Loading…
Loading…
· Public charity
Invest in the leadership and sustainability of organizations working to advance gender justice ecenomic oportunity and health equity for women girls and gender-fluid people in Puerto Rico
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2021–2025.
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +223% since the first grant, against +66% for the ones you funded once.
3 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 43% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $247k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Provide support to woman victims of domestic violence and abuse. Assist woman interested in developing and expanding their education coordinate aid and services to low income woman with public agencies non profit and private organization.
To support the development and self-sufficiency of Puerto Rico women by offering them housing alternatives and education so they can surpass violence situations and gender discrimination and exert their right to a life free of violence and…
Provide the development of women and girls through activities of economic and social empowerment, development of human capital, business activity and entrepreneurial capacity.
Promoting social justice and supporting the economic security, safety, health, reproductive autonomy and general empowerment of women, girls and gender-fluid individuals in Puerto Rico
Provide special services to women and their families, victims, and/or survivors of domestic violence, stalking and sexual assault.
supporting vulnerable immigrant women through education, resources and advocacy
Development activities, projects of housing and socioeconomic development to assist low and moderate income comunities in puerto rico.
The corporation was incorporated since 1968 by the religious community of Daughthers of Charity. The Purpose was to provided help to poor familes that have been affected by domestic violence by professionals Counsulting in this campus and…
The principal objective is to facilitate health treatment, education, and prevention services to socially marginal sectors such as homeless, drug addict, sex-worker, and patient exposed to risk.
Use the arts as a tool for social well-being, solidarity, leadership and self-management through artistic presentations and community workshops on plastic arts and collective creation.
To teach entrepreneurship to people interested in starting businesses in Puerto Rico with the mission of improving local and country economy thru small businesses.
Educate and research anti-racist and decolonizing work inside and outside of Puerto Rico
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Casa Juana Colon Apoyo Y Orientacion a La Mujer Inc and the most unlike its peers is True Self Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Tides Center · Puerto Rico Community Foundation Inc · Juntos y Unidos por Puerto Rico Inc · Center for Popular Democracy Inc · Hispanic Federation Inc · Fondos Unidos de Puerto Rico Inc & United Way Puerto Rico · Para la Naturaleza Inc · Tides Foundation · Filantropia Puerto Rico Inc · Fundacion Puertorriquea de Las · Hispanics in Philanthropy · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Every dot is one organisation Fundacion De Mujeres En Puerto Rico funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Through Plinth
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: Casa Juana Colon Apoyo y.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
~4 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 3 filed years.
3 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 4.5× since.
US 501(c)(3); EIN 660645609 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on Casa Juana Colon Apoyo y, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
Find your warmest path to Fundacion De Mujeres En Puerto Rico through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.