEO$5,000
BOARDMAN BAPTIST CHURCH$750
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–24, $35k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%AKRON SNOW ANGELS: $10k → 13%GRACE HOUSE AKRON: $20k → 13%GRACE HOUSE AKRON: $5k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

43%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$92k · 4 repeat orgs$121k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +30% since the first grant, against +5% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
16

Total granted

$92k
$121k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
+5%

Still filing today

25%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $750 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthArts & CultureAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2017–2019 · $31k
  • R
    RELENTLESS
    2× · 2023–2024 · $25k
  • GH
    GRACE HOUSE AKRON INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $25k · revenue +30%

Funded once

  • CO
    COPLEY OUTREACH CENTER
    one grant, 2020 · $25k
  • AS
    Art Sparksgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $15k · revenue +71%
  • FA
    FOREVER AMBER ACRES ANIMAL SANCTUARYgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $15k · revenue +268%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Akron Aids Collaborative

The organization's primary purpose is to broaden the network of caring organizations in the community, to influence social norms that contribute to the prevention and treatment of HIV/AIDS and to increase advocacy for social services for…

Human Services
2
Alpha Phi Alpha Foundation of Akron
—
3
The Huntington-Akron Foundation
Philanthropy
4
Akron Parks Collaborative

To engage the akron, ohio community around the creation and sustainability of vibrant public spaces within the city of akron. we foster and support neighborhood park advocates by enabling them to meet their goals, partner with the city and…

Recreation & Sports
5
Akron Revitalization Committee Inc
Community Improvement
6
Akron History Center

The mission of the Akron History Center is to create an enduring long-lasting free museum-quality exhibit about Akrons history that inspires residents educates young people and welcomes visitors to our community.

Arts & Culture
7
Akron Roundtable

Akron roundtable brings speakers to akron who inform, educate and stimulate listeners on topics of importance to the region, the country and the world.

—
8
Akron Bar Association

To enhance the quality of law and justice through community service and to maintain the integrity of the profession.

—
9
The Akron Marathon Charitable Corporation

At the akron marathon charitable corporation, our mission is to inspire healthier lives and a stronger community through our three-part race series and events. we are committed to creating dynamic, welcoming race experiences that promote…

Philanthropy
10
Leadership Akron

The mission of leadership akron is to inspire, strengthen, and empower leaders. our purpose is to unlock the potential of leaders and serve as a catalyst that drives them to create a greater akron.

Education
11
Akron Black Artist Guild

Exclusively for charitable, religious, educational

Arts & Culture
12
Community Aids NetworkAkron Pride Initi

The organization's mission is to prevent further transmission of HIV through education and risk reduction efforts and to provide housing assistance and other supportive services to people already affected by HIV.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Akron Community Foundation; the most unlike its peers is American Diabetes Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $31,250 · OtherIndividual grant recipientRELENTLESS: $25,000 · OtherRELENTLESSCOPLEY OUTREACH CENTER: $25,000 · OtherCOPLEY OUTREACH CENTERNORTHEAST OHIO BRAIN INJURY FOUNDATION: $12,383 · OtherNORTHEAST OHIO BRAIN INJURY FOUNDATIONTHE SALVATION ARMY NEO: $11,000 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMY NEOHAVEN OF REST MINISTRIES INCORPORATED: $10,000 · OtherHAVEN OF REST MINISTRIES INCORPORATEDYOUNGSTOWN EARLY COLLEGE: $6,500 · OtherBODACIOUSLY MADE MINISTRY: $5,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $5,000 · OtherNICO RUBY FOUNDATION: $5,000 · OtherYOUTH FOR TOMORRROW: $5,000 · OtherCOATS FOR KIDS-CLEVELAND: $5,000 · Other+3 more: $1,100 · OtherGRACE HOUSE AKRON INC: $25,000 · Human ServicesGRACE HOUSE AKRON …Akron Snow Angels: $10,000 · Human ServicesAkron Snow AngelsArt Sparks: $15,000 · Arts & CultureFOREVER AMBER ACRES ANIMAL SANCTUARY: $15,000 · AnimalsAKRON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $2,500 · PhilanthropyAmerican Diabetes Association: $1,000 · HealthDR BOB'S HOME: $500 · Health
Other$147,233Human Services$35,000Arts & Culture$15,000Animals$15,000Philanthropy$2,500Health$1,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGRACE HOUSE AKRON INC: $25,000 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetArt Sparks: $15,000 over 1y, 4.7% of budgetFOREVER AMBER ACRES ANIMAL SANCTUARY: $15,000 over 1y, 19% of budgetAkron Snow Angels: $10,000 over 1y, 9.8% of budgetCOATS FOR KIDS-CLEVELAND: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetAKRON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Diabetes Association: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDR BOB'S HOME: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GRACE HOUSE AKRON INC ↗
  • Who funds Art Sparks ↗
  • Who funds FOREVER AMBER ACRES ANIMAL SANCTUARY ↗
  • Who funds Akron Snow Angels ↗
  • Who funds COATS FOR KIDS-CLEVELAND ↗
  • Who funds AKRON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds American Diabetes Association ↗
  • Who funds DR BOB'S HOME ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Lehner Family FoundationOH13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Lehner Family Foundation · Lloyd L & Louise K Smith Foundation · Akron Community Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Gary L and Karen S Taylor Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Gary L and Karen S Taylor Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Gary L and Karen S Taylor Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph