Skip to content
Fuldner Family Fdn-Pia Equ at a glance

· Private foundation

Fuldner Family Fdn-Pia Equ

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$290k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Health$959kReligion$560kHuman Services$435kYouth Development$120kHousing & Shelter$75kCommunity Improvement$60k
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $70k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $220k
$50,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$6.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DINING FOR DIABETES - COX MONETT HOSP$100,000
CARE TO LEARN$70,000
CAMP BARNABAS$50,000
BARRY-LAWRENCE COUNTY DEVELOPMENT CENTER$25,000
FULLER CENTER FOR HOUSING INC$25,000
DEVON'S BEAT$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $90k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%SHOES THAT FIT: $20k → 14%CARE TO LEARN: $70k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.0M · 9 repeat orgs$181k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +53% since the first grant, against +36% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
4

Total granted

$2.0M
$111k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+53%
+36%

Still filing today

89%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $70k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthCrime & LegalHuman ServicesReligionPhilanthropyHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CF
    COXHEALTH FOUNDATION
    6× · 2018–2023 · $454k · revenue +123%
  • RM
    RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF THE OZARKS INC
    6× · 2018–2023 · $294k · revenue +75%
  • CH
    COX-MONETT HOSPITAL INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $210k · revenue +8%

Funded once

  • TC
    THE CHILDREN'S CENTER OF SOUTHWESTgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $50k · revenue +36%
  • TT
    THE TOOTH TRUCK INC
    one grant, 2024 · $40k · revenue 0%
  • ST
    SHOES THAT FITgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $20k · revenue +124%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ronald Mcdonald House Charities of Ne Kansas Inc

To provide lodging to families of hospitalized children at an affordable cost, or no cost, based on need through operation of the ronald mcdonald house.

Health
2
Ronald Mcdonald House Charities of South

At ronald mcdonald house, we provide essential services that remove barriers, strengthen families, and promote healing when children need healthcare.

Health
3
Ronald Mcdonald House Charities of Central Indiana Inc

To provide a supportive home-away-from-home for families of children receiving medical care at riley children's health and other area hospitals.

—
4
Children's Physicians

Children's physicians delivers the highest quality pediatric primary care while supporting education and research.

Health
5
Ronald Mcdonald House Charities of Central Texas Inc

To provide lodging and support services to families with critically ill or injured children.

Health
6
Community Health Center of Central Missouri

To provide improved access to primary care, behavioral healthcare and oral health care services for medically underserved individuals in central missouri regardless of their ability to pay. our vision is embracing people and inspiring…

Human Services
7
Ronald McDonald House Charities of Central Illinois

Ronald McDonald House Charities of Central Illinois (RMHCCI) provides programs to support the well-being of children and provides a home away from home for families with children receiving medical care.

—
8
Ronald Mcdonald House Charities of Mid Missouri Inc

The organization provides lodging and supportive services to families of serious ill or injured children who require medical care and treatment in columbia, mo area medical centers.

Health
9
Ronald Mcdonald House Charities of Columbia Sc

Ronald mcdonald house charities columbia, sc creates, funds and supports programs that directly improve the health and well-being of children and their families.

Human Services
10
Children's Hospital Medical Center

Cincinnati children's hospital medical center will be the leader in improving child health. cincinnati children's will provide child health and transform delivery of care through fully integrated, globally recognized research, education,…

Health
11
Cook Children's Medical Center

Knowing that every child's life is sacred, our promise is to improve the health of every child in our region through the prevention and treatment of illness, disease and injury.

Health
12
Arkansas Children's Inc

We champion children by making them better today and healthier tomorrow.arkansas children's will fundamentally transform healthcare delivery for the children of arkansas and beyond. arkansas children's core values are the organizational…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ronald Mcdonald House Charities of the Ozarks Inc; the most unlike its peers is Devons Beat. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
9/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BARNABAS FOUNDATION INC: $560,024 · ReligionBARNABAS FOUNDATION INCRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF THE OZARKS INC: $294,495 · HealthRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARI…COX-MONETT HOSPITAL INC: $210,000 · HealthCOX-MONETT HOSPITAL INCTHE TOOTH TRUCK INC: $40,000 · HealthTHE TOOTH TRUCK INCCOXHEALTH FOUNDATION: $454,115 · PhilanthropyCOXHEALTH FOUNDATIONBARRY-LAWRENCE COUNTY DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $195,000 · OtherBARRY-LAWRENCE COUNTY…CAMP BARNABAS: $120,000 · OtherCAMP BARNABASLINCOLN COUNCIL FOR COMMUNITY: $60,000 · OtherLINCOLN COUNCIL FOR C…THE CHILDREN'S CENTER OF SOUTHWEST: $50,000 · OtherTHE CHILDREN'S CENTER…+1 more: $1,000 · OtherCare to Learn: $70,000 · Human ServicesSHOES THAT FIT: $20,000 · Human ServicesTHE FULLER CENTER FOR HOUSING INC: $75,000 · Housing & ShelterDEVONS BEAT: $60,000 · Public Benefit
Religion$560,024Health$544,495Philanthropy$454,115Other$426,000Human Services$90,000Housing & Shelter$75,000Public Benefit$60,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBARNABAS FOUNDATION INC: $560,024 over 6y, 3.5% of budgetCOXHEALTH FOUNDATION: $454,115 over 6y, 1.0% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF THE OZARKS INC: $294,495 over 6y, 6.8% of budgetCOX-MONETT HOSPITAL INC: $210,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetBARRY-LAWRENCE COUNTY DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $195,000 over 3y, 12% of budgetCare to Learn: $70,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetDEVONS BEAT: $60,000 over 3y, 51% of budgetLINCOLN COUNCIL FOR COMMUNITY: $60,000 over 2y, 91% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S CENTER OF SOUTHWEST: $50,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetTHE TOOTH TRUCK INC: $40,000 over 1y, 7.5% of budgetSHOES THAT FIT: $20,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCRISIS NURSERY OF THE OZARKS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Arvest FoundationCommunity Foundation …Robert M - Bobby - Al…Missouri Sports Hall …Natl Christian Charit…The Bank of America C…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Arvest FoundationAR19.4× affinity7 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Arvest Foundation · Community Foundation of the Ozarks Inc · Robert M - Bobby - Allison Charitable Tr · Missouri Sports Hall of Fame · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Fuldner Family Fdn-Pia Equ funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Fuldner Family Fdn-Pia Equ. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Fuldner Family Fdn-Pia Equ?

    Find your warmest path to Fuldner Family Fdn-Pia Equ through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Fuldner Family Fdn-Pia Equ’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home