Skip to content

· Private foundation

Fullwood Foundation Inc 6035-00-46

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$260k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$60k
Largest
01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$222kFood & Nutrition$155kYouth Development$152kArts & Culture$98kHousing & Shelter$71kRecreation & Sports$65kHuman Services$60kAnimals$48kOther$0
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $35k
  • $10k–50k12 grants · $165k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $60k
$10,500
Median grant
9
States reached
$3.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$60,000
Individual grant recipient$35,000
TALBOT INTERFAITH SHELTER$15,000
High Country Living$15,000
Chesapeake Bay Maritime Museum$15,000
Individual grant recipient$12,000
Individual grant recipient$12,000
Spread the Word Nevada$10,500
HORIZONS D C$10,500
Humane Animal Rescue of PGH$10,000
Arts In Reach - New Hampshire$10,000
ROW NEW YORK$10,000
Boston Partners in Education$10,000
Individual grant recipient$7,500
MV Community Early Childhood Program$7,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $60k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%High Country Living: $15k → 12%High Country Living: $15k → 12%High Country Living: $15k → 12%High Country Living: $8k → 12%THE FOOD DEPOT: $8k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
NY
MA
NV
PA
RI
CA
MD
NM
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$943k · 27 repeat orgs$148k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +34% since the first grant, against +13% for those funded once.

27 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
10

Total granted

$943k
$77k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+13%

Still filing today

37%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $71k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesFood & NutritionArts & CultureHousing & ShelterRecreation & SportsEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TI
    TALBOT INTERFAITH SHELTER INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $71k · revenue +148%
  • NC
    NORTH COUNTRY SCHOOL INC
    3× · 2020–2022 · $58k · revenue +159%
  • HC
    HIGH COUNTRY SUPPORTED LIVING
    4× · 2022–2025 · $53k · revenue +34%

Funded once

  • CM
    CHESAPEAKE MULTICULTURAL RESOURCE CENTER INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $15k · revenue +98%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
  • TF
    THE FOOD DEPOT
    one grant, 2020 · $9k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Capital Area Food Bank Inc

The mission of the capital area food bank (the food bank or cafb) is to help our neighbors thrive by creating more equitable access to food and opportunity through community partnerships.

Food & Nutrition
2
Freshfarm Markets

Freshfarm is a washington, dc-based nonprofit that builds a more equitable, sustainable, and resilient food system in the mid-atlantic region by producing innovative solutions in partnership with local communities and organizations. we…

Food & Nutrition
3
Manna Food Center Inc

Manna food center, inc strives to end hunger in our community through education, advocacy, and food distribution to individuals and partner agencies. manna's guiding principles are to be service-driven, community- centered and…

Food & Nutrition
4
Chester County Food Bank

We mobilize and educate our community to ensure equitable access to nutritious and familiar food. we do this by raising, and soliciting funds for the acquisition, storage, growing, collection and distribution of food to low income citizens…

Food & Nutrition
5
Arcadia Food Inc

Cultivate local food systems prioritizing health, equity, and sustainability, from farm forward.

Food & Nutrition
6
The Food Trust

The food trust (tft), a nonprofit founded in philadelphia in 1992, strives to make healthy food available to all.continued on schedule otft is a regional and national leader in developing new strategies to prevent childhood obesity and…

Food & Nutrition
7
Second Harvest Food Bank of Northwest Nc Inc

To provide food assistance through a network of partners, while educating and engaging our communities in the elimination of hunger and its causes.

Food & Nutrition
8
North Texas Food Bank

To close the hunger gap in north texas by working through over 500 feeding partners to provide access to nutritious food and address the root causes of hunger.

—
9
Ingenuity Prep

Ingenuity prep public charter school was formed to prepare students to succeed in college and beyond as impactful civiic leaders.

Education
10
Port Chester Carver Center Inc

Port chester carver center helps our community thrive through programs that nourish, educate, and empower.

Human Services
11
Healthy Chesapeake Inc

Healthy chesapeake is committed to building a culture of wellness that supports, sustains and advocates for a healthier chesapeake. to achieve this, healthy chesapeake recognizes that health and well-being are interconnected with social,…

Health
12
San Francisco Food Bank

To end hunger in san francisco and marin counties by soliciting food donations nationally, distributing this food to qualifying public service agencies and neighborhood pantries, advocating for improved government food programs, and…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Martha's Table Inc; the most unlike its peers is Talbot Interfaith Shelter Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
10/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $76,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $66,953 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $63,550 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $60,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientNORTH COUNTRY SCHOOL INC: $58,000 · OtherNORTH COUNTRY SCHOOL INCHumane Animal Rescue of PGH: $43,000 · OtherHumane Animal Rescue of PGHBOSTON PARTNERS IN EDUCATION INC: $42,500 · OtherBOSTON PARTNERS IN EDUCATION INCNM School for the Arts: $32,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $32,500 · OtherArts In Reach - New Hampshire: $30,000 · OtherHOPE FLOATS: $27,000 · Other+19 more: $231,731 · Other+19 moreCHESAPEAKE BAY MARITIME MUSEUM INC: $45,000 · Arts & CultureTHE WARD MELVILLE HERITAGE ORGANIZATION LTD: $38,000 · Arts & CultureTALBOT INTERFAITH SHELTER INC: $70,576 · Housing & ShelterHIGH COUNTRY SUPPORTED LIVING: $52,500 · Human ServicesTHE FOOD DEPOT: $7,500 · Human ServicesROW NEW YORK INC: $54,000 · Recreation & SportsSPREAD THE WORD NEVADA: $35,500 · Youth DevelopmentMARTHA'S TABLE INC: $16,500 · Food & NutritionTHREE SQUARE: $7,500 · Food & Nutrition
Other$763,734Arts & Culture$83,000Housing & Shelter$70,576Human Services$60,000Recreation & Sports$54,000Youth Development$35,500Food & Nutrition$24,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTALBOT INTERFAITH SHELTER INC: $70,576 over 6y, 1.8% of budgetNORTH COUNTRY SCHOOL INC: $58,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetROW NEW YORK INC: $54,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetHIGH COUNTRY SUPPORTED LIVING: $52,500 over 4y, 17% of budgetCHESAPEAKE BAY MARITIME MUSEUM INC: $45,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetBOSTON PARTNERS IN EDUCATION INC: $42,500 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetTHE WARD MELVILLE HERITAGE ORGANIZATION LTD: $38,000 over 5y, 3.0% of budgetSPREAD THE WORD NEVADA: $35,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetMARTHA'S TABLE INC: $16,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MARYLAND FOOD BANK INC: $16,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHESAPEAKE MULTICULTURAL RESOURCE CENTER INC: $15,100 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetTHE FOOD DEPOT: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHREE SQUARE: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChildren's Hospital Corporation: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TALBOT INTERFAITH SHELTER INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTH COUNTRY SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds ROW NEW YORK INC ↗
  • Who funds HIGH COUNTRY SUPPORTED LIVING ↗
  • Who funds CHESAPEAKE BAY MARITIME MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds BOSTON PARTNERS IN EDUCATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE WARD MELVILLE HERITAGE ORGANIZATION LTD ↗
  • Who funds SPREAD THE WORD NEVADA ↗
  • Who funds MARTHA'S TABLE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE MARYLAND FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds CHESAPEAKE MULTICULTURAL RESOURCE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE FOOD DEPOT ↗
  • Who funds THREE SQUARE ↗
  • Who funds Children's Hospital Corporation ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jpmorgan Chase FoundationNY11.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Fullwood Foundation Inc 6035-00-46 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Fullwood Foundation Inc 6035-00-46. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 10%
  • Boston Partners in Education Inc: 10% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 39 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Fullwood Foundation Inc 6035-00-46’s filings →

More from the funding graph