Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Furnanz Marrazzo Family Foundation

Its FY2023 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$85k
Granted FY2023
4
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What you fund
0193% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20212023.

Human Services$135kHealth$75kEducation$71kFood & Nutrition$25kRecreation & Sports$5kYouth Development$3kReligion$1kOther$0
02FY2023 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $80k
$25,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
YOUTH HOMES$30,000
ARCHBISHOP RIORDAN HIGH SCHOOL$25,000
CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY SCRAMENTO$25,000
LEND A HAND FOUNDATION$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–23, $120k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%YOUTH HOMES: $35k → 9%YOUTH HOMES: $33k → 9%YOUTH HOMES: $30k → 9%GRATEFUL GATHERINGS: $11k → 10%GRATEFUL GATHERINGS: $5k → 10%LEND A HAND FOUNDATION: $5k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

74%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$240k · 8 repeat orgs$82k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2023, 6 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
10

Total granted

$240k
$52k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
+59%

Still filing today

63%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 65% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $30k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23
Human ServicesHealthFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Homeless Prenatal Program Inc
    2× · 2021–2022 · $55k · revenue +10%
  • GG
    GRATEFUL GATHERINGS
    2× · 2021–2022 · $16k · revenue +74%
  • AE
    Alameda Emergency Food DBA Alameda Food Bank
    2× · 2021–2022 · $10k · revenue +29%

Funded once

  • SC
    SOUTH COUNTY COMMUNITY SERVICES fka ST JOSEPHS FAMILY CENTER
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue -4%
  • RH
    RIORDAN HIGH SCHOOL
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
  • ND
    NOTRE DAME
    one grant, 2021 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Homeless Childrens Network

To provide direct mental health services, psychotherapy, and counseling to homeless families in San Francisco, CA and in particular to children of such families, to provide referral services for such families and their children to other…

Human Services
2
Alameda Family Services Inc

Nonprofit human services organization active in the City of Alameda and the East Bay whose mission is to improve the emotional, psychological, and physical health of children, youth, and their families.

Human Services
3
Consejo Counseling & Referral Service

Consejo brings healing, health, and hope to communities through holistic, culturally, and linguistically competent behavioral health services and advocacy.

Health
4
Wellnest Emotional Health & Wellness

Through a holistic approach to emotional well-being, Wellnest offers hope, healing, and opportunity to the children, young adults, families, and communities we serve. Our commitment remains steadfast as we enter our second century of…

Human Services
5
Bayview Hunters Point for Community Improvement

Provide support services for the community relating to mental health, substance abuse, youth services & violence prevention.

6
Bay Area Community Services Inc

BACS' mission is to uplift under-served individuals and their families by doing "whatever it takes." BACS helps people experiencing homelessness, housing insecurity, or behavioural health challenges while balancing other complications like…

7
The Children's Clinic 'Serving Children and Their Families'

TCC Family Health mission is to provide innovative, integrated, quality health care that will contribute to a healthy community, focusing on those in need and working with patients and the community as partners in their overall well-being.

8
Community Human Services Corporation

Chs empowers individuals and families to live in stable housing, connect to community resources, build relationships and access quality food.

Human Services
9
Allies for Every Child Inc

All children need a childhood. Allies for Every Child brings together and strengthens families, cultivating conditions for children to succeed in life. (Continues on Schedule O)

Human Services
10
Youth for Change

Youth For Change (YFC) mission is to enhance the well being of children, families, individuals, and communities.

Human Services
11
Hands of Hope Resources for Homeless Families

Hands of Hope works to enhance the quality of life in the Yuba-Sutter area by: Providing core support services to the homeless; Reintegrating the homeless within our community; Engaging the community to respond to the challenge of…

Housing & Shelter
12
The San Francisco Particular Council of the Society of St Vincent De Paul

The mission of the st. vincent de paul society of san francisco (svdp-sf) is to offer hope and service on a direct person-to-person basis, working to break the cycles of homelessness and domestic violence.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Grateful Gatherings and the most unlike its peers is Alameda Emergency Food Dba Alameda Food Bank. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ARCHBISHOP RIORDAN HIGH SCHOOL — $35,000 · OtherARCHBISHOP RIORDAN HIGH SCHOOLCALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY SCRAMENTO — $25,000 · OtherCALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY SCRAMENTOAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY — $10,275 · OtherAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETYRIORDAN HIGH SCHOOL — $10,000 · OtherRIORDAN HIGH SCHOOLCOMMUNITY SOLUTIONS FOR CHILDREN FAMILIES AND INDIVIDUALS — $10,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY SOLUTIONS FOR CHILDREN FAMILIES A…NOTRE DAME — $5,000 · OtherLOVED TWICE — $5,000 · OtherNAMINATIONAL ALLIANCE ON MENTAL ILLNESS — $5,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $5,000 · OtherALAMEDA EMERGENCY FUND — $5,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $5,000 · Other+2 more — $2,083 · OtherYouth Homes Inc — $98,680 · Human ServicesYouth Homes IncGRATEFUL GATHERINGS — $15,839 · Human ServicesGRATEFUL GATHERINGSLEND A HAND FOUNDATION — $5,000 · Human ServicesHomeless Prenatal Program Inc — $55,000 · HealthHomeless Prenatal Pro…ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $5,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RE…SOUTH COUNTY COMMUNITY SERVICES fka ST JOSEPHS FAMILY CENTER — $10,000 · Food & NutritionAlameda Emergency Food DBA Alameda Food Bank — $10,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$122,358Human Services$119,519Health$60,000Food & Nutrition$20,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetYouth Homes Inc — $98,680 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetHomeless Prenatal Program Inc — $55,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetGRATEFUL GATHERINGS — $15,839 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetSOUTH COUNTY COMMUNITY SERVICES fka ST JOSEPHS FAMILY CENTER — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAlameda Emergency Food DBA Alameda Food Bank — $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY SOLUTIONS FOR CHILDREN FAMILIES AND INDIVIDUALS — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Youth Homes Inc
  • Who funds Homeless Prenatal Program Inc
  • Who funds GRATEFUL GATHERINGS
  • Who funds SOUTH COUNTY COMMUNITY SERVICES fka ST JOSEPHS FAMILY CENTER
  • Who funds Alameda Emergency Food DBA Alameda Food Bank
  • Who funds COMMUNITY SOLUTIONS FOR CHILDREN FAMILIES AND INDIVIDUALS
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
  • Who funds LEND A HAND FOUNDATION

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Heffernan Group FoundationCA13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Heffernan Group Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Furnanz Marrazzo Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Furnanz Marrazzo Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Furnanz Marrazzo Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph