Skip to content

· Private foundation

Gad and Marlene Janay Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$661k
Granted FY2024still arriving
37
Grants FY2024still arriving
11
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$1.1MInternational$1.0MReligion$417kPublic Benefit$193kHuman Services$179kEducation$152kCivil Rights$150kHealth$134kOther$0
02FY2024 · 37 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k10 grants · $29k
  • $10k–50k23 grants · $370k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $262k
$15,000
Median grant
11
States reached
$8.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
American Israel Education Foundation$100,000
Jewish Federation of South Palm Beach County$60,000
BROTHERS FOR LIFE$51,500
Jewish Federation of Greater Metrowest NJ$50,000
Chabad of East Boca Raton$30,000
The Washington Institute for Near East Policy$25,000
Institute for Justice$20,000
American Enterprise Institute$20,000
PJTN$20,000
Individual grant recipient$20,000
BOCA RATON REGIONAL HOSPITAL$20,000
Cato Institute$20,000
Judicial Watch$20,000
American Jewish Committee$20,000
Foundation for Defense of Democracies$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $75k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 60% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%HOPE CENTER AT PULLEN INC: $10k → 8%Friends of Yashar LaChayal: $360 → 8%Hope Center at Pullen: $5k → 8%HOPE CENTER AT PULLEN INC: $5k → 8%Hope Center at Pullen: $5k → 8%HOPE CENTER AT PULLEN INC: $5k → 8%American Friends of Beit Issie Shapiro: $10k → 17%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF BEIT ISSIE SHAPIRO: $5k → 17%American Friends of Beit Issie Shapiro: $5k → 17%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF BEIT ISSIE SHAPIRO: $5k → 17%American Friends of Beit Issie Shapiro: $5k → 17%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF BEIT ISSIE SHAPIRO: $5k → 17%American Friends of Beit Issie Shapiro: $5k → 17%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF BEIT ISSIE SHAPIRO: $5k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
WI
NY
OH
NJ
CA
VA
TN
NC
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.6M · 46 repeat orgs$186k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +43% since the first grant, against +35% for those funded once.

46 repeat relationships: 26 still active in FY2024, 20 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

46
20

Total granted

$2.6M
$76k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
+35%

Still filing today

65%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $111k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHealthInternationalArts & CulturePublic BenefitHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WI
    WASHINGTON INSTITUTE FOR NEAR EAST POLICY
    8× · 2017–2024 · $110k · revenue +51%
  • CI
    CATO INSTITUTE
    8× · 2017–2024 · $108k · revenue +70%
  • AE
    AMERICAN ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH
    8× · 2017–2024 · $100k · revenue +0%

Funded once

  • TC
    Tivka Children's Home
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $6k
  • TX
    The X for Boys life
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

—
2
The Israel Innovation Fund Inc

Our vision is to reignite the zionist spirit and meet the needs of jewish civilization in the twenty-first century by connecting people around the world through the vibrancy and creativity of contemporary israeli culture.

Arts & Culture
3
American Israel Public Affairs Committee

To strengthen and expand the u.s.-israel relationship in ways that enhance the security of the united states and israel.

International
4
The Israel Institute Inc

The israel institute, inc. (the institute) enhances knowledge about modern israel by ensuring that more students have access to courses about israel during their time on campus.

International
5
The Shalom Hartman Institute of North America

The shalom hartman institute (shi) is a leading research and educational center serving israel and world jewry. we work to enrich the moral and spiritual life of israel and the jewish people, deepen the commitment to pluralism and israel's…

International
6
American Friends of Hebrew University Inc

Support the hebrew univ. of jerusalem, israel's foremost center of higher edu. & research.

International
7
Jewish Voice Ministries Intl

To proclaim the gospel, grow the messianic jewish community and engage the church concerning israel and the jewish people. this is done through education, evangelism and being a movement leader, all with excellence in order to transform…

—
8
American Friends of Torah and Tefilah Ramat Eshkol Inc

To promote and support jewish religious charitable and educational activities in israel & usa.

Religion
9
One for Israel

One for israel's purposes are to unite u.s. and international churches, ministries and individuals for the proclamation of the gospel in israel, to raise funds for evangelism and gospel proclamation, to provide tangible relief for israel's…

—
10
Jewish Electorate Institute

The jewish electorate institute (jei) is an independent, non-partisan 501(c)(3) organization that surveys, interprets, reports, and educates the public about the perspectives, voting behaviors, and motivations of the american jewish…

Civil Rights
11
Foundation for Jewish Philanthropies Inc

See schedule othe organization is a not-for-profit, public charity established in 1911 to provide for the quality and continuity of jewish life in western new york and around the world through private philanthropy. the foundation seeks,…

Philanthropy
12
Weizmann Institute of Science

The weizmann institute of science, located in rehovot, israel, is one of the worlds top-ranking, multidisciplinary research institutions. at any one time, several thousand scientists, staff and students are involved in hundreds of research…

Science & Tech
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Federation of Greater Metrowest Nj; the most unlike its peers is Duke School. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

47 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 47 of the 79 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
45/47
Grantees still filing
33/47
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JEWISH FEDERATION OF SOUTH PALM BEACH COUNTY INC: $500,400 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATION OF SOUTH …JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER METROWEST NJ: $371,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATE…BOYS TOWN JERUSALEM FOUNDATION OF AMERICA: $40,000 · Philanthropy+2 more: $12,000 · PhilanthropyTemple Beth El: $110,000 · OtherTemple Beth ElDUKE SCHOOL: $80,000 · OtherDUKE SCHOOLCHABAD OF EAST BOCA INC: $68,000 · OtherCHABAD OF EAST BOCA INCDAVID HOROWITZ FREEDOM CENTER: $60,000 · OtherBETH EL SYNAGOGUE: $60,000 · OtherCONGREGATION BNAI JESHURUN: $60,000 · OtherDURHAM-CHAPEL HILL JEWISH FEDERATION: $59,500 · OtherJUDEA REFORM CONGREGATION: $50,000 · OtherPJTN: $50,000 · OtherJEWISH FEDERATION OF DURHAM-CHAPEL: $43,500 · OtherAMERICAN ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH: $100,000 · OtherAMERICAN ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE FOR PUB…Brothers for Life: $51,500 · OtherAMERICAN FRIENDS OF BEIT ISSIE SHAPIRO INC: $45,000 · OtherBoca Raton Regional Hospital Inc: $50,000 · Other+41 more: $355,798 · Other+41 moreAMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $625,000 · InternationalAMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION F…WASHINGTON INSTITUTE FOR NEAR EAST POLICY: $110,200 · InternationalWASHINGTON INSTITUTE FOR NE…Foundation for the Defense of Democracies Inc: $82,000 · InternationalFoundation for the Defense …AMERICAN FRIENDS OF ORR SHALOM INC: $45,000 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF NATAL INC: $44,000 · InternationalTIKVA CORP: $75,000 · EducationChildren First Inc: $35,000 · EducationPRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $30,000 · EducationPROCLAIMING JUSTICE TO THE NATIONS INC: $27,000 · EducationDURHAM ACADEMY INC: $15,000 · EducationKIPP CHARLOTTE INC: $10,000 · Education+1 more: $5,000 · EducationCATO INSTITUTE: $108,000 · Public BenefitJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $85,000 · Public Benefit+1 more: $1,500 · Public BenefitINSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE: $90,000 · Civil RightsAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $84,500 · Civil RightsWOODSON CENTER: $75,000 · Community ImprovementBoca Raton Regional Hospital Foundation Inc: $55,000 · Community Improvement
Philanthropy$923,400Other$1,243,298International$906,200Education$197,000Public Benefit$194,500Civil Rights$174,500Community Improvement$130,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $625,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF SOUTH PALM BEACH COUNTY INC: $500,400 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER METROWEST NJ: $371,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetWASHINGTON INSTITUTE FOR NEAR EAST POLICY: $110,200 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetCATO INSTITUTE: $108,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH: $100,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE: $90,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $85,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $84,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetFoundation for the Defense of Democracies Inc: $82,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetDUKE SCHOOL: $80,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetWOODSON CENTER: $75,000 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetTIKVA CORP: $75,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetDAVID HOROWITZ FREEDOM CENTER: $60,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetDURHAM-CHAPEL HILL JEWISH FEDERATION: $59,500 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetBoca Raton Regional Hospital Foundation Inc: $55,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetBrothers for Life: $51,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBoca Raton Regional Hospital Inc: $50,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF ORR SHALOM INC: $45,000 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF BEIT ISSIE SHAPIRO INC: $45,000 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF NATAL INC: $44,000 over 8y, 1.0% of budgetBOYS TOWN JERUSALEM FOUNDATION OF AMERICA: $40,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetUS ISRAEL EDUCATION FUND INC: $36,000 over 3y, 89% of budgetChildren First Inc: $35,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetPRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HOPE CENTER AT PULLEN INC: $30,000 over 5y, 1.7% of budgetPROCLAIMING JUSTICE TO THE NATIONS INC: $27,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetREBOUND ALTERNATIVES FOR YOUTH: $15,000 over 3y, 4.7% of budgetDURHAM ACADEMY INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NORTH CAROLINA CHILDREN'S MUSEUM: $12,500 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetREUT USA: $12,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKIPP CHARLOTTE INC: $10,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHelping Israel Fund: $10,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetBOOK HARVEST: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMILLBURN SHORT HILLS VOLUNTEER FIRST AID SQUAD INC: $2,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetMILLBURN EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetDIABETES FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCLARION PROJECT INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE HIGHLAND BEACH POLICE AND FIRE FOUNDATION INC: $1,500 over 2y, 3.8% of budgetPILOTS TO THE RESCUE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFriends of Yashar L'Chayal Inc: $360 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF SOUTH PALM BEACH COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER METROWEST NJ ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON INSTITUTE FOR NEAR EAST POLICY ↗
  • Who funds CATO INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH ↗
  • Who funds INSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE ↗
  • Who funds JUDICIAL WATCH INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE ↗
  • Who funds Foundation for the Defense of Democracies Inc ↗
  • Who funds DUKE SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds WOODSON CENTER ↗
  • Who funds TIKVA CORP ↗
  • Who funds DAVID HOROWITZ FREEDOM CENTER ↗
  • Who funds DURHAM-CHAPEL HILL JEWISH FEDERATION ↗
  • Who funds Boca Raton Regional Hospital Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds Brothers for Life ↗
  • Who funds Boca Raton Regional Hospital Inc ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF ORR SHALOM INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF BEIT ISSIE SHAPIRO INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF NATAL INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS TOWN JERUSALEM FOUNDATION OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds US ISRAEL EDUCATION FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds Children First Inc ↗
  • Who funds PRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE HOPE CENTER AT PULLEN INC ↗
  • Who funds PROCLAIMING JUSTICE TO THE NATIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds REBOUND ALTERNATIVES FOR YOUTH ↗
  • Who funds DURHAM ACADEMY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY21.4× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Triangle Community Foundation Inc · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Jewish Community Foundation of Greater Metrowest NJ · The Healthcare Foundation of New Jersey Inc · Jewish National Fund (Keren Kayemeth Leisrael) Inc · Duke Energy Foundation · Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago · Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Gad and Marlene Janay Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Gad and Marlene Janay Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 100%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 31%
  • Children First Inc: 100% of income from government
  • Diabetes Foundation Inc: 31% of income from government
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
10get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 79 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $111k of grant expense with no grantee named in the published copy. A private foundation itemizes every grant it makes, so a return carrying none has filed its list as an attachment that the public copy does not include. The figures above are therefore from FY2024, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Gad and Marlene Janay’s filings →

More from the funding graph