Skip to content
Galloway Ridge Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Galloway Ridge Inc

Galloway ridge exists to inspire meaningful and engaged lives and to assure each resident a superior quality of life and care.

$136k
Granted FY2024still arriving
13
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$177kFood & Nutrition$129kEducation$84kYouth Development$69kHousing & Shelter$53kHuman Services$33kCrime & Legal$18kEmployment$17kOther$0
02FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 13 grants below total $117,052, the rows itemized in this filing. The $136,052 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $19,000 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k7 grants · $50k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $68k
$8,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$143M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WEST CHATHAM CARING COMMUNITIES$15,000
CHATHAM CARES COMMUNITY PHARMACY$12,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF CENTRAL CAROLINA WREN FAMILY CENTER$10,500
LOVE CHATHAM$10,000
CHATHAM TRADES INC$10,000
HISPANIC LIAISON OF CHATHAM COUNTY$10,000
CENTRAL CAROLINA COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION$8,000
THE LEARNING TRIAL INC$8,000
TRIANGLE YOUTH MUSIC$8,000
EL FUTURO INC$7,000
AUTISM SOCIETY OF NORTH CAROLINA INC$7,000
THE CONFIDENCE PROJECT$5,794
JORDAN-MATTHEWS HIGH SCHOOL ARTS FOUNDATION$5,758
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%HISPANIC LIAISON OF CHATHAM COUNTY: $10k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$525k · 13 repeat orgs$70k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +68% since the first grant, against +63% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
4

Total granted

$525k
$30k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+68%
+63%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 66% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $40k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHealthYouth DevelopmentCrime & LegalHousing & ShelterEmploymentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WC
    WEST CHATHAM CARING COMMUNITIES
    8× · 2017–2024 · $73k · revenue +233%
  • BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF CENTRAL CAROLINA
    7× · 2018–2024 · $64k · revenue +276%
  • EL FUTURO INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $61k · revenue +66%

Funded once

  • UNC HEALTH FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $15k · revenue +145%
  • COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF CHATHAM COUNTY
    one grant, 2018 · $5k · revenue +16%
  • CORA Community Overcoming Relationship Abusegraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +63%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Chatham Transit Network

To provide transportation services to human service agencies and the rural general public in chatham county.

Human Services
2
Carolina Family Health Centers Inc

Carolina Family Health Centers, Inc. provides accessible and affordable health care with excellence...where patients come FIRST

—
3
Carolina Community Care Inc

The mission of hospice & community care is to give hope, comfort, and compassion to those that need it most. hospice & community care is a nonprofit healthcare organization providing hospice and palliative care to residents of york,…

—
4
Ucc Living Centers Incorporated

To provide affordable housing to senior citizens in chapel hill, nc.

Housing & Shelter
5
Carolina Family Connections

Recruit and train and license foster parents to receive foster children from county government agencies.

Human Services
6
Charlotte Community Health Clinic Inc

Provide the highest quality, patient-centered health care services for low-income and other underserved individuals.

Health
7
Chatham Hospital Inc

To support the health and well-being of those we serve through quality, equitable healthcare and to build partnerships within our diverse community.

—
8
Carolina Children's Charity Inc

To provide support to lowcountry children with birth defects and/or childhood diseases.

Health
9
Care Share Health Alliance Inc

Care share health alliance is a north carolina-based nonprofit organization advancing community health and wellbeing through systems change. guided by the mission of collaborating for health and a vision of communities that are healthy and…

Health
10
Community Health Accreditation Program Inc

Advance the highest quality of home and community-based care.

Health
11
Coastal Carolinas Health Alliance

Facilitate networking among hospitals

Health
12
Chatham Charter School

Operation of a public charter school.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Chatham County Council On Aging Inc; the most unlike its peers is Cora Community Overcoming Relationship Abuse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
17/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WEST CHATHAM CARING COMMUNITIES: $73,350 · OtherWEST CHATHAM CARING COMMUNITIESCHATHAM COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING INC: $50,800 · OtherCHATHAM COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING INCChatham Habitat for Humanity Inc: $40,000 · OtherChatham Habitat for Humanity IncCHATHAM OUTREACH ALLIANCE INC: $33,000 · OtherCHATHAM OUTREACH ALLIANCE INCAUTISM SOCIETY OF NORTH CAROLINA INC: $21,000 · OtherAUTISM SOCIETY OF NORTH CAROLINA INCLOVE CHATHAM: $10,000 · Other+4 more: $23,758 · Other+4 moreCHATHAM CARES COMMUNITY PHARMACY: $70,350 · HealthCHATHAM CARES COMMUNITY P…EL FUTURO INC: $61,000 · HealthEL FUTURO INCTHE LEARNING TRAIL INC: $35,000 · EducationTHE LEARNING TR…CENTRAL CAROLINA COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUND: $28,000 · EducationCENTRAL CAROLIN…UNC HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 · EducationUNC HEALTH FOUN…The Confidence Project Inc: $5,794 · EducationThe Confidence …BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF CENTRAL CAROLINA: $64,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS AND GIRL…COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF CHATHAM COUNTY: $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentCOMMUNITIES I…LEGAL AID OF NORTH CAROLINA INC: $18,000 · Crime & LegalCHATHAM TRADES INC: $17,000 · EmploymentPRESERVING HOME INC: $13,000 · Housing & ShelterHISPANIC LIAISON OF CHATHAM COUNTY: $10,000 · Human Services
Other$251,908Health$131,350Education$83,794Youth Development$69,000Crime & Legal$18,000Employment$17,000Housing & Shelter$13,000Human Services$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWEST CHATHAM CARING COMMUNITIES: $73,350 over 8y, 8.8% of budgetCHATHAM CARES COMMUNITY PHARMACY: $70,350 over 8y, 12% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF CENTRAL CAROLINA: $64,000 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetEL FUTURO INC: $61,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetCHATHAM COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING INC: $50,800 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetChatham Habitat for Humanity Inc: $40,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetTHE LEARNING TRAIL INC: $35,000 over 6y, 8.7% of budgetCHATHAM OUTREACH ALLIANCE INC: $33,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetCENTRAL CAROLINA COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUND: $28,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetAUTISM SOCIETY OF NORTH CAROLINA INC: $21,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLEGAL AID OF NORTH CAROLINA INC: $18,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCHATHAM TRADES INC: $17,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetUNC HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPRESERVING HOME INC: $13,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetHISPANIC LIAISON OF CHATHAM COUNTY: $10,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetTRIANGLE YOUTH MUSIC INC: $8,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetThe Confidence Project Inc: $5,794 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF CHATHAM COUNTY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetCORA Community Overcoming Relationship Abuse: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHATHAM COUNTY LITERACY COUNCIL INC: $5,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Triangle Community Fo…United Way of Chatham…The Cannon Foundation…Duke Energy FoundationWren Foundation IncThe Leon Levine Found…North Carolina Commun…Carolina Meadows IncAmador Foundation IncThe Mary Duke Biddle …Z Smith Reynolds Foun…The Winston-Salem Fou…
Triangle Community Foundation IncNC37.2× affinity16 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Triangle Community Foundation Inc · United Way of Chatham County · The Cannon Foundation Inc · Duke Energy Foundation · Wren Foundation Inc · The Leon Levine Foundation · North Carolina Community Foundation · Carolina Meadows Inc · Amador Foundation Inc · The Mary Duke Biddle Foundation Missionpost Pmb #101 · Z Smith Reynolds Foundation Inc · The Winston-Salem Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Galloway Ridge Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Galloway Ridge Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Galloway Ridge’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home