Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Gallant Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$410k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$102k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20222025.

Arts & Culture$478kEducation$332kHuman Services$307kFood & Nutrition$185kEnvironment$110kPhilanthropy$43kCommunity Improvement$5kReligion$4kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $830
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $207k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $202k
$25,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$8.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ELIOT PRATT EDUCATION CENTER$101,815
AMERICAN DANCE FESTIVAL$50,000
CAMELLAS CUPBARD$50,000
VILLAGE CENTER FOR THE ARTS$37,520
FRIENDS OF SULLIVAN FARM INC$30,000
PILOBOLUS INC$30,000
BOBBIES PLACE INC$25,000
GASPARD & DANCERS$24,770
LITERACY VOLUNTEERS ON THE GREEN$21,450
THE CHILDRENS CENTER$15,133
UNITED WAY OF WESTERN CT$11,850
ASSOCIATION OF RELIGIOUS COMUNITIES$11,500
UNITED JEWISH CENTER OF DANBURY$500
NORTH CAROLINA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$330
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–25, $74k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 34% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%BOBBIES PLACE INC: $25k → 20%ASSOCIATION OF RELIGIOUS COMUNITIES: $13k → 9%ASSOCIATION OF RELIGIOUS COMUNITIES: $13k → 9%ASSOCIATION OF RELIGIOUS COMUNITIES: $12k → 9%ASSOCIATION OF RELIGIOUS COMUNITIES: $12k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.3M · 15 repeat orgs$163k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +15% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

15 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
6

Total granted

$1.3M
$137k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+15%
0%

Still filing today

73%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $26k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesFood & NutritionEducationPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • VC
    Village Center for the Arts Inc
    4× · 2022–2025 · $153k · revenue +8%
  • CC
    CAMELLAS CUPBOARD INCORPORATED
    4× · 2022–2025 · $135k · revenue +15% · 27% of their budget
  • GI
    GASPARD&DANCERS INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $82k · revenue +47%

Funded once

  • EP
    ELIOT PRAT NATURE CENTER INC
    one grant, 2022 · $100k
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF NEW MILFORD PUBLIC LIBRARY INC
    one grant, 2022 · $15k
  • CC
    COMMUNITY CULINARY SCHOOL OF NORTHWEST CONN
    one grant, 2022 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ariel Rivka Dance Inc

Ariel Rivka Dance (ARD) is an all-female contemporary dance company based in New Jersey led by Artistic Director Ariel Grossman that creates a space for open-hearted movement collaborations rooted in womens experiences. With live…

Arts & Culture
2
Clay Art Center Inc

Clay art center is dedicated to education, creativity, and community engagement through clay by providing an inclusive space for learning, studio practice, exhibitions, personal growth, and professional development in ceramic arts.

Arts & Culture
3
Arts in Ct

Arts in ct is committed to bringing the arts into diverse communities and art deserts to help individuals of all ages, abilities, cultures, religions, and socioeconomic backgrounds to pursue their creative and artistic dreams.

Arts & Culture
4
Hartford Dance Collective

The primary objectives and purpose of the Hartford Dance Collective (The Dance Collective) is to provide performance opportunities in dance for female choreographers and to share professional contemporary dance with new audiences by…

Arts & Culture
5
Meals-On-Wheels of New Canaan Inc

Our mission is to ensure that every potential client identified by the town of new canaan or the southwestern connecticut commission on aging, or referred to us by family, friends, medical personnel, or church group will be serviced for as…

Community Improvement
6
New Community Cinema Club Inc Dba Cinema Arts Centre

The mission of the Cinema Arts Centre is to bring the best in cinematic artistry to Long Island and to use the power of film to expand the awareness and consciousness of our community.

7
Act of Connecticut

A.c.t. of ct's mission is to elevate the level of entertainment in fairfield county and to foster a sense of community through the arts by producing exceptional theater and encouraging an environment of inclusivity and artistic excellence.

Arts & Culture
8
The Milford Fine Arts Council Inc

The milford arts council shall support and foster artistic, cultural and educational opportunities for the benefit of the greater milford community through the creation of environments and programs for artists to work and present; as well…

9
The Arc of Litchfield County Inc

Continued from parts i & iii: choice, respect, and dignity. larc is a local chapter of the arc, the largest community based organization for those with intellectual and developmental disabilities. on a daily basis, larc supports 135…

Human Services
10
Southeastern Connecticut Cultural Coalition

To improve the economy, vitality and quality of life in southeastern ct by supporting the arts, cultural and creative community.

Arts & Culture
11
Greenwich Arts Council Inc

To encourage individual creativity and to broaden community participation in, appreciation of, and support for the visual, performing, and literary arts.

Arts & Culture
12
Cultural Alliance of Western Connecticut Inc

To empower the professional arts community to grow the economy and enrich people's lives.

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Northwest Connecticut Land Conservancy Inc and the most unlike its peers is Camellas Cupboard Incorporated. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
9/16
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ELIOT PRATT EDUCATION CENTER — $247,381 · OtherELIOT PRATT EDUCATION CENTERTHE CHILDRENS CENTER — $158,307 · OtherTHE CHILDRENS CENTERVillage Center for the Arts Inc — $153,230 · OtherVillage Center for the Arts IncELIOT PRAT NATURE CENTER INC — $100,000 · OtherELIOT PRAT NATURE CENTER INCTRIANGLE FAMILY SERVICES INC — $75,000 · OtherTRIANGLE FAMILY SERVICES INC+9 more — $45,865 · Other+9 moreAMERICAN DANCE FESTIVAL INC — $182,000 · Arts & CultureAMERICAN DANCE FESTIVAL I…GASPARD&DANCERS INC — $82,470 · Arts & CultureGASPARD&DANCERS INCPILOBOLUS INC — $60,058 · Arts & CulturePILOBOLUS INCCAMELLAS CUPBOARD INCORPORATED — $135,000 · Food & NutritionCAMELLAS C…Association of Religious Communities Inc — $48,650 · Human ServicesBOBBIES PLACE INC — $25,000 · Human ServicesLITERACY VOLUNTEERS ON THE GREEN — $59,440 · EducationFRIENDS OF SULLIVAN FARM INC — $50,000 · Youth DevelopmentUNITED WAY OF COASTAL AND WESTERN CONNECTICUT INC — $42,074 · Philanthropy+1 more — $660 · Philanthropy
Other$779,783Arts & Culture$324,528Food & Nutrition$135,000Human Services$73,650Education$59,440Youth Development$50,000Philanthropy$42,734

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetAMERICAN DANCE FESTIVAL INC — $182,000 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetVillage Center for the Arts Inc — $153,230 over 4y, 15% of budgetCAMELLAS CUPBOARD INCORPORATED — $135,000 over 4y, 27% of budgetGASPARD&DANCERS INC — $82,470 over 3y, 21% of budgetTRIANGLE FAMILY SERVICES INC — $75,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetPILOBOLUS INC — $60,058 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetLITERACY VOLUNTEERS ON THE GREEN — $59,440 over 4y, 11% of budgetFRIENDS OF SULLIVAN FARM INC — $50,000 over 2y, 19% of budgetAssociation of Religious Communities Inc — $48,650 over 4y, 1.9% of budgetUNITED WAY OF COASTAL AND WESTERN CONNECTICUT INC — $42,074 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetNORTHWEST CONNECTICUT LAND CONSERVANCY INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNEW MILFORD COMMUNITY AMBULANCE INC — $2,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetGREATER WASHINGTON COALITION FOR JEWISH LIFE INC — $2,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetNORTH CAROLINA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $660 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetARTS ESCAPE INC — $200 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Connecticut Community FoundationCT19.8× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Connecticut Community Foundation · The Ellen Knowles Harcourt Foundation · Savings Bank of Danbury Foundation Inc · Union Savings Bank Foundation Inc · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Network for Good · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Gallant Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 30%2%8%17%30%your share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 6%
  • United Way of Coastal and Western Connecticut Inc11% of income from government
  • Northwest Connecticut Land Conservancy Inc9% of income from government
  • Association of Religious Communities Inc6% of income from government
  • Pilobolus Inc1% of income from government
  • Village Center for the Arts Inc1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Gallant Family Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Gallant Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph