Skip to content

· Private foundation

Garrigan Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$860k
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$185k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

International$710kArts & Culture$362kYouth Development$295kCommunity Improvement$232kHuman Services$189kRecreation & Sports$125kHousing & Shelter$93kEducation$48kOther$0
02FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $70k
  • $50k–250k9 grants · $790k
$75,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$12M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TEACH RWANDA$185,000
MCKIM COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION$100,000
EL SISTEMA$95,000
PEACEPLAYERS$80,000
EDUCATE GIRLS US$80,000
PILGRIM'S INN$75,000
COMMUNITY BIKE WORKS$60,000
CONCRETE COUCH$60,000
PROMISE NEIGHBORHOODS OF THE LEHIGH VALLEY$55,000
PARTNERS IN HOUSING$40,000
FINE FEATHER FOUNDATION$30,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $189k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 2% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%RESOURCES FOR HUMAN DEVELOPMENT: $3k → 22%PILGRIM'S INN: $75k → 8%RESOURCES FOR HUMAN DEVELOPMENT: $1k → 22%PILGRIM'S INN: $65k → 8%PILGRIM'S INN: $45k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.1M · 14 repeat orgs$65k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
4

Total granted

$2.1M
$35k

Still filing today

86%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $30k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesArts & CultureCommunity ImprovementHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TR
    TEACH RWANDA
    4× · 2021–2024 · $525k · revenue +81% · 91% of their budget
  • PI
    PILGRIMS INN INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $185k · revenue +39%
  • PN
    PROMISE NEIGHBORHOODS OF THE LEHIGH VALLEY
    6× · 2019–2024 · $172k · revenue +462%

Funded once

  • SL
    ST LUKES UNIVERSITY HEALTH NETWORK
    one grant, 2022 · $12k
  • G
    GREENS2TE2AM
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Pinebrook Family Answers

The agency's mission states "pinebrook family answers nurtures and empowers children, adults and families by providing mental health services and community-based programs throughout the greater lehigh valley. we do this through initiatives…

Human Services
2
Ch Pennsylvania Under - 21

Our mission is to serve children and youth facing homelessness and human trafficking, and to protect and safeguard all children. we provide trauma-informed interventions for youth who are in need.covenant house pennsylvania (chpa) remains…

Housing & Shelter
3
Milestone Centers Inc

Milestone provides quality, life-enhancing services that promote wellness and the development of human potential to people with behavioral health and intellectual challenges. each year milestone serves approximately 3,500 residents of…

Health
4
Public Health Management Corporation

Public health management corporation (phmc) is a nonprofit public health institute that creates and sustains healthier communities. phmc uses best practices to improve community health through direct service, partnership, innovation,…

Health
5
East End Cooperative Ministry

Eecm changes the lives of people facing the impacts of poverty. opportunity, transformation, hope.

Human Services
6
Achieveability

Strives to permanently break the cycle of poverty for philadelphia families

Housing & Shelter
7
Youthbuild Dc Public Charter School Inc

Youthbuild pcs seeks to transform the lives of disconnected youth by offering a program, in english and spanish, that combines rigorous academic instruction with vocational training, life and employability skills- building, and community…

Education
8
Common Good Alliance

Founded by a group of passionate individuals, CGA champions the cause of economic and cultural equity within our vibrant communities. Since its inception, CGA has committed itself to fostering flourishing neighborhoods, ensuring that every…

Community Improvement
9
Bridging Initiatives International

Provide holistic and integrated service that address the diverse needs of vulnerable individuals and families experiencing instability as the result of domestic violence and /or homelessness.

Human Services
10
Covenant House Washington Dc

Covenant house washington, dc ("chw") provides shelter, crisis care, community services, and outreach services to youth in the washington dc area.

Human Services
11
Community Life Improvement Center

The Community Life Improvement Center CLIC is a 501c3 non-profit organization that aims to meet the basic, psychological and self-fulfillment needs of any combination of low-income persons, ethnic minorities, women and youth. Our service…

Community Improvement
12
The Children's Institute of Pittsburgh

To heal. to teach. to empower. to amaze.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Promise Neighborhoods of the Lehigh Valley; the most unlike its peers is Educate Girls. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
11/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TEACH RWANDA: $525,000 · InternationalTEACH RWANDAEDUCATE GIRLS: $177,000 · InternationalEDUCATE GIRLS+1 more: $8,000 · InternationalEL SISTEMA: $235,000 · OtherEL SISTEMAMCKIM COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION INC: $170,000 · OtherMCKIM COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION I…COMMUNITY ACTION COMMITTEE OF THE LEHIGH VALLEY INC: $60,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY ACTION COMMITTEE OF…COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS: $48,000 · OtherCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS+4 more: $35,000 · Other+4 moreCOMMUNITY BIKE WORKS: $125,000 · Youth DevelopmentCOMMUNITY BIK…PEACEPLAYERS INTERNATIONAL: $125,000 · Youth DevelopmentPEACEPLAYERS …PILGRIMS INN INC: $185,000 · Human ServicesPILGRIMS I…+1 more: $4,000 · Human ServicesPROMISE NEIGHBORHOODS OF THE LEHIGH VALLEY: $172,000 · Community ImprovementPROMISE N…CONCRETE COUCH: $124,000 · Arts & CulturePartners in Housing Inc: $93,000 · Housing & ShelterFINE FEATHER FOUNDATION: $30,000 · Education
International$710,000Other$548,000Youth Development$250,000Human Services$189,000Community Improvement$172,000Arts & Culture$124,000Housing & Shelter$93,000Education$30,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTEACH RWANDA: $525,000 over 4y, 91% of budgetPILGRIMS INN INC: $185,000 over 3y, 5.0% of budgetEDUCATE GIRLS: $177,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetPROMISE NEIGHBORHOODS OF THE LEHIGH VALLEY: $172,000 over 6y, 4.8% of budgetMCKIM COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION INC: $170,000 over 2y, 38% of budgetCOMMUNITY BIKE WORKS: $125,000 over 4y, 5.7% of budgetPEACEPLAYERS INTERNATIONAL: $125,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetCONCRETE COUCH: $124,000 over 4y, 15% of budgetPartners in Housing Inc: $93,000 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION COMMITTEE OF THE LEHIGH VALLEY INC: $60,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFINE FEATHER FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 1y, 17% of budgetGLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC: $8,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetResources for Human Development Inc: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TEACH RWANDA ↗
  • Who funds PILGRIMS INN INC ↗
  • Who funds EDUCATE GIRLS ↗
  • Who funds PROMISE NEIGHBORHOODS OF THE LEHIGH VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds MCKIM COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY BIKE WORKS ↗
  • Who funds PEACEPLAYERS INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds CONCRETE COUCH ↗
  • Who funds Partners in Housing Inc ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY ACTION COMMITTEE OF THE LEHIGH VALLEY INC ↗
  • Who funds FINE FEATHER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Resources for Human Development Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Lehigh Valley Community FoundationPA13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Lehigh Valley Community Foundation · United Way of the Greater Lehigh Valley · Ppl Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Garrigan Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Garrigan Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Garrigan’s filings →

    More from the funding graph