· Private foundation
Fullwood Foundation Inc 6035-00-46
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k5 grants · $35k
- $10k–50k12 grants · $165k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $60k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Individual grant recipient | $60,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $35,000 |
| TALBOT INTERFAITH SHELTER | $15,000 |
| High Country Living | $15,000 |
| Chesapeake Bay Maritime Museum | $15,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $12,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $12,000 |
| HORIZONS D C | $10,500 |
| Spread the Word Nevada | $10,500 |
| ROW NEW YORK | $10,000 |
| Boston Partners in Education | $10,000 |
| Humane Animal Rescue of PGH | $10,000 |
| Arts In Reach - New Hampshire | $10,000 |
| NM School for the Arts | $7,500 |
| The Ward Melville Heritage Organization | $7,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $60k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +34% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
27 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $71k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TITALBOT INTERFAITH SHELTER INC6× · 2020–2025 · $71k · revenue +148%
- NCNORTH COUNTRY SCHOOL INC3× · 2020–2022 · $58k · revenue +159%
- HCHIGH COUNTRY SUPPORTED LIVING4× · 2022–2025 · $53k · revenue +34%
Funded once
- CMCHESAPEAKE MULTICULTURAL RESOURCE CENTER INCgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $15k · revenue +98%
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2021 · $10k
- TFTHE FOOD DEPOTone grant, 2020 · $9k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of the capital area food bank (the food bank or cafb) is to help our neighbors thrive by creating more equitable access to food and opportunity through community partnerships.
Freshfarm is a washington, dc-based nonprofit that builds a more equitable, sustainable, and resilient food system in the mid-atlantic region by producing innovative solutions in partnership with local communities and organizations. we…
Manna food center, inc strives to end hunger in our community through education, advocacy, and food distribution to individuals and partner agencies. manna's guiding principles are to be service-driven, community- centered and…
We mobilize and educate our community to ensure equitable access to nutritious and familiar food. we do this by raising, and soliciting funds for the acquisition, storage, growing, collection and distribution of food to low income citizens…
Cultivate local food systems prioritizing health, equity, and sustainability, from farm forward.
The food trust (tft), a nonprofit founded in philadelphia in 1992, strives to make healthy food available to all.continued on schedule otft is a regional and national leader in developing new strategies to prevent childhood obesity and…
To provide food assistance through a network of partners, while educating and engaging our communities in the elimination of hunger and its causes.
To close the hunger gap in north texas by working through over 500 feeding partners to provide access to nutritious food and address the root causes of hunger.
Ingenuity prep public charter school was formed to prepare students to succeed in college and beyond as impactful civiic leaders.
Port chester carver center helps our community thrive through programs that nourish, educate, and empower.
Healthy chesapeake is committed to building a culture of wellness that supports, sustains and advocates for a healthier chesapeake. to achieve this, healthy chesapeake recognizes that health and well-being are interconnected with social,…
To end hunger in san francisco and marin counties by soliciting food donations nationally, distributing this food to qualifying public service agencies and neighborhood pantries, advocating for improved government food programs, and…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Martha's Table Inc and the most unlike its peers is Talbot Interfaith Shelter Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds TALBOT INTERFAITH SHELTER INC ↗
- Who funds NORTH COUNTRY SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds ROW NEW YORK INC ↗
- Who funds HIGH COUNTRY SUPPORTED LIVING ↗
- Who funds CHESAPEAKE BAY MARITIME MUSEUM INC ↗
- Who funds BOSTON PARTNERS IN EDUCATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE WARD MELVILLE HERITAGE ORGANIZATION LTD ↗
- Who funds SPREAD THE WORD NEVADA ↗
- Who funds MARTHA'S TABLE INC ↗
- Who funds THE MARYLAND FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds CHESAPEAKE MULTICULTURAL RESOURCE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds THE FOOD DEPOT ↗
- Who funds THREE SQUARE ↗
- Who funds Children's Hospital Corporation ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Fullwood Foundation Inc 6035-00-46 funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Boston Partners in Education Inc — 10% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.