Skip to content
Fuzehub Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Fuzehub Inc

Fuzehub works to better connect new york's small and mid-sized manufacturing companies to the resources, programs and expertise they need for technology commercialization, innovative solutions and business growth.

$1.7M
Granted FY2024still arriving
45
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$115k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Science & Tech$5.2MEducation$1.7MHealth$764kCommunity Improvement$617kEnvironment$346kEmployment$205kSocial Science$194kFood & Nutrition$37kOther$0
02FY2024 · 45 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $29k
  • $10k–50k30 grants · $771k
  • $50k–250k11 grants · $872k
$30,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$4.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CENTRAL NEW YORK TECH$115,000
CORNELL UNIVERSITY$97,315
UNIVERSITY OF BUFFALO$93,214
UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER$87,840
BINGHAMTON UNIVERSITY$79,311
UNIVERSITY OF ALBANY (RESEARCH FOUNDATION STATE UNIV NY)$78,930
ROCHESTER INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY$72,406
DOWNSTATE TECH CTR$67,859
TECH VALLEY CTR GRAVITY (UNCAGED INNOVATIONS)$61,313
SOUTH TIER HIGH TECH INCUBATOR$60,000
ITAC (NYC INDUSTRIAL & TECH)(COHESIVE ROBOTICS)$58,453
SUNY COLLEGE MEDICINE (RESEARCH FOUNDATION STATE UNIV NY)$45,000
CITEC (STRUCTURAL BIOCOMPOSITES)$41,002
ANDIEM$40,000
ASHLAWN ENERGY$40,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 94% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%FARM TO FLAME ENERGY: $135k → 11%LEVELLE: $50k → 9%RENSSELAER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE: $425k → 11%ALFRED TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES: $75k → 13%NORWHEY: $70k → 13%ROCHESTER INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $104k → 14%HUDSON VALLEY TEXTILE: $75k → 14%CORNELL UNIVERSITY: $181k → 16%ITAC (NYC INDUSTRIAL & TECH)(COHESIVE ROBOTICS): $58k → 17%ALFRED UNIVERSITY: $61k → 19%SOUTH TIER HIGH TECH INCUBATOR: $90k → 20%SPIRO DEVICES LLC: $103k → 20%ASHLAWN ENERGY: $100k → 7%RENSSELAER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE: $117k → 11%ROCHESTER INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY FUND: $73k → 14%HALOMINE INC: $50k → 16%ALFRED UNIVERSITY: $53k → 19%BINGHAMTON UNIVERSITY: $89k → 20%RENSSELAER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE: $70k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF BUFFALO: $132k → 13%CNY BIOTECH: $50k → 14%ROCHESTER INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $72k → 14%BINGHAMTON UNIVERSITY: $79k → 20%MECHANISMIC INC: $50k → 7%TECH VALLEY CTR GRAVITY (UNCAGED INNOVATIONS): $61k → 11%ROCHESTER INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY FUND: $52k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF ALBANY (RESEARCH FOUNDATION STATE UNIV NY): $79k → 14%CLARKSON UNIVERSITY: $99k → 18%SOUTH TIER HIGH TECH INCUBATOR: $60k → 20%RENSSELAER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE: $56k → 11%CLARKSON UNIVERSITY: $98k → 18%DEL TOCORORO LLC: $50k → 16%CLARKSON UNIVERSITY: $56k → 18%CAPRO-X INC: $50k → 16%CLARKSON UNIVERSITY: $52k → 18%DOWNSTATE TECH CTR: $68k → 20%CENTRAL NEW YORK TECH: $115k → 14%RE-NUBLE INC: $139k → 17%CATHBUDDY INC: $50k → 17%SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY: $50k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER: $122k → 14%ARSENAL BUSINESS & TECHNOLOGY PARTNERSHIP: $50k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER: $91k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER: $88k → 14%PRECISION VALVE & AUTOMATION INC: $103k → 14%RESEARCH FOUNDATION OF CITY UNIVERSITY NY: $164k → 17%UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER: $72k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER: $58k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$6.9M · 48 repeat orgs$2.2M to everyone else

48 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2024, 30 since wound down; 21 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

48
53

Total granted

$6.9M
$1.6M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
+49%

Still filing today

46%
9%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 66% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $562k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationCommunity ImprovementSocial ScienceHealthEmploymentArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TR
    The Research Foundation for The State University of New York
    8× · 2017–2024 · $1.1M · revenue +62%
  • Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
    7× · 2017–2024 · $756k · revenue +25%
  • UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER
    8× · 2017–2024 · $508k · revenue +81%

Funded once

  • SD
    SPIRO DEVICES LLC
    one grant, 2020 · $103k
  • PV
    PRECISION VALVE & AUTOMATION INC
    one grant, 2020 · $103k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $100k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York Center for Research Economic Advancement Technology Engineeringand

The new york center for research, economic advancement, technology, engineering and science corporation (ny creates) formed for the purpose of advancing scientific research, education and economic development within new york state.…

Science & Tech
2
Excell Partners Inc

The company's mission is to provide financial support, education, management support and networking connections to technology-based start-up companies emerging from the communities, universities, and research centers across upstate new…

Community Improvement
3
Rit Global Delivery Corporation

Provide administrative and other support services to academic programs sponsored by rochester institute of technology both in the united states and abroad.

Education
4
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
5
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
6
Ie New York College

(see schedule o)

Education
7
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
8
The Graduate Center Foundation Inc

The graduate center foundation is committed to promoting and safe-guarding the success of the graduate center by raising funds and managing and investing donations for use by the graduate center. the board of trustees of the foundation…

—
9
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
10
Ceg of the Capital Region

Accelerate economic opportunity in albany/ny's capital region by developing and implementing strategies to attract, expand, and create businesses and jobs, and provide catalytic leadership, working with partners and stakeholders to shape a…

Membership Benefit
11
Stony Brook Ophthalmology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
12
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Downstate Technology Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is Hudson Valley Technology Development Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

33 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 33 of the 123 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
32/33
Grantees still filing
21/33
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

The Research Foundation for The State University of New York: $1,129,447 · EducationThe Research Foundation for The State University of New…Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute: $756,039 · EducationRensselaer Polytechnic InstituteUNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER: $507,536 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTERRochester Institute of Technology: $428,724 · EducationRochester Institute of TechnologyCornell University: $398,302 · EducationCornell UniversityCLARKSON UNIVERSITY: $346,066 · EducationCLARKSON UNIVERSITYResearch Foundation of the City University of New York: $229,746 · EducationALFRED UNIVERSITY: $190,618 · EducationTECH VALLEY CENTER OF GRAVITY INC: $180,910 · Education+6 more: $262,733 · Education+6 moreRE-NUBLE INC: $159,898 · OtherFARM TO FLAME ENERGY INC: $150,000 · Other+95 more: $3,620,224 · Other+95 moreCENTER FOR ECONOMIC GROWTH INC: $194,099 · Social ScienceNEXTCORPS INC: $123,000 · Social ScienceALFRED TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES INC: $75,000 · Community ImprovementDOWNSTATE TECHNOLOGY CENTER INC: $67,859 · Community ImprovementBROOKLYN NAVY YARD DEVELOPMENT CORP: $50,000 · Community ImprovementLONG ISLAND HIGH TECHNOLOGY INCUBATOR INC: $50,000 · Community ImprovementQUEENS ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $23,420 · Community ImprovementNYSARC INC MONROE COUNTY CHAPTER: $50,000 · HealthREGENERATIVE RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $49,986 · HealthALLIANCE FOR MANUFACTURING AND TECHNOLOGY OF THE SOUTHERN TIER INC: $43,964 · EmploymentTHE CENTER FOR ARCHITECTURE INC: $10,044 · Arts & Culture
Education$4,430,121Other$3,930,122Social Science$317,099Community Improvement$266,279Health$99,986Employment$43,964Arts & Culture$10,044

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe Research Foundation for The State University of New York: $1,129,447 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetRensselaer Polytechnic Institute: $756,039 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER: $507,536 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetRochester Institute of Technology: $428,724 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCornell University: $398,302 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCLARKSON UNIVERSITY: $346,066 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetResearch Foundation of the City University of New York: $229,746 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR ECONOMIC GROWTH INC: $194,099 over 7y, 3.5% of budgetALFRED UNIVERSITY: $190,618 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTECH VALLEY CENTER OF GRAVITY INC: $180,910 over 6y, 13% of budgetCENTRAL NEW YORK TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION INC: $129,000 over 3y, 5.4% of budgetNEXTCORPS INC: $123,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetHUDSON VALLEY TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC: $121,694 over 6y, 3.1% of budgetNew York City Industrial Technology Assistance Corporation: $106,000 over 3y, 3.2% of budgetALFRED TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES INC: $75,000 over 1y, 5.9% of budgetDOWNSTATE TECHNOLOGY CENTER INC: $67,859 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetMOZAIC CHAPTER NYSARC INC: $65,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCITEC INC: $60,000 over 2y, 3.8% of budgetSOUTHERN TIER HIGH TECHNOLOGY INCUBATOR INC: $60,000 over 1y, 6.2% of budgetCANISIUS UNIVERSITY: $54,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNYSARC INC MONROE COUNTY CHAPTER: $50,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetThe Arsenal Business & Technology Partnership LTD: $50,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetBROOKLYN NAVY YARD DEVELOPMENT CORP: $50,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT GROWTH ENTERPRISES CORPORATION: $50,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetLONG ISLAND HIGH TECHNOLOGY INCUBATOR INC: $50,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetSYRACUSE UNIVERSITY: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetREGENERATIVE RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $49,986 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetALLIANCE FOR MANUFACTURING AND TECHNOLOGY OF THE SOUTHERN TIER INC: $43,964 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $31,777 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSCHENECTADY COUNTY CHAPTER NYSARC INC: $19,995 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR ARCHITECTURE INC: $10,044 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI: $6,956 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds The Research Foundation for The State University of New York ↗
  • Who funds Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER ↗
  • Who funds Rochester Institute of Technology ↗
  • Who funds Cornell University ↗
  • Who funds CLARKSON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Research Foundation of the City University of New York ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR ECONOMIC GROWTH INC ↗
  • Who funds ALFRED UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds TECH VALLEY CENTER OF GRAVITY INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL NEW YORK TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION INC ↗
  • Who funds NEXTCORPS INC ↗
  • Who funds HUDSON VALLEY TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds New York City Industrial Technology Assistance Corporation ↗
  • Who funds ALFRED TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES INC ↗
  • Who funds DOWNSTATE TECHNOLOGY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds MOZAIC CHAPTER NYSARC INC ↗
  • Who funds CITEC INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN TIER HIGH TECHNOLOGY INCUBATOR INC ↗
  • Who funds CANISIUS UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds NYSARC INC MONROE COUNTY CHAPTER ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

New York City Industr…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
New York City Industrial Technology Assistance CorporationNY17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: New York City Industrial Technology Assistance Corporation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Fuzehub Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Fuzehub Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Fuzehub Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Fuzehub Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 123 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Fuzehub’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home