Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Gammill Family Foundation

Its FY2023 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$174k
Granted FY2021
17
Grants FY2021
2
States reached
$15k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of Gammill Family Foundation’s FY2023 grant dollars went to Community Foundation Of The Ozarks Inc, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2023 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2021, the last year Gammill Family Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 13 organizations, $174k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

9
17
9
18
7
19
13
20
13
21
0
22
0
23

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172023.

Philanthropy$2.6MHuman Services$149kEducation$140kHealth$120kCrime & Legal$50kReligion$42kHousing & Shelter$40kYouth Development$35kOther$0
02FY2021 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2021

  • Under $10k1 grant · $9k
  • $10k–50k16 grants · $165k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MISSOURI STATE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF NURSING$15,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$10,000
THE SALVATION ARMY - MIDLAND DIVISION HQ$10,000
SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN$10,000
37TH JUDICIAL CASA$10,000
OZARKS FOOD HARVEST$10,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY - WEST PLAINS$10,000
BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION OF THE OZARKS$10,000
OZARKS CHRISTIAN ACADEMY$10,000
CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER$10,000
FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH - WEST PLAINS MO$10,000
OZARK ACTION$10,000
MISSOURI STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$10,000
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$10,000
OZARK INDEPENDENT LIVING$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–21, $84k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 18%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 18%CHRISTOS HOUSE: $10k → 19%OZARK ACTION: $10k → 19%OZARK ACTION: $10k → 19%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $10k → 19%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $10k → 19%CHRISTOS HOUSE: $9k → 19%CHRISTOS HOUSE: $5k → 19%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $5k → 19%OZARK ACTION: $5k → 19%CHRISTOS HOUSE: $5k → 19%CHRISTOS HOUSE: $5k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 67% of Gammill Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 99% of the giving stays in MO; read by stated purpose it is 96% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Gammill Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$626k · 24 repeat orgs$8k to everyone else

24 repeat relationships — 17 still active in FY2021, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call). Read against FY2021, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
1

Total granted

$626k
$5k

Still filing today

58%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22
Human ServicesEducationHealthCrime & LegalPhilanthropyFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WV
    West Vue Inc
    4× · 2017–2021 · $40k · revenue +24%
  • TC
    THE CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $35k · revenue +61%
  • CH
    CHRISTOS HOUSE INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $34k · revenue +88%

Funded once

  • SB
    SOUTHWEST BAPTIST UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF NURSING
    one grant, 2020 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Arc of the Ozarks

To be a leader in service delivery for persons with disabilities by providing an array of supports and services to integrate them into their communities and to enhance the quality of their lives.

2
University of the Ozarks

True to our christian heritage, we prepare students from diverse religious, cultural, educational and economic backgrounds to live life fully.

Education
3
Ozarks New Hope Inc

Provide integrated, patient-centered health services designed to meet the needs of all patients, regardless of ability to pay; help the healthcare industry better serve patients & community by promoting public health; supporting…

Health
4
Ozark Health Inc Van Buren Co Mem Hosp & Nursing Home

Acute care hospital, nursing home, rural health clinic, and home health agency

Health
5
Ozark Center

To improve the health of the communities we serve through contemporary, innovative, evidence-based, trauma-informed, quality behavioral healthcare solutions.

Health
6
Community Blood Center of the Ozarks

Our mission is to provide a quality blood supply, in a timely manner, at the lowest reasonable fee, while remaining accountable to the local community, blood donors and health care providers.

Health
7
Ssm Health Care of Oklahoma Inc

Through our exceptional health care services, we reveal the healing presence of god.

Health
8
Ozarks Resource Group

The mission of ozarks community health center is to provide greater access to quality, compassionate, and professional healthcare through our comprehensive health system and community partnerships.

Health
9
Ozark Opportunities Inc

To render constructive civic service, including the sponsorship of social, educational, and economic projects for the promotion of the welfare of the community and the citizens of the ozarks situated in baxter, boone, marion, newton,…

Community Improvement
10
Healthcare Services of the Ozarks Inc

To provide high quality care and set the standards of excellence for those we serve.

Health
11
Saint Francis Hospital Inc

To extend the presence and healing ministry of christ in all we do.

Health
12
Crisis Nursery of the Ozarks Inc

Provide immediate refuge for children ages birth to 12 whose families are experiencing an unexpected, unstable, or serious condition or crisis.

Crime & Legal

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Foundation of the Ozarks Inc and the most unlike its peers is Southwest Baptist University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
12/15
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE OZARKS INC — $2,616,508 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE OZARKS INC+1 more — $45,000 · PhilanthropyMISSOURI STATE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF NURSING — $70,000 · OtherMISSOURI S…West Vue Inc — $40,000 · OtherWest Vue I…BOYS & GIRLS CLUB — $35,000 · OtherBOYS & GIR…FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH — $22,000 · OtherFIRST BAPT…FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH - WEST PLAINS MO — $20,000 · OtherFIRST BAPT…HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL — $20,000 · OtherHABITAT FO…THE SALVATION ARMY - MIDLAND DIVISION HQ — $20,000 · OtherTHE SALVAT…HABITAT FOR HUMANITY - WEST PLAINS — $20,000 · OtherHABITAT FO…SALVATION ARMY — $20,000 · OtherSALVATION …DISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS CHAPTER 43 — $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $10,000 · Other+2 more — $8,000 · OtherCHRISTOS HOUSE INC — $34,000 · Human ServicesOZARK ACTION INC — $25,000 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $25,000 · Human ServicesOZARK INDEPENDENT LIVING — $25,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $25,000 · HealthSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN — $25,000 · HealthOZARKS CHRISTIAN ACADEMY — $30,250 · EducationSOUTHWEST BAPTIST UNIVERSITY — $20,000 · EducationMISSOURI STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $15,000 · EducationTHE CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER INC — $35,000 · Crime & Legal37TH JUDICIAL COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES — $15,000 · Crime & LegalOZARKS FOOD HARVEST INC — $20,000 · Food & Nutrition
Philanthropy$2,661,508Other$295,000Human Services$84,000Health$75,000Education$65,250Crime & Legal$50,000Food & Nutrition$20,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE OZARKS INC — $2,616,508 over 2y, 5.2% of budgetBREAST CANCER FOUNDATION OF THE OZARKS — $45,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetWest Vue Inc — $40,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER INC — $35,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetCHRISTOS HOUSE INC — $34,000 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetOZARKS CHRISTIAN ACADEMY — $30,250 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetOZARK INDEPENDENT LIVING — $25,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $25,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN — $25,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetOZARK ACTION INC — $25,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $25,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHWEST BAPTIST UNIVERSITY — $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOZARKS FOOD HARVEST INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget37TH JUDICIAL COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES — $15,000 over 2y, 5.7% of budgetMISSOURI STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE OZARKS INC
  • Who funds BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION OF THE OZARKS
  • Who funds West Vue Inc
  • Who funds THE CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER INC
  • Who funds CHRISTOS HOUSE INC
  • Who funds OZARKS CHRISTIAN ACADEMY
  • Who funds OZARK INDEPENDENT LIVING
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
  • Who funds SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN
  • Who funds OZARK ACTION INC
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
  • Who funds SOUTHWEST BAPTIST UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds OZARKS FOOD HARVEST INC
  • Who funds 37TH JUDICIAL COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES
  • Who funds MISSOURI STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of the Ozarks IncMO21.4× affinity8 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of the Ozarks Inc · Dr Nancy O'Reilly Family Foundation · Musgrave Foundation · Arvest Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Gammill Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph