Skip to content

· Private foundation

Gag Charitable Corporation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$45k
Granted FY2024still arriving
44
Grants FY2024still arriving
11
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Environment$28kArts & Culture$27kCrime & Legal$15kFood & Nutrition$14kEducation$14kHealth$9kCivil Rights$8kPublic Benefit$4kOther$0
02FY2024 · 44 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
11
States reached
$1.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VOICES FOR CHILDREN INC$5,000
KLAMATH-SISKIYOU WILDLANDS CENTER$4,000
NATIONAL DANCE INSTITUTE$3,000
CLAREMONT-MCKENNA COLLEGE BAUER CEN$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
NATURE COLLECTIVE SAN ELIJO LAG CON$1,500
SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER$1,500
PUBLIC RADIO TELEVISION KQED$1,500
NATIONAL M S SOCIETY-NORTHERN CA CH$1,500
GRAND CANYON TRUST$1,500
FORT BRAGG FOOD BANK$1,250
FEEDING SAN DIEGO FOOD BANK$1,000
PUBLIC CITIZEN FOUNDATION$1,000
WILLIAMS COLLEGE$1,000
RUCH OUTDOOR COMMUNITY SCHOOL$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–24, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%BY THE BAY HEALTH: $500 → 10%BY THE BAY HEALTH: $500 → 10%COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER: $1k → 11%COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER: $1k → 11%COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER: $1k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WI
NY
MA
OR
PA
CT
CA
AZ
KS
DC
AL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$137k · 46 repeat orgs$2k to everyone else

46 repeat relationships: 43 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

46
3

Total granted

$137k
$2k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+12%
+21%

Still filing today

63%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $430 went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24
EnvironmentHealthArts & CultureHuman ServicesEducationAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SP
    SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $5k · revenue +7%
  • TG
    THE GRAND CANYON TRUST INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $5k · revenue +29%
  • PC
    PUBLIC CITIZEN FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $4k · revenue +43%

Funded once

  • MC
    MENDOCINO COAST DIST HOSP HOSPICE P
    one grant, 2022 · $750
  • SF
    SAN FRANCISCO FIRST TEE
    one grant, 2022 · $500 · revenue -3%
  • SE
    Schepens Eye Research Institute Inc
    one grant, 2022 · $500
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sustainable Conservation

Sustainable Conservation advances the collaborative stewardship of Californias land, air, and water for the benefit of nature and people. For over three decades, Sustainable Conservation has built coalitions of people with different…

Environment
2
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
3
Sonoma Botanical Garden
—
4
Food Forward Inc

Food forward fights hunger and prevents food waste by rescuing fresh surplus produce, connecting this abundance with people experiencing food insecurity, and inspiring others to do the same.

Food & Nutrition
5
Oregon Agricultural Trust

Oregon agricultural trust partners with farmers and ranchers to protect agricultural lands for the benefit of oregons economy, communities, and landscapes.

Environment
6
Parks California

As california state parks' statutory non-profit partner, we have a clear mission - to help strengthen parks and inspire all people to experience these extraordinary places.

Environment
7
Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden

Rancho santa ana botanic gardens promotes botany, conservation, and horticulture to inspire, inform and educate the public and scientific community about california's native flora. the garden is devoted to the collection, cultivation,…

Environment
8
San Francisco Bay Bird Observatory

The San Francisco Bay Bird Observatory is dedicated to the conservation of birds and their habitats through science and outreach.

Environment
9
California Ocean Science Trust

California ocean science trust (ost) is a non-profit organization dedicated to accelerating progress towards a healthy and productive ocean future for california. created by state legislation, ost bridges the gap between cutting-edge…

Environment
10
California Institute for Biodiversity

Create and publish educational materials, conduct professional development, promote awareness, and sponsor research on the spectacular biological diversity of the State of CA.

Education
11
Pacific Coast Farmers Market Association

Our mission is to support california farmers and communities by providing farmers markets for our diverse bay area neighborhoods. we do this by operating certified farmers markets in six bay area counties. these farmers markets provide…

—
12
Friends of the Earth

Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Resource Center; the most unlike its peers is National Dance Institute. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

33 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 33 of the 50 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
31/33
Grantees still filing
18/33
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CLAREMONT-MCKENNA COLLEGE BAUER CEN: $6,000 · OtherCLAREMONT-MCKENNA COLLEGE BAUER CENIndividual grant recipient: $6,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientNATURE COLLECTIVE SAN ELIJO LAG CON: $4,500 · OtherNATURE COLLECTIVE SAN ELIJO LAG CONPUBLIC RADIO TELEVISION KQED: $4,250 · OtherPUBLIC RADIO TELEVISION KQEDMendocino Food and Nutrition Inc: $3,250 · OtherPUBLIC RADIO TELEVISION-KPBS: $3,000 · OtherPUBLIC RADIO JPR FOUNDATION: $3,000 · OtherRUCH OUTDOOR COMMUNITY SCHOOL: $3,000 · OtherNATIONAL M S SOCIETY-NORTHERN CA CH: $3,000 · OtherAMERICAN FRIENDS SERVICE COMMITTEE: $3,000 · OtherFEEDING SAN DIEGO FOOD BANK: $3,000 · OtherSAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK: $2,550 · OtherCOMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER: $3,000 · OtherMASLOW PROJECT: $3,000 · Other+23 more: $24,430 · Other+23 moreKLAMATH-SISKIYOU WILDLANDS CENTER: $12,000 · EnvironmentKLAMATH-SISKIYOU W…THE GRAND CANYON TRUST INC: $4,500 · EnvironmentTHE GRAND CANYON T…Pesticide Action Network North America: $3,150 · EnvironmentPesticide Action N…RESOURCE RENEWAL INSTITUTE: $2,000 · EnvironmentRESOURCE RENEWAL I…+2 more: $1,250 · Environment+2 moreVOICES FOR CHILDREN: $15,000 · Civil RightsVOICES FOR C…NATIONAL DANCE INSTITUTE: $10,000 · Arts & CultureNATIONAL D…MENDOCINO MUSIC FESTIVAL: $3,250 · Arts & CultureMENDOCINO …SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $5,000 · Crime & LegalWilliams College: $3,000 · EducationPRESIDENT-BOARD OF TRUSTEES SANTA CLARA COLLEGE: $1,500 · EducationPUBLIC CITIZEN FOUNDATION INC: $4,000 · Public Benefit
Other$74,980Environment$22,900Civil Rights$15,000Arts & Culture$13,250Crime & Legal$5,000Education$4,500Public Benefit$4,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetVOICES FOR CHILDREN: $15,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetKLAMATH-SISKIYOU WILDLANDS CENTER: $12,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetNATIONAL DANCE INSTITUTE: $10,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $5,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GRAND CANYON TRUST INC: $4,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPUBLIC CITIZEN FOUNDATION INC: $4,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMENDOCINO MUSIC FESTIVAL: $3,250 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetMendocino Food and Nutrition Inc: $3,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPesticide Action Network North America: $3,150 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWilliams College: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMASLOW PROJECT: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK: $2,550 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetRESOURCE RENEWAL INSTITUTE: $2,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetSEEDS TO THE WORLD INC: $1,500 over 3y, 30% of budgetROGUE VALLEY FOOD SYSTEM NETWORK: $1,500 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetOUR FAMILY FARMS: $1,500 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetPRESIDENT-BOARD OF TRUSTEES SANTA CLARA COLLEGE: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetRANCHO COASTAL HUMANE SOCIETY: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHAPPY TRAILS RIDING ACADEMY: $1,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetHALLECK CREEK RANCH: $1,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBY THE BAY HEALTH: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMendocino Coast Botanical Gardens: $750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSchroon Lake Association: $750 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetNoyo Center For Marine Science: $750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMENDOCINO AREA PARKS ASSOCIATION: $750 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetPLANTING HOPE INTERNATIONAL: $600 over 3y, 2.6% of budgetROGUE FARM CORPS: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO FIRST TEE: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICARES FOUNDATION INC: $430 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds VOICES FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds KLAMATH-SISKIYOU WILDLANDS CENTER ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL DANCE INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE GRAND CANYON TRUST INC ↗
  • Who funds PUBLIC CITIZEN FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MENDOCINO MUSIC FESTIVAL ↗
  • Who funds Mendocino Food and Nutrition Inc ↗
  • Who funds Pesticide Action Network North America ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Williams College ↗
  • Who funds MASLOW PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds SAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds RESOURCE RENEWAL INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds SEEDS TO THE WORLD INC ↗
  • Who funds ROGUE VALLEY FOOD SYSTEM NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds OUR FAMILY FARMS ↗
  • Who funds PRESIDENT-BOARD OF TRUSTEES SANTA CLARA COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds RANCHO COASTAL HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds HAPPY TRAILS RIDING ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds HALLECK CREEK RANCH ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds FOUNDATION OF THE MASSACHUSETTS EYE AND EAR INFIRMARY INC ↗
  • Who funds BY THE BAY HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds Mendocino Coast Botanical Gardens ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of Mendocino CountyCA15.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Mendocino County · Tarbell Family Foundation · The Carpenter Foundation · Meyer Memorial Trust · Marin Community Foundation · The Bessemer Giving Fund · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Endowment Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Gag Charitable Corporation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Gag Charitable Corporation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 22%
  • Rogue Farm Corps: 91% of income from government
  • Maslow Project: 22% of income from government
  • Americares Foundation Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Williams College: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Gag Charitable Corporation?

Find your warmest path to Gag Charitable Corporation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 50 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Gag’s filings →

More from the funding graph