· Public charity
Galloway Ridge Inc
Galloway ridge exists to inspire meaningful and engaged lives and to assure each resident a superior quality of life and care.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 13 grants below total $117,052 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $136,052 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $19,000 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k7 grants · $50k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $68k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| WEST CHATHAM CARING COMMUNITIES | $15,000 |
| CHATHAM CARES COMMUNITY PHARMACY | $12,000 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF CENTRAL CAROLINA WREN FAMILY CENTER | $10,500 |
| CHATHAM TRADES INC | $10,000 |
| HISPANIC LIAISON OF CHATHAM COUNTY | $10,000 |
| LOVE CHATHAM | $10,000 |
| TRIANGLE YOUTH MUSIC | $8,000 |
| CENTRAL CAROLINA COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION | $8,000 |
| THE LEARNING TRIAL INC | $8,000 |
| AUTISM SOCIETY OF NORTH CAROLINA INC | $7,000 |
| EL FUTURO INC | $7,000 |
| THE CONFIDENCE PROJECT | $5,794 |
| JORDAN-MATTHEWS HIGH SCHOOL ARTS FOUNDATION | $5,758 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY24–24, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +68% since the first grant, against +63% for the ones you funded once.
13 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 66% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $40k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- WCWEST CHATHAM CARING COMMUNITIES8× · 2017–2024 · $73k · revenue +233%
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF CENTRAL CAROLINA7× · 2018–2024 · $64k · revenue +276%
EL FUTURO INC8× · 2017–2024 · $61k · revenue +66%
Funded once
UNC HEALTH FOUNDATION INCgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $15k · revenue +145%
COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF CHATHAM COUNTYone grant, 2018 · $5k · revenue +16%
CORA Community Overcoming Relationship Abusegraduatedone grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +63%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To provide transportation services to human service agencies and the rural general public in chatham county.
Carolina Family Health Centers, Inc. provides accessible and affordable health care with excellence...where patients come FIRST
The mission of hospice & community care is to give hope, comfort, and compassion to those that need it most. hospice & community care is a nonprofit healthcare organization providing hospice and palliative care to residents of york,…
To provide affordable housing to senior citizens in chapel hill, nc.
Recruit and train and license foster parents to receive foster children from county government agencies.
Provide the highest quality, patient-centered health care services for low-income and other underserved individuals.
To support the health and well-being of those we serve through quality, equitable healthcare and to build partnerships within our diverse community.
To provide support to lowcountry children with birth defects and/or childhood diseases.
Care share health alliance is a north carolina-based nonprofit organization advancing community health and wellbeing through systems change. guided by the mission of collaborating for health and a vision of communities that are healthy and…
Advance the highest quality of home and community-based care.
Facilitate networking among hospitals
Operation of a public charter school.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Chatham County Council On Aging Inc and the most unlike its peers is Cora Community Overcoming Relationship Abuse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds WEST CHATHAM CARING COMMUNITIES ↗
- Who funds CHATHAM CARES COMMUNITY PHARMACY ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF CENTRAL CAROLINA ↗
- Who funds EL FUTURO INC ↗
- Who funds CHATHAM COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING INC ↗
- Who funds Chatham Habitat for Humanity Inc ↗
- Who funds THE LEARNING TRAIL INC ↗
- Who funds CHATHAM OUTREACH ALLIANCE INC ↗
- Who funds CENTRAL CAROLINA COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUND ↗
- Who funds AUTISM SOCIETY OF NORTH CAROLINA INC ↗
- Who funds LEGAL AID OF NORTH CAROLINA INC ↗
- Who funds CHATHAM TRADES INC ↗
- Who funds UNC HEALTH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds PRESERVING HOME INC ↗
- Who funds HISPANIC LIAISON OF CHATHAM COUNTY ↗
- Who funds TRIANGLE YOUTH MUSIC INC ↗
- Who funds The Confidence Project Inc ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF CHATHAM COUNTY ↗
- Who funds CORA Community Overcoming Relationship Abuse ↗
- Who funds CHATHAM COUNTY LITERACY COUNCIL INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Triangle Community Foundation Inc · United Way of Chatham County · The Cannon Foundation Inc · Duke Energy Foundation · Wren Foundation Inc · The Leon Levine Foundation · North Carolina Community Foundation · Carolina Meadows Inc · Amador Foundation Inc · The Mary Duke Biddle Foundation Missionpost Pmb #101 · Z Smith Reynolds Foundation Inc · The Winston-Salem Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Galloway Ridge Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.