Skip to content
Plinth
← FundingAlso makes grants — grantmaker profile →

New York · Nonprofit

New York City Industrial Technology Assistance Corporation

New York City Industrial Technology Assistance Corporation (New York) receives grants from 2 organizations whose IRS filings report $445,374 to it, the largest being Oregon Manufacturing Extension Partnership Inc ($339,374). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.

$2.0M
Revenue FY2025
2
Funders on record
$445k
Grants received
$2.2M
Net assets
2/2 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 7%

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($2.5M) Expenses 100 ($2.2M) Net assets 100 ($887k)2018 Revenue 118 ($2.9M) Expenses 120 ($2.6M) Net assets 142 ($1.3M)2019 Revenue 131 ($3.3M) Expenses 129 ($2.8M) Net assets 197 ($1.7M)2020 Revenue 108 ($2.7M) Expenses 125 ($2.8M) Net assets 260 ($2.3M)2021 Revenue 138 ($3.5M) Expenses 134 ($2.9M) Net assets 264 ($2.3M)2022 Revenue 124 ($3.1M) Expenses 134 ($2.9M) Net assets 293 ($2.6M)2023 Revenue 93 ($2.3M) Expenses 120 ($2.6M) Net assets 254 ($2.3M)2024 Revenue 74 ($1.8M) Expenses 89 ($2.0M) Net assets 255 ($2.3M)2025 Revenue 79 ($2.0M) Expenses 91 ($2.0M) Net assets 243 ($2.2M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (79)Expenses (91)Net assets (243)

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 57% · 2018 52% · 2019 58% · 2020 50% · 2021 53% · 2022 61% · 2023 57% · 2024 67% · 2025 63%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 4 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

$299k
17
$316k
18
$431k
19
$72k
20
$502k
21
$152k
22
$320k
23
$126k
24
$26k
25
1.9
months of
reserve
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2018 → 2023: the base held at 1 funder, grant income fell $51k → $38k.

Funder
'18
'19
'20
'23
'24*
total
Fuzehub Incunclassified
$106k
funders
1
1
2
1
1

From the IRS filings of New York City Industrial Technology Assistance Corporation’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

New York City Industrial Technology Assistance Corporation leans on a few funders — its largest provides 76% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

100% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund New York City Industrial Technology Assistance Corporation.

76%
largest funder
100%
top three
~2
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2018 100% · 2019 100% · 2020 94% · 2023 100%broadly stable.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

New York City Industrial Technology Assistance Corporation draws 76% of its grant income from funders outside New York, across 2 states in all.

NY
OR

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

18
19
20
23
New York out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Organizations like New York City Industrial Technology Assistance Corporation

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In New York

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

88% of spending goes to programs.

Program 88%Management 12%Fundraising 0%

Governance

10
board members
100%
independent
Conflict-of-interest policyWhistleblower policyDocument retentionBoard reviewed the 990Audited financials

Public support

96%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

NY

Part of a family of 1 related entity

  • Manufacturers Services Inc · corp_trust

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for New York City Industrial Technology Assistance Corporation: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds New York City Industrial Technology Assistance Corporation?
New York City Industrial Technology Assistance Corporation (New York) receives grants from 2 organizations whose IRS filings report $445,374 to it, the largest being Oregon Manufacturing Extension Partnership Inc ($339,374). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does New York City Industrial Technology Assistance Corporation have?
IRS filings report 2 organizations giving $445,374 in grants to New York City Industrial Technology Assistance Corporation, 2 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of New York City Industrial Technology Assistance Corporation?
Oregon Manufacturing Extension Partnership Inc is the largest funder on record, with $339,374 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like New York City Industrial Technology Assistance Corporation find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in New York. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 2funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing