· Public charity
New York City Industrial Technology Assistance Corporation
To strengthen the economy and job base of new york city by improving the competitiveness of local industrial and technology firms.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 74% of New York City Industrial Technology Assistance Corporation’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 5 grants below total $117,690 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $125,151 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $7,461 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k1 grant · $8k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $44k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $65k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NY Embroidery Studio | $65,000 |
| GAL Manufacturing Company LLC | $20,000 |
| Tempco Glass Fabrication LLC | $14,450 |
| Yula Corp | $10,000 |
| Arbour Group LLC | $8,240 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY21–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 95% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
3 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 64% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $43k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- NYNEW YORK EMBROIDERY STUDEO2× · 2022–2025 · $75k
- NINEXTCORPS INC2× · 2021–2022 · $43k · revenue -3%
- YCYula Corp2× · 2022–2025 · $20k
Funded once
- CRCohesive Roboticsone grant, 2024 · $48k
- PTPVILION TECHNOLOGIES LLCone grant, 2024 · $25k
- TRThe Research Foundation for The State University of New Yorkgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $20k · revenue +36%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Accelerate economic opportunity in albany/ny's capital region by developing and implementing strategies to attract, expand, and create businesses and jobs, and provide catalytic leadership, working with partners and stakeholders to shape a…
To stimulate economic development in the southern tier region of ny, through support of the creation of innovative business start-ups and the jobs they create. this support is provided through its business incubator facilities and the…
Nystec is a not-for-profit technology consulting company, advising organizations, agencies, institutions, and businesses. nystec's mission is to provide superior consulting services to assist state and government clients in successfully…
Fuzehub works to better connect new york's small and mid-sized manufacturing companies to the resources, programs and expertise they need for technology commercialization, innovative solutions and business growth.
To bring businesses, job seekers and training providers together to provide skilled workers for every business and employment for every job seeker.
To strengthen the economy and job base of new york city by improving the competitiveness of local industrial and technology firms.
To document and present in context the inventions and industrial innovations of New York's Southern Tier.
The mission of the organization is to facilitate the long term success of manufacturers in new york state. the association advocates a favorable business climate in new york state and provides professional services to enhance the success…
Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.
The new york center for research, economic advancement, technology, engineering and science corporation (ny creates) formed for the purpose of advancing scientific research, education and economic development within new york state.…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Center for Economic Growth Inc and the most unlike its peers is Central Association for the Blind Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds NEXTCORPS INC ↗
- Who funds The Research Foundation for The State University of New York ↗
- Who funds WESTERN NEW YORK TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds CITEC INC ↗
- Who funds CENTRAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE BLIND INC ↗
- Who funds CENTRAL NEW YORK TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION INC ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR ECONOMIC GROWTH INC ↗
- Who funds ALLIANCE FOR MANUFACTURING AND TECHNOLOGY OF THE SOUTHERN TIER INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.
Open a dossier: Fuzehub Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization New York City Industrial Technology Assistance Corporation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to New York City Industrial Technology Assistance Corporation?
Find your warmest path to New York City Industrial Technology Assistance Corporation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.